Stock Psychology

More On the Coming Palladium Paradigm Shift

2011-08-19T17:46:00.000-07:00

In early December, 2010, I pointed that there will be a huge paradigm shift in the supply/demand of the global palladium and platinum market. Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK), the largest nickel mine in the world who is also responsible for 45% of the world's palladium and 10% of platinum, is abandoning the traditional pyrometallurgy process and adopting the more efficient Activox Process, hydrometallurgy that extracts base metals from mineral ores by chemical leaching. The change is necessary due to severe pollution and deteriorating ore grade.

Knowing the physics in mining, I saw something with hugely significance: While the new technology can extract nickel and copper at near 100% efficiency at low cost, it also means that the chemically stable PGM contents, platinum and palladium, will be extremely difficult to extract. Norilsk will cease to be a major supplier of palladium and platinum. The supply disruption will cause a panic in the global market, sending the price of palladium to the sky!!!

After my article was published, some folks raised some questions. I have done more research on this issue and collected more information. The more I looked at it the more I am convinced of the unescapable conclusion. I will summarize the important points here:

1. Will Norilsk Nickel switch to Activox Process if they could lose PGM revenue?

They have to switch! Maintaining status quo is not sustainable:

a. Due to heavy pollution thanks to the traditional pyrometallurgy, Norilsk City tops the world's most polluted places. 98% of the people are sick. There is not a single live tree within a 30 miles radius. The company is paying 2.6 times higher salary for mining workers, but still can not retain the workforce. If the cost is losing your heath and lose the ability to to raise heathy children, who would want to work in such a filthy place? The government would not turn a blind eye forever.

b. Pyrometallurgy is extremely energy intensive. Even though the technology can extract up to 70% of the base metals and palladium, higher energy cost and deteriorating ore grade means the process could become un-profitable, even if you don't consider the cost to the environment.

c. Activox Process consumes much less energy. The chemicals can be recycled and reused. Not to mention that it extracts nearly 100% of the base metals, versus 70% in pyrometallurgy. The lower cost, more efficient extraction of nickel and copper more than offset loss of PGM revenue.

d. All information indicates that Norilsk is making the switch. They paid US$6.5B cash to acquire LionOre to obtain the Activox Process technology, and rename it to Norilsk Process. They announced aggressive projects to improve mining process. They announced that beginning in 2013, the sulphur emission will be cut from nearly one million tons a year, to only 0.2 million. Such drastic pollution reduction can only happen with the switch to Activox.

Although in the same investor presentation, Norilsk projected continued palladium and platinum production at near flat level. Many readers quoted that report and criticized my conclusion. My response is that Norilsk did not develop the technology, it purchased it. The investor report was prepared by high level management who know very little of the actual physics in mining process. From their point of view, whatever is in the ore, they assume it can be extracted. Whatever technology that do not exist today to extract certain metal content, they assume will become available some years down the road. When making long term projections you are not encumbed by limitation of what is feasible today, but you aim for the long term goal. So I don't blame Norilsk for making the projection that they are going to continue to produce palladium. But the projection is too rosy. It is unrealistic.

But investors need to scrutinize what can or can not be done today or in the near future. We have to get to the intimate details to dig out the facts. With known physics, I do NOT see how they can continue to extract PGM metals once they switch to Activox.

2. Is it really impossible to extract PGM metals once Activox Process is adopted

We have to look at the basic physics of mining process. After mineral ores are collecetd from a mine, the first step, called milling, is to crush the materials into small particles so the rocks and the metal containing grains can then be separated. In traditional mining process, a technology with over a hundred years of history is used, called Froth Flotation. Let me explain it.

Different material stick to oil or other liquid differently. Some will soak in the liquid, some will form oil like droplets as they don't stick. Using this property, we can pour the crushed mineral grains into certain water solutions, and then blow bubbled from the bottom. The metal grains will more likely stick to the bubbles and be bought to the surface, while rock particles remain on the bottom. We can then skim off the top layer which contains metal rich concentrates. This process is called froth flotation.

Mining engineers will tell you that for effective froth flotation, the ores must be grinded to proper particle size. If it is grinded too coarsely, then the metals and rocks are still mixed in the same particles. But if it is over-grinded, it results in particles so tiny that they are almost equally likely to stick to the bubbles, thus it is unable to separate metal and non-metal content. The over-grinding is also called sliming.

How much grinding is over-grinding? This paper and many others suggest that roughly 30 to 80 microns is the ideal particle size for optimum froth flotation recovery. For particles 10 microns or less, the recovery rate quickly falls off.

Chemical leaching, like Activox Process, has a different grinding requirement. For effective leaching, the ores must be ultra fine grinded so as to thoroughly expose the metals to the chemical solution. Literatures on Activox, like this, and this, describe that the ores are grinded to 10 microns or less before feeding into the leach process.

Based on the flow chart, the PGM metals are left in the solid leach residue. The material is then send to a Froth Flotation process to attempt to extract the PGM particles. That was the original design intention. In the actual Tati Nickel demostration plant, the PGM flotation unit was never actually built to test the feasibility of this extra PGM extraction step.

In Norilsk ores, 99.98% of the metal content is nickel and copper. Platinum and palladium is only 0.02%. Starting with 10 microns metal particles, going through chemical leaching which dis-solves 99.98% of the nickel and copper, there is just a tiny bit of the original metal particles remaining. I calculated the resulting PGM particles will be less than 0.6 microns in diameter.

The 0.6 microns number assumes that during the chemical leaching, metal particles do not break down into bits, but remain whole grains. Most likely the particles do break into bits, thus the PGM content probably will become such tiny dusts that they are simply lost within the leach waste. It's just not possibel to recover anything through the conventional froth flotation method, which requires 30 to 120 microns particles. There is no other known technology to pick up such metal dusts efficiently from the waste material.

So the inevitable conclusion, based on physics, is: Norilsk Nickel can NOT produce platinum and palladium any more once they move towards Activox. But they must switch over to the process!

3. How do you leverage the opportunity?

Buy any palladium coins or metal bars you can find; Purchase the PALL and PPLT, which are ETFs backed by physical palladium and platinum metals. But more attractive is to buy shares of the world's only primary palladium producers: Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL).

I encourage metals analysts, and experts from major PGM metal industry users, to really look into this looming palladium supply issue, and consult mining experts to verify my conclusion.

Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in palladium and in stocks of SWC and PAL.

How Fast Can The US Dollar Collapse?

2011-08-11T12:28:00.000-07:00

Recent volatile and relentless surging gold price suggests that we are getting closer to the catastrophic collapse of the US dollar and other likewise fiat currencies of the world.

Remember, no matter how high gold price goes up, it is not the value of gold that's going up, it is the value of the dollar that's going down. Gold is just a commodity that happen to be commonly used as money. Gold does not pay interest or generate income. Gold has no investment value but has storage value. No matter how high gold price goes up, you are not going to be able to buy more stuff with gold, but you merely avoided the loss of value holding ever depreciating dollar.

How fast can the US dollar collapse is the same question as asking how fast can the gold price go up, in dollar terms. Let me try to come up with a model.

The gold price can be written in the following generic formula, which is always correct as long as you choose the proper time dependent function Y(T):

P = P0 * exp(Y(T))

The price of gold should increase or decrease in exponential terms. No matter where the price is, the change is alway in percentages, i.e., the change is reflected in the exponent Y(T). As time elapses, Y(T) increases over time, giving an ever increasing exponent and ever increasing gold price. So let's look at what Y(T) should look like.

In the constant inflation scenary, gold price should increase the same percentage each year, therefore Y(T) would simply be proportional to the time, t, Y(T) = C*T.

But we are not talking about constant inflation. The scenary looks like at first, there is almost no inflation. And then as inflation slowly kicks in, the problem becomes more and more serious, and they print more and more money to spend. Therefore, the higher the inflation pace, the more money they print, and the more money they print, the higher the inflation will go up. It all starts with almost no inflation, and ends with inflation approaching infinity.

In mathematics we can write such correlation simply as that the derivative of Y(T) is directly proportion to Y(T) itself:

dY(T)/dt = C * Y(T)

If you are familiar with math you immediately recognize what it is. It is the exponential function:

Y(T) = EXP(C*(T-T0))

Thus we obtain an elegant math formula of gold price, once you plug in the Y(T):

P = P0 * exp(exp(C*(T-T0)))

Let's pick the two constants. The current gold bull market starts in the beginning of year 2000. Let's use year for the variable T. T0 = 2000. For example today, August 11, 2011 is the 223th day of the year. So for today, T = 2011 + (223/365) = 2011.611

Let's use $200 as starting gold price at the beginning of 2000. That would require that

P = P0 * exp(exp(0)) = $200

Therefore P0 = $200/exp(1) = $73.5

I find that using the constant C = 0.1 gives a perfect gold price match for the past 10 years:

P = $73.50 * exp(exp(0.1*(T-2000)))

For today, T = 2011.611, the formula will give $1791. That's right where we are right now today on the gold price!

Hold your breath. And now, the following chart shows how good this elegant formula matches up with the past eleven years of gold price, and what the future trend will be!

Folks, you still have some time, but clearly time is quickly running out before hyperinflation kicks in in full power. Buy physical precious metals now: Gold, silver, platinum and my favorite, palladium! Buy precious metal and commodity mining stocks: SWC, PAL, PCX, SSRI, CDE, JRCC, PAAS. These are the only things that can protect you in the coming years!

White Gold, Black Gold and China's Energy Crisis

2011-07-09T15:51:00.000-07:00

China has a looming energy crisis. There is a severe, ongoing electricity power shortage throughout most area of China since spring time this year. The power shortage occured long before the summer peak power consumption season kicks in. Mean while, city residents complain about high food prices while tearful farmers had to destroy their harvest corps of vegetables and bananas, because no one is buying their food produces even at dirt cheap give away price of a few cents per pound. The reason: even though the prices of produces may be dirt cheap where they are harvested, the cost of transportating them and distribute them into the basket of city dwellers is no way cheap at all. The transportation bottleneck in China is just another facet of the energy crisis in China: There are not enough truck and diesel fuel to transport the good around the country, because diesel fuel is also needed to generate electricity.

China is a huge country with close to 1.4 billion people. The world population is now approaching the 7 billion mark. The rapid economic development in China and in other emerging market means a lot more energy is consumed to produce and transport all the goods and foods to feed the world's population. But we are quickly approaching the limit of how much planet earth can supply to feed the population of this world, both in terms of fossil fuels, and in terms of other natural resources.

The reality of limit of growth is one that every investor needs to reckon with. The goal of any investment is the growth of fortune. Economists believe that sustainable growth is always possible given enough incentive of demands. But in a limited world, sustainable growth is not possible. How do individual investor grow his/her share of the fortune, when there is a limit of growth for the world as a whole? A while ago I pointed out thet fact that the most successful investor in the world, Mr. Warren Buffett, actually saw his fortune SHRUNK by 75%, in teh last 13 years, in real valuation term. It should make you pause and think about: Why Mr. Buffett could not grow his fortune in the last 13 years. What chance do we the small popatos have, in beating Warren Buffett and do much better than him in growing our investment fortune?

Great investment opportunities can be discovered if you recognize how resource constraints are limiting the growth of China and other emerging markets. Let's look at some numbers in China's on going power shortage. According to BP World Energy Review 2011: China produces and consumes more than half of the world's coal in 2011: China produced 1800.4 MTOE (million tons of oil equivalent) of coal out of the world's 3731.4 MTOE, and consumed about as much. One ton of coal in average is equivalent to 0.55 tons of oil in energy content. So in real tonnage, China produced and consumed 3.3 billion tons of coal per year. That number had been increasing annually at 10% pace in recent years!

China's domestic coal production simply could not catch up with demand growing at such a pace. It has to turn towards importation. China only begin to import significant amount of coal in 2009. By 2010 the net coal import reached 150 million tons. The staggering growth is sure to continue in 2011, to 233 million tons according to Citigroup.

This year China faces a power shortage of 30G, or even 40G watts. In average it costs roughly 0.55 kilograms of coal to generate one kilowatt-hour of electricity. So 30GW shortage means a need of an extra 145 million tons of coal per year to fill the gap. That's more than the amount of coal burned by ESKOM in South Africa to generate electricity!!!

But look at the world's major coal exporters you have to wonder where can China get its coal in the next few years. The total global coal export is only roughly 1 billion tons per year. At 3.3 billion tons per year basis, one year of China's demand growth at 10% pace is big enough to consume 1/3 of the world's total available exports. The world doesn't have any spare coal export to meet China's growing demand, unless major coal producers drastically ramp up their production and exportation.

Don't forget India, a developing economy with a population that is about to exceed China, and one which is growing almost as fast as China. India also has an insatiable appetite for coal. It is also facing a severe domestic coal shortage and is looking around the world for coal. India produces 400 million tons of coal per year but consumes 555 million tons, numbers that are much lower than China's, meaning a much bigger potential for demand growth. The Indians are traveling around the world to sign coal contracts just as the Chinese do. So where can the Indians and the Chinese find extra coal supply?

Let's turn attention to South Africa, the only place that foreign importers can hope to buy more. According to a recent report on the operation of ESKOM, south Africa's national electricity company, they buy domestic coal at prices much lower than international market price, and collect electricity revenue at electricity prices much cheaper than any other countries. In last year, ESKOM burned 125 million tons of coal, paid 35.8 billion rands for the fuel and collected 91 billion rands from electricity tariffs. Using 0.55 kilogram of coal per kilowatt-hour electricity, and one US dollar equals to 6.70 rands, I calculated that ESKOM is paying less than $43 per ton of coal, and South Africa is paying an average of US$0.06 per kwh of electricity. Actually the subsidized big industry is paying way much less, at about 0.25 rands per kwh, or 3.73 US cents.

The coal price ESKOM is paying is not competitive against potential international importers, who are now paying more than US$120 per ton just to load South African coal into ships waiting at the harbors. The country has such a crumbling electricity supply infrastructure that this year, before the arrival of the winter season, which is July in the southern hemisphere, ESKOM could not afford to shut down the power generators for routine maintenance on a rotational basis.

With ESKOM's power generators working overtime without proper maintenance, burning lowest quality coal that frequently clogs up the equipments, and more over they probably will not be able to get supply of even such lowest quality coal for much longer because the Indian and the Chinese importers are eager to pay a much higher price to buy lower quality coal, how long will it be before the country's electricity grid crumble down once more, triggering a panic rally of prices of precious metals platinum and palladium like in early 2008? South Africa is the world's major producer of PGM metals, producing 85% of the world's platinum and 40% of palladium.

Mining and production of PGM metals is extremely energy intensive. According to data from major platinum producers, it costs roughly 1x10^10 joules of energy, or 2778 kwh of electricity to produce just one troy ounce of PGM metals. That's only direct energy cost. Count in exploration and development of mines, mining equipments, and labor cost etc, the total direct and indirect energy cost could be 5 times higher at 13890 kwh. If fair cost of energy is US$0.15 per kwh, then the fair cost of PGM metals should be at least $2100 per ounce.

So the best way to leverage on China's energy crisis due to shortage of the black gold, the coal, is surprisingly in metals that South Africa produces: the white gold, platinum and palladium. Coal shortage means platinum and palladium shortage one way or another: Either South Africa keeps price of its electricity low and it leads to a crumling electricity grid which collapses the country's PGM mining industry, or ESKOM has to pay fair market price for coal and charge big industry fair electricity cost, bringing the PGM mining industry out of business unless they ask for much higher prices for platinum and palladium.

How to play platinum and palladium? Buy the physical precious metal, or the physcial metal backed ETFs, PPLT and PALL. As for mining companies, I would not recommend South Africa based PGM mining companies: they are restrainted by the country's electricity grid. Instead you should look in North America: Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL) are the world's only primary palladium producers. Located in North American and being the world's only PGM producers with the capacity to grow production, they are best positioned to take advatnage of a situation created by China, India and South Africa.

Blatant Manipulation in the Precious Metal Market

2011-05-13T17:33:00.000-07:00

Recently the CME Group had been raising margin requirements on silver and other commodities almost on a daily basis. The relentless margin hacking up ultimately caused a plummet of silver price from near $50/oz, to around $35/oz, a roughly 30% drop, in less than one week. Such plummet in silver price was un-precedent. The plummet in silver price wiped out a lot of speculative silver investors.

A number of precious metal analysts call the CME margin increase blatant market manipulation. I agree. It's blatant market manipulation conducted by the CME exchange itself. It is unfair. The policy change is clearly tilted in favor of one group of market participants against another group. Whether such blatant market manipulation has broken any SEC regulation, or whether some one should go to jail for it, I will leave it to lawyers to decide. But one thing is clear: The actions of CME had caused disturbing disruption in the precious metal and commodity market.

The problem is not with the increased margin requirement. It is completely in an exchange's right and duty to set proper margin requirements and adjust it periodically to ensure orderly market trading activities. The problem is with the manner in which the CME raises margin requirement.

Instead of a gradual and smooth adjustment of the margin requirement over a long period of time, CME choose to leave the margin unchanged while the silver price was raising rapidly early in the year. And then, right before the "sell in may, go away" season, they suddenly begin to hack up silver future's margin aggressively on a daily basis. The consequence is predictable. Instead of stabolizing the market, they disrupted the market. Why they do not adjust the margin down accordingly, now that silver has lost 1/3 of its recent price high? Why are the margin adjustment asymmetic? One has to wonder whether the decision to successively jack up margin ratio was purposeful, with the goal of suppressing silver price in aim.

The margin requirement in its current forms are asymmetric, because the long side is being punished while the short side is rewarded. It is unfair because it requires CASH deposits on both the long and the short. This torelates and encourages illegal naked shorting of futures contracts.

Let me explain. A silver future's contract is a binding legal contract between the contract writer (the seller, or the short side), and the contract holder (the buyer, or the long side), that at a future time, the seller shall deliver an agreed amount of physical silver, for consideration of an agreed amount of cash tendered by the buyer. Alternatively, the buyer may choose to settle the contract in cash instead of take physical delivery. But that should be up to the buyer to choose, NOT up to the seller to decide whether the contract can be settled in cash or delivery be made. Failure to do either cash settlement or delivery by contract expiration date is a breach of the binding contract, and the side which causes the failure is the side at fault. Please note, if the contract buyer demands a physical delivery but the seller could not honor the request, it is a contract default even if the two sides could settle in cash.

Margin requirement is a requirement of maintaining minimum asset, imposed by the exchange to ensure that futures contracts will be fulfilled, and no default shall occur. It is reasonable to impose a cash margin requirement, so in the case the contract holder is unable or unwilling to tender the full cash amount for delivery, he/she is able to choose instead settle in cash and be able to pay the difference in cash.

But what about margin requirement on the contract seller side. The existing margin requirement on sellers is in CASH, just like the requirement on buyers. This ensures that the seller can pay the cash difference in the case the contracts are settled in cash. But what about the cases that the contract holder request physical delivery but the seller is unable to honor the request? Remember, it is up to the buyer, not the seller, to choose physical delivery.

What assurance does the exchange has that when the contract buyer demands physical delivery, that it will be honored, and there will be no failure of delivery? Nothing. There is simply no such guarantee. I think that is a big problem. Maybe the exchange reason in imposing a cash margin requirement on the short is that as long as the short has the cash, he she can always go to the spot market to acquire physical silver, and make good on the delivery request.

Such reasoning is frauded. The physical spot market is limited, while the volume of contracts that can be written and sold has no limit. It is impossible to deliver more silver that what's actually exist out of there. As a matter of fact, if all existing silver future's contracts are settled in physical delivery, the delivery requirement will be many times more than silver that is available.

I believe silver future contract writers must be required to pose a certain amount of physical silver, or demonstrate ability to delivery physical silver (like for mining companies), instead of pose cash, to meet the margin requirement.

Allowing silver future contract writers, most of them have no business in silver mining and have no possession of an ounce of silver, to meet their margin requirement in cash instead of silver bullions, not only is unfair and frauded, but probably is ILLEGAL, too.

Knowingly enter into a business contract with knowledge that he/she can not and will not fulfill, is not just a SCAM, but a CRIME punisheable under contract laws and criminal laws.

If one trader naked short 2 million shares of a company's stock, knowing there's only one million shares outstanding and that he/she could not possibly borrow two million shares, is ILLEGAL under SEC regulations. You can go to jail for doing that.

If you write up a contract to sell a bridge in Brooklyn, New York, and actually collected an idiot's money from it, knowing full well that you do not own that bridge, is a crime. You go to jail for it. I am not sure though, about some one who sells real estate property on the moon, as some obviously is doing. But at least the guy claims he owns the moon, and the buyers do not insist on delivery.

Shouldn't there be some legal repercussions for the nake shorters of silver, especially the biggest naked shorters of silver who happen to be big banks? They write and sell a huge volume of silver future contracts to knock price down within a very short period of time, rip profits doing so, knowing full well those futures contracts are invalid, because they could NOT be honored if physical delivery is requested. There were far more silver future's contracts sold and outstanding, than physical silver that is available.

I hereby request that CME and other commodity exchanges consider imposing margin requirements in physical commodity, rather than in cash, on future contract writers. And I want to see if the authority is up to its task to investigate whether there has been illegal naked shorting in the precious metal and commodity future's market, activities that certain parties write future contracts that they know full well can not be honored. But I do not hold out hope on that happening any time soon.

To precious metal investors, I say you either take physical delivery, or do not even participate in the market. What is the point of buying a contract but do not take delivery? Future's trading is a zero sum paper game. As I explained in the past, if you want to profit from the commodity bull market, take possession of physical goods is the only way. If you don't hold it, you don't have it.

Full Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in physical palladium metal, and have very large positions in palladium mining stocks SWC and PAL. The author also owns a number of silver mining stocks but does not own any share of GLD, the gold ETF, or of SLV, the silver ETF.

Richest Billionaires Must Also Be Biggest Losers

2011-04-16T12:19:00.000-07:00

It sounds ironic. People who worked their lifetime to become some of the richest billionaires must have some good quality in their characters to ensure their success. But some how once the richest billonaires reach their pinnacles, their fortunes inevitably begin to decline, despite of their best efforts and intentions to keep growing their stakes to something even bigger.

But it is also absolutely true! The richest billionaires are also the biggest losers.

I am not just talking about the financial crisis of 2008, in which probably most people lose money anyway. I am talking about it as a generally true fact, like in the last ten years. In 1999, Bill Gates was the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $90B. Remember that was in terms of 1998 US dollars, when gold was $288 an ounce by the year end. So Bill Gates was worth 313 million ounces of gold then. Warren Buffet's $36B would have been worth 125 million ounces of gold at the time.

By 2005, Bill Gates was worth $46.5B, Warren Buffet was worth $44B, and Carlos Slim of Mexico was worth $23.8B. In terms of gold, which was $437/oz (end of 2004), Gates was worth 106.4M ounces, Buffet was worth 100.7M ounces, and Slim was 54.5M ounces. Gates was only 1/3 as rich as he was in 1999. Mr. Bill Gates probably wished that he had sold his company in 1999 and staked away his fortune in gold bars at a secret location.

By today, after the market plummet in 2008 and then an incredible recovery in 2009 and 2010, let's check the score again. Carlos Slim is worth $74B, Gates is worth $53B, and Buffet is worth $47B. Gold was $1422/oz at the end of 2010. So in terms of gold, these three richest billionaires are worth 52M ounces, 39.4M ounces and 35.2M ounces, respectively. The combined fortune of all three is only worth 40% of what Bill Gates alone was worth in 1999.

These two charts track the top billionaire's networth in US$ and in gold ounces, in last 10 years:

It's really surprising. Warren Buffet is known to be the world's most successful value based investor, with all the good characters of investment success: patient, determined, diligent. He had the track record of consistently gaining about 40% each year, in his investment career spanning over 4 decades. But in the last 10 years, his fortune barely gained anything even in terms of the depreciation US dollars.

In terms of gold ounces, or real purchasing power term, Warren Buffet lost more than HALF of his fortune in the last ten years. He lost that much fortune despite of all his personal DD efforts working 12 hours a day, and a team of hundreds of the world's best financial geniuses working with him. All these time and energy spent trying to make the best investment decisions for the world's most respected investment firm Berkshire Hathaway, and they still lose money?

Warren Buffet is famously know for his despise of gold, which he doesn't understand:

Gold gets dug out of the ground in Africa, or someplace. Then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people to stand around guarding it. It has no utility. Anyone watching from Mars would be scratching their head.

That famous gold quotation sounds reasonable with me and I actually agree with him. An ounce of gold is forever just an ounce of gold. It doesn't grow. Gold is only worth what it costs to extract an ounce of gold from the ground. That certainly is worth a lot of money but it is not growing. Gold is merely a storage of value, not a growth of value. So gold is really not an investment.

But Warren Buffet could well have digged a hole 10 years ago and buried all his fortune in gold bars. His stake would not have grown had he done that, but his fortune at least would not have shrunken like it happened. In the last ten years Warren Buffet diligently managed his investment firm, trying to find valuable companies to buy, selling any asset that seems to cost him money, his giant investment kindom accumulates huge amount of profits and dividends, allowing him to buy up more assets. But despite of all these, his net fortune is barely flatline in US dollar terms, and shrunk to barely 1/4 where he once was, in terms of gold ounces.

Why top billionaires must necessarily once day become top losers? It's not because these rich people have grown too old to think rationally, but simply because they have become too big to grow. Young Warren Buffet could buy a six-pack soda for 25 cents and then sold each can separately, and make an instant 20% gain in an afternoon. Senior Warren Buffet, with his net fortune worth $47B, would now have to buy 18 billion of six-pack sodas for $2.50 each, and find a giant beach with 108 billion thirsty people to vendor individual cans of soda to them for 50 cents each, to grow his fortune 20%.

The world does not have a beach that big. The world is a small place. The universe has a finite size. Persistent growth is not possible in a finite world. When you hit a certain size, you simply can not grow any more. Rapid growth is only possible when you are small. Warren Buffet once purchased a lot of silver bullions, about 1/3 of what the whole world had to offer. It costed only 2% of his fortune. But he could not keep even just 2% of his fortune in physical silver. He was forced to sell his silver.

To the average Joe investors, it's pleasant to know that you can beat the billionaires easily. You can easily make more money than billionaires do, in making the kind of investment decisions that billionaires could not make: Warren Buffet could not buy silver, but an average Joe can walk into a coin store and purchase a couple hundred ounces any time. Had you bought physical silver a mere two and a half years ago, your fortune has more than quadrupled from your initial investment, an investment gain that few of the world's billionaires could achieved.

I pitched physical tellurium investment a few years ago when tellurium was $40 a pound, today it's nearly $500 per kilogram, with the price surged 50% in just the last two months, marching with certainty towards gold price as I predicted. Had I pitched tellurium investment to Mr. Warren Buffet, he would have brushed me away as if I told him to vendor soda packs on the beaches. Folks like him are too big to be concerned in such narrow markets, but an average Joe Six-Pack could have bought six buckets of tellurium for less than 10 grands, and make himself a millionaire in a few short years.

It's great to be a small investor since you have many great opportunities to easily grow much bigger. Those opportunities are not available to billionaires. I notice that Mr. Jim Rogers, my most respected commodity investment guru, pitched silver and my favorite palladium to his audiences since early 2009. The annual global production of silver is only 600M ounces. After industry demand is meet, there is no more than 100M available to investors, or $1B in early 2009 silver price. Palladium's annual global production is slightly over 6M ounces. There is no palladium left for investors after industry demand is meet. But even if there are some palladium ounces available, there are probably no more than 500K ounces per year available to investors. At early 2009 prices, the market liquidity of silver and palladium was $1.1B and $0.1B respectively. If you bought either metal at the lows, your money would have quadrupled by now. But I don't think Jim Roger's fortune had quadrupled during the same time. Mr. Jim Rogers himself is probably too rich for those two narrow precious metal market. Both silver and palladium and excellent investment opportunities for the average Joes, and un-available to billionaires. Jim Rogers could not buy the metals himself that he urged people to buy.

So, do NOT listen to the world's top billionaires. You should be inspired by the stories how they accumulated their fortune, and their general philosophy of the society and of life in the world. But do NOT listen to top billionaires as far as investment decision goes. They have now become irrelevant losers while you are the winners. You need to listen to the small guys like me and other Seeking Alpha authors, and then do your own thinking. Warren Buffet would not tell you to buy gold, silver, palladium and he probably doesn't know what is tellurium. I will tell you to buy tellurium, buy palladium, and other investment opportunities meant for the small guys. At the end of days the billionaires are proven wrong, and small people like me are proven right.

Full Disclosure: I am heavily invested in physical palladium and silver, and related mining companies, but otherwise have no specific positions related to the discussion of this article.

Global PGM Supply - Lights Going Out in South Africa Agagin?

2011-01-10T11:25:00.000-08:00

Many platinum and palladium investors remembers the spectacular rally of platinum and palladium price in the first few months of 2008, when electricity crisis in South Africa forced the PGM mining industry in the country to shut down for 5 days, causing a market panic that sent platinum price to $2300 per ounce and palladium to near $600 in short order.

While the world's attention is focused on the Australian flood which disrupts the country's coal supply, causing a big rally in international coal price, few notice that it rains on South Africa's coal mines just as well, just as it did 3 years ago!

Are we setting up for a re-run of the early 2008 PGM panic rally? How is South Africa's electricity grid coping today, comparing with early 2008?

I pointed out that South Africa has reached Peak Coal. So the coal and electricity supply situation in South Africa will get worse, not better, in the coming years.

I pointed out that ESKOM, the semi-governmental national electricity company of South Africa, could not solve the electricity problem because it does not have the money. Even after several boosts of electricity tariff, South Africans are still paying the lowest electricity tariff in the world: about 0.29 rands per kwh, or US$0.04 per kwh, while international coal price is running at $129 per ton and going higher. It costs 0.55kg of coal to generate one kwh of electricity. So if fuel cost is half of the cost of generating electricity, a fair electricity price should be US$0.14 per kwh. According to the latest ESKOM annual report, they paid roughly $25 per ton for coal acquisition. So imagine what kind of low quality discard coal they have been burning over the years if that's the kind of coal price they have been paying!

In response to concerns of ESKOM's coal supply, amid the disruption due to heavy raining, and due to increased export demand, here is what ESKOM said: "Eskom is buying high-quality coal for affected stations and taking steps to improve operating procedures in the coal stockyards. We are upgrading operating processes and procedures for the power station coal stockyard to improve coal handling in wet weather".

I am pretty sure ESKOM is paying $25 per ton and getting the kind of high quality discard coal, wet and mixed with free dirty mud, while the Chinese and Indians, turned away from Australian coal export harbors, are paying $125 per ton and they are getting the low quality coal with no freebie dirts. I will believe that ESKOM is getting guaranteed supply of high quality coal, when I see that they are paying a price that tops the offers of the Indians and the Chinese.

I think we are probably set up for a re-run of the 2008 PGM supply panic soon. To leverage this investment opportunity, investors should acquire physical physical platinum and palladium metal bullions and coins, as well as stocks of the only primary PGM mining companies outside South Africa, namely SWC and PAL.

P.S. The author is heavily invested in palladium mining companies SWC and PAL, and has big long positions in coal mining companies PCX, ACI, ICO, etc.

Looming Peak Coal in South Africa and the World

2010-12-27T16:57:00.000-08:00

South Africa is about to reach Peak Coal, or has already passed it. Mean while the world will reach Peak Coal soon, said Cal Tech scientist David Rutledge. Mr. Rutledge surveyed coal production history of major producing counries all the way back to 1880, and applied the math model pioneered by King Hubbert, who accurately predicted the 1971 Peak Oil production in the USA, using his math model. Rutledge concluded that previous estimates of global coal reserves were outdated and too optimistic. He believes that there were roughly 662 billion tons of ultimate recoverable coal reserve on earth, among which 59%, or 400 billion tons, still remain underground. To put the numbers in prospect, the world produces and consumes about 7 billion tons of coal a year. China is responsible for about half of that number, or about 3.5 billion tons.

South Africa produces 242 million tons of coal last year. David Rutledge predicts that South Africa's production will peak in 2011 at 253 million tons a year. Peak Coal in South Africa has huge implication to the global economy and to the supply/demand of a critical natural resource that the world can not be without, especially as we move towards alternative energy solutions. South Africa is responsible for 85% of the world's platinum production and 40% of palladium, two noble metals used extensively as catalysts to cut air pollution from automobile emissions, and as catalysts to produce synthetic fuels and used in fuel cells, among other things.

Peak Coal in South Africa also means Peak PGM for the world, just as the world has an increasing demand of PGM metals for the environmental and alternative energy needs.

I discussed previously that mining of Platinum Group Metals (PGM), platinum, palladium and rhodium etc., is extremely energy intensive. Based on reports available from South African PGM mining companies like Anglo Platinum (AGPPY.PK), it costs roughly 1x10^10 joules of energy to produce just one troy ounce of PGM metals. That is the direct energy cost. If you include the indirect energy cost, the energy required to build and replace the mining equipments, build and maintain the mine and provide for the mining workers etc, the total energy cost to mine one ounce of platinum or palladium could be five times higher, or roughly 5x10^10 joules.

The 5x10^10 joules total energy cost to produce one ounce of platinum or palladium is equivalent to 13,890 kwh of electricity, or 7.64 metric tons of coal, or 30 barrels of crude oil, or 160,000 cubic feet of natural gas, or 0.556 miligrams of mass. At their recent prices in the US market, these energy commodities would be worth $472 in electricity, or $955 in coal, $655 in natural gas, or $2730 in crude oil. (Calculated using $0.034 per kwh electricity, $125 per ton of coal, $4.09 per thousand cubic feet of natural gas, and $91 per barrel oil.)

Remember in early 2008, electricity shortage almost knocked out the electricity grid in South Africa. The PGM and other mining industry was forced to shut down for 5 days, causing a market panic that sent platinum price to $2300/oz and palladium to near $600/oz.

Has ESKOM, the nation's semi-governmental electricity company, fixed the electricity supply problem in that country? Not by a long stretch! So far ESKOM has not even touched ground to start building any new power plant, even though there has been lots of talks. They promised in 2008 to quickly return three mothballed coal fired power plants back to service in a few months, but the first of the three mothballed power plant did not return to service until October, 2010.

The problem is that ESKOM is financially crippled due to the low electricity tariff in South Africa. Based on their latest annual report, ESKOM burned 122.7 million tons of coal and generated 215940 GWH of electricity, or roughly 0.57 kilograms of coal to generate each kwh of electricity.
Cost of electricity generation was 0.282 rands per kwh, half of which is fuel, mostly coal cost. So ESKOM paid roughly 250 rands per ton for coal, or US$25 per ton, using last year's exchange rate. Current international coal price runs as high as US$125 per ton. Imagine what kind of craps (discard coal) ESKOM burns to generate electricity as they could only pay a fraction of the going market price of coal!

ESKOM is vulnerable to lose its domestic coal supply to international buyers who have insatiable demands and who can pay much higher prices. Look at India with an economy growing at 8% and who faces peak hour electricity shortage of 14%, and who will boost coal import from 80 to 100 million tons next year. The increased will mostly come from South Africa. China is also approaching peak coal. China begins coal import from South Africa just as Asia tops Europe to become South African coal's biggest buyer. China experiences such acute coal shortage in major cities recently that they inadvertently cut power supply to critical oil refineries, resulting in a diesel shortage that crippled the truck transportation, leading to skyrocketing vegetable prices while some produces are left rotting in the fields unharvested.

Let's look at South Africa's coal again. Last year's 242M tons of coal production was mostly used by ESKOM (123-million tonnes), Sasol (40-million tonnes) and export (66-million tonnes). ESKOM's expansion program can use an extra 50M tons while Sasol's new project requires an extra 20M tons annually. And we are also talking about insatiable international demands from India, China and Europe. There is no way South Africa can meet all these coal demands.

Some one has to yield! Who is least capable of affording high coal price, namely, ESKOM, must yield! ESKOM must drastically cut electricity supply and aggressively boost electricity price to stay in business and keep the country's electric grid up and running.

We are not talking about events a few years down the road. These events are rapidly unfolding in front of our eyes now. I have been monitoring coal price and see how it rallied from $90/ton in August, 2010 to now $125/ton, a 40% surge in just 4 months.

What's the implication if ESKOM has to take those drastic measures? The country's energy intensive PGM mining industry will crumble! Simply put, platinum and palladium will have to be produced at much higher cost. The production volume has to be cut dramatically. The PGM mining companies will demand much higher metal prices to compensate for the increased cost to stay in business.

That, of course is bad news for the world, but music to the ears of wise investors who put their money in physical precious metals, palladium and platinum. These two metals, particularly palladium, are the ultimate alternative energy investments as I discussed.

Full disclosure: The author is heavily invested in palladium and owns large long positions in North America's only palladium mining company, Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL). The author is also heavily invested in coal mining company PCX and is looking to buy other coal mining stocks.

Norilsk Nickel's Strategic Moves and Palladium Super Bull

2010-12-08T20:30:00.001-08:00

Russia's Norilsk Nickel, the world's single largest nickel producer who is also responsible for 45% of the world's palladium mine production, made two big strategic moves, one of which escaped everyone's attention except for mine, and another one caused every one's attention but still caught me by a big surprise.

The surprise move is that Norilsk Nickel actually meant it when they said early in the year that they were going to sell their stake in Stillwater Mining (SWC), the only US based palladium and platinum mine, an extremely important strategic asset that Norilsk Nickel acquired in 2004, after going through the trouble of getting two superpower presidents involved in the negotiation, among other things. I could not believe Norilsk Nickel will sell their SWC stake, because Norilsk Nickel and SWC combined gives them the monopoly power of controling more than half of the world's palladium supply. But they did just sell their SWC stake. They acquired their SWC stake for US$100M cash and 877K ounces of palladium, valued at today's market value, their investment did not bring them much profit after all.

What made the Russians change their strategic mind regarding palladium, at a time when palladium price looks spiralling higher by the day? They no longer consider themselves a key palladium supplier to the world in the future?

The Russian riddle is solved when I noticed another less noticed, but much more significant strategic move made by Norilsk Nickel. The story goes back to 2007 when Norilsk Nickel outbid Xstrata to acquire LionOre in an all cash offer worth more than US$6.5B. At the time analysts could not understand why Norilsk Nickel paid such high price for a mining company of limited mineral reserves. The answer became clear only recently, long after the LionOre acquisition, in a Bloomberg news story:

Norilsk Nickel Plans $20 Billion Program to Boost Arctic Output

New Technology

“We’re considering switching from pyro-metallurgy to hydro-metallurgy based on Activox technology,” Muravyov said. Within a year, the company will test whether the technology, which Norilsk bought in 2007 as part of its $6.5 billion LionOre acquisition, will be suitable for Arctic ores. Activox uses chemicals to dissolve nickel from concentrate and then produce the pure metal.

“The cost of applying Activox in Norilsk still needs to be evaluated,” Muravyov said. Installing the technology at all of Norilsk Nickel’s facilities, at a cost of as much as $10 billion, would allow the company to “remove all ecological problems and cut electricity and gas consumption,” he said.

I suddenly had an eureka moment: The Activox Process, originally owned by LionOre, was the real reason for Norilsk acquisition. Norilsk Nickel mine, being one of the top ten most polluted places on earth due to sulphur dioxide and heavy metal emission from the smelters, and facing deteriorating nickel ore grade in coming years, desperately needs this new chemicals based metal producing technology that cuts pollution and production cost drastically.

Except for one catch. Platinum and palladium are very stable and extremely chemical inert metals. Therefore unlike nickel and copper which are easily dis-solved, these two precious metals are virtually impossible to be leached from the mineral ores, using any chemical solution. A demonstration chart of the Activox Process confirms my intuition. The lower left corner of the flow chart indicates that the leach residue, containing the precious metals, are either simply disposed, or be send to alternative precious metal recovery process.

After base metals are extracted, the leach residue would contain virtually all of the original material from the mineral ores: rocks, sands, dirts grinded into fine powder, and wet with all the nasty chemicals mixed in during leaching. It probably contains no more than a few part per million precious metal content. Once again those precious metals: palladium and platinum, are chemically inert and can not be extracted efficiently using any chemical solution. The only way to process them is to use high temperature smelters, which bring back all the air pollution problem and high energy cost, problems that Norilsk wanted to solve in the first place, moving away from smelter based pyrometallurgy towards Activox Process based hydrometallurgy.

The unescapable conclusion is that Norilsk Nickel will become just a low cost nickel and copper producer, and will cease to produce palladium and platinum as byproducts, once they adopt the Activox Process!!! This is true unless palladium and platinum prices are driven to such high levels that it makes economical sense to try to recover the trace amount of precious metals contained in the leach residue despite of the high processing cost!

A technical paper discussing the Activox Process running at the Norilsk Nickel owned Tati plant in Botzwana, written by experts of that plant, confirms my conclusion. The 16 pages technical paper contains not a single word mentioning of either palladium or platinum:

Solvent extraction design consideration for the Tati Activox® plant

This shocking development is very bullish for palladium and is a very good news to fellow palladium investors. We are talking about 45% of the world's supply of palladium removed when Norilsk ceases to produce byproduct PGM metals. Of course, I do not expect this paradigm shift to occur overnight. But shouldn't it be time that precious metal investors leverage the opportunity to hoard the palladium metal and ride the palladium super bull up to the moon, and mean while industry users like GM (GM), FORD (F) and TOYOTA (TM) need to start panic now and build their strategic palladium inventories before it is too late. If 4% of shortage was enough to drive rhodium price from $300-ish to $11000 per ounce, I don't know how high palladium price can go to if we have more than 50% shortage in the global supply!!!

Maybe, just maybe, the recent remarkable surge of palladium price indicates that some investors out there have already figured out what the Activox Process means to Norilsk Nickel and to global palladium supply, and are already quietly loading up while keeping their lips sealed.

Full disclosure: The author has studied global palladium market for a few years and is heavily invested in physical palladium metal, as well as in stocks of the world's only primary palladium mining companies: SWC and PAL. The author has no position in Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK).

Grave Warnings to Precious Metal Investors - Buyer Beware!

2010-11-10T14:08:00.000-08:00

I am a palladium bug, not a silver bug or gold bug. Although I do like silver and gold and I like all precious metal investments. My favorite remains palladium. But regardless what precious metal you like best, I urge all precious metal investors to own ONLY physical metals and stocks of their favorite precious metal mining companies.

I strongly discourage owning any Exchange Traded Funds, ETFs that invest only on future contracts or other paper instruments. I cited UNG and USO as perfect bad examples. At a point of time UNG was once the second largest long position in my portfolio, right after SWC. I still can not help but pad myself on my back for promptly realizing the fundamental problem with a paper based "commodity" ETF such as UNG, and sold without hesitation. Had I held UNG till this day I would have been much poorer. Unfortunately such ETF funds continue to make many unsuspect investors poorer by the day. So I urge every investor to carefully read why paper based ETFs do not work.

I do expect that 99% of the people will attack my view point that paper ETFs will not work. I don't mind as I know 99% of the people simply could not grasp the concept until they have lost all their money. I will be very happy if 1% of people feel that I have helped them to avoid costly mistakes and to make smart investment decisions.

Like advocators Jim Sinclair and Ted Butler, I always encourage people to directly own physical precious metals. I do not trust the physical gold ETF, GLD, and the physical silver ETF, SLV. Like some other folks I expressed skeptism whether these funds actually hold the physical precious metals as they claimed. These ETF funds were hosted by entities known to be hostile to precious metal investors and known to have large short positions in silver so why should people trust them? At one point I went so far as scrutinizing the almost 10,000 pages long silver bars list posted by iShares Silver Trust (SLV), and discovered plenty of red flags.

But what I just discovered may shock the raw core out of every SLV investors' shells. If you read the following and you still feel comfortable investing in SLV, and do not feel a need to scrutinize the fund a little bit more yourself, then maybe you are too numb to even invest money in the dangerous marketplace of today, and it is probably a good thing you lose money, if indeed this is exposed to be one of the biggest scam of our time.

This is a nuclear bomb I am dropping, so before I continue let me make a few things clear for my own legal protection. I am a US Citizen with constitutional right to free speech, and conscious forces me to speak out. I do not have a short position in SLV and stands for no monetary gain out of this disclosure. I am a supporter of precious metal investments and want to see higher silver price. I have no vested interest against any entity involved, other than that I insist seeing honesty and integrity of all involved parties.

That said, I have noticed that iShare recently hired an independent auditor to inspect the silver bars in their vault, and issue audit certificates such as this most recent one. I urge you to follow the link to immediately download a copy of the inspection certificate and save it on your computer, lest it disappear soon! The auditor, Inspectorate International Limited, is a very reputable commodity inspector for 150 years in the business. Very good! I welcome iShare's move to hire a reputable auditor to look at their silver bars and disclose it to the public. If you trust Inspectorate, and they visited iShare vaults and come back to tell us they see all the silver bars stored in the vaults, then it should put all skeptism at rest and people should feel safe to invest in SLV shares, right?

Not so fast! Not so dandy fast and easy, I say folks! Look at this Audit Certificate once again. It's only two pages. Print it out, friend. But Inspectorate is a big company and it just so happens that the same Mr. Paul Alston, a nice and respectable English gentlemen, was also hired to do audit for GoldMoney.com, and issued audit reports like this, this, this, this and most recently this.

Do you see anything unusual, folks, when you compare the two pages SLV audit report and the 14+ pages GoldMoney audit reports, alleged done by the same Mr. Paul Alston?

1. SLV has a two page lousy report that says almost nothing, while GoldMoney has much more elaborate reports detailing every aspect of the inspection process, including such seemingly unimportant information like the brand of the sale used for weighing, even though SLV has way much more silver to be inspected.

2.Inspectorate issued a paper audit certificate to GoldMoney and they have to use an awkward optical scanner to scan the image of the paper certificate and post on the web. More awkwardly, the brits use a paper