Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Grave Warnings to Precious Metal Investors - Buyer Beware!

I am a palladium bug, not a silver bug or gold bug. Although I do like silver and gold and I like all precious metal investments. My favorite remains palladium. But regardless what precious metal you like best, I urge all precious metal investors to own ONLY physical metals and stocks of their favorite precious metal mining companies.

I strongly discourage owning any Exchange Traded Funds, ETFs that invest only on future contracts or other paper instruments. I cited UNG and USO as perfect bad examples. At a point of time UNG was once the second largest long position in my portfolio, right after SWC. I still can not help but pad myself on my back for promptly realizing the fundamental problem with a paper based "commodity" ETF such as UNG, and sold without hesitation. Had I held UNG till this day I would have been much poorer. Unfortunately such ETF funds continue to make many unsuspect investors poorer by the day. So I urge every investor to carefully read why paper based ETFs do not work.

I do expect that 99% of the people will attack my view point that paper ETFs will not work. I don't mind as I know 99% of the people simply could not grasp the concept until they have lost all their money. I will be very happy if 1% of people feel that I have helped them to avoid costly mistakes and to make smart investment decisions.

Like advocators Jim Sinclair and Ted Butler, I always encourage people to directly own physical precious metals. I do not trust the physical gold ETF, GLD, and the physical silver ETF, SLV. Like some other folks I expressed skeptism whether these funds actually hold the physical precious metals as they claimed. These ETF funds were hosted by entities known to be hostile to precious metal investors and known to have large short positions in silver so why should people trust them? At one point I went so far as scrutinizing the almost 10,000 pages long silver bars list posted by iShares Silver Trust (SLV), and discovered plenty of red flags.

But what I just discovered may shock the raw core out of every SLV investors' shells. If you read the following and you still feel comfortable investing in SLV, and do not feel a need to scrutinize the fund a little bit more yourself, then maybe you are too numb to even invest money in the dangerous marketplace of today, and it is probably a good thing you lose money, if indeed this is exposed to be one of the biggest scam of our time.

This is a nuclear bomb I am dropping, so before I continue let me make a few things clear for my own legal protection. I am a US Citizen with constitutional right to free speech, and conscious forces me to speak out. I do not have a short position in SLV and stands for no monetary gain out of this disclosure. I am a supporter of precious metal investments and want to see higher silver price. I have no vested interest against any entity involved, other than that I insist seeing honesty and integrity of all involved parties.

That said, I have noticed that iShare recently hired an independent auditor to inspect the silver bars in their vault, and issue audit certificates such as this most recent one. I urge you to follow the link to immediately download a copy of the inspection certificate and save it on your computer, lest it disappear soon! The auditor, Inspectorate International Limited, is a very reputable commodity inspector for 150 years in the business. Very good! I welcome iShare's move to hire a reputable auditor to look at their silver bars and disclose it to the public. If you trust Inspectorate, and they visited iShare vaults and come back to tell us they see all the silver bars stored in the vaults, then it should put all skeptism at rest and people should feel safe to invest in SLV shares, right?

Not so fast! Not so dandy fast and easy, I say folks! Look at this Audit Certificate once again. It's only two pages. Print it out, friend. But Inspectorate is a big company and it just so happens that the same Mr. Paul Alston, a nice and respectable English gentlemen, was also hired to do audit for GoldMoney.com, and issued audit reports like this, this, this, this and most recently this.

Do you see anything unusual, folks, when you compare the two pages SLV audit report and the 14+ pages GoldMoney audit reports, alleged done by the same Mr. Paul Alston?

1. SLV has a two page lousy report that says almost nothing, while GoldMoney has much more elaborate reports detailing every aspect of the inspection process, including such seemingly unimportant information like the brand of the sale used for weighing, even though SLV has way much more silver to be inspected.

2.Inspectorate issued a paper audit certificate to GoldMoney and they have to use an awkward optical scanner to scan the image of the paper certificate and post on the web. More awkwardly, the brits use a paper size narrower than standard American letter size, thus the scanning exposes the ugly paper edge, telling the size of the margin to the edge of the paper. Wouldn't it be nice to do like what iShare did, create a nice and clean electronic PDF document, leaving no trace of the paper, and just digitally embed the Inspectorate logo, and an image of Mr. Paul Alston's signature? Except that anybody with a computer can do it. It's not hard to find a sample image of Mr. Paul Alston's signature off the web, right? (Don't try it at home, kids!)

3.Unfortunately Bank of New York Mellon is in America and speaks a different kind of English than the one spoken by Mr. Paul Alston, a nice British gentleman. And the vaults are supposed to be in England. They forgot such unimportant details and let a lousy American created that Inspectorate Report. Congradulations on getting the paper size to be the correct A4 size, but they need to work on small details, for example Inspectorate would not begin the sentence with "The Bank of New York" as the sentence subject and would not use the ® mark when referring to third party names, and the British would refer a date as 7th of July, 2010, not in the lousy American style July 7, 2010. I encourage them to really spend some time studying how Inspectorate issue their audit certificates. They should have done that before they post it.

I will stop here and let people draw their own conclusions. But I do NOT for a single bit believe that Mr. Paul Alston himself personally counted and inspected 308,542 pieces of silver bars, and sampled and measured each one bar out of each pallet of 30 bars all by himself and his gangs, and issued that SLV audit certificate and signed his name on it. Not a bit at all.

Full Disclosure: The author is fully invested in mining stock SWC, PAL and precious metal palladium. The author also holds physical silver and silver mining stocks like SSRI, CDE and HL, but has no position in ETF funds GLD, SLV, UNG and USO.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

What is your current thinking on DRYS these days? You used to be a bull, but you have not mentioned the dry shipping industry for a while. Is it something you are bearish on, or just agnostic?

Anonymous said...

it appears the pdf was created on sunday july 27th at 11:27
pm

Anonymous said...

the date is a clear giveaway imo

Anonymous said...

I googled and found several Inspectorate PDF bullion surveys. Some are two pages. But none use American style dating as the one you show for IShares. I would have to guess that the document appears fraudulent or certainly not by Inspectorate. The coloration of the logo is off from all the other files as well.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for finding these anomalies. Not sure what to think but share your general concern about GLD & SLV (anything with JPM involved). I wonder if there could be some reasonable explanation - only way to find out is to contact the author (who did not appear to actually sign the letter - says 'for'). Especially considering there were anomalies, could have been delayed until he was on vacation (in US?), etc. Seems to be a lot of bad news around these days. Hopefully just the needed 20% pullback.

Anonymous said...

Also, look at the letter heads. On the GoldMoney statements, the logo on the first page of each statement is bigger than on the following pages. That's also the case with the SLV statements. However, the bigger logos on the GoldMoney sheets do not have the words 'an Inspicio company' printed underneath them, which only appear underneath the smaller letter heads. Contrast this with the big logo on the SLV statement: it does have the words 'an Inspicio company" underneath the logo. Weird....

Anonymous said...

All sorts of collectible figurines, [url=http://allcollectiblefigurines.com/deals/Willow+Tree+Figurine/]Willow Tree Figurine[/url], [url=http://allcollectiblefigurines.com/deals/Baby+Figurine/]Baby Figurine[/url], [url=http://allcollectiblefigurines.com/deals/Duck+Figurine/]Duck Figurine[/url], [url=http://allcollectiblefigurines.com/deals/Nativity+Figurine/]Nativity Figurine[/url], [url=http://allcollectiblefigurines.com/deals/Lighthouse+Figurine/]Lighthouse Figurine[/url], [url=http://allcollectiblefigurines.com/deals/Thanksgiving+Figurine/]Thanksgiving Figurine[/url].

Anonymous said...

[url=http://infobooksonline.com/shop/Textbooks/]Textbooks[/url]. Biological Science, Biology, Constitutional Law, Financial Accounting, Marketing, Operating System Concepts, Organic Chemistry.

TARA said...

The KEY DIFFERENCES between gold money and slv lies in the word CERFIFY OR CERFIFIED. NOTE GOLD MONEY INVENTORY IS CERTIFIED AS TO WHERE AS SLV report is just a statement with nothing certified to. Acconting firms are only liable to people relying on CERTIFIED REPORTS, not uncertified reports. The slv report is merelya statement and also note they did not audit the fund itself, they just did an examination of bars they were told were owned by slv and reviewed the respctive reports of the inventory. they did nothing to CERTIFY THE FUNDS OWNERSHIP OF THE BARS. i am a retired cpa in usa, and must say SLV IS PUSHING THE ENVEOPE

simple wedding dresses said...

Woman’s beauty lace wedding dresses with the passing years, so does the vintage wedding dresses. Slipping into a piece of vintage clothing bestow the magic of provenance upon your original attractiveness. Our wedding dresses 2012 collectibles capture this very essence of historical statement by flashing back to the pristine demeanor while infusing some modern interpretation. Then and there, your cherished memory flows out with the singing of Yesterday Once More.

sports handicapping software said...

hello friends the truth is worth this kind of articles found are very good

QUALITY STOCKS UNDER 5 DOLLARS said...

Really good stuff.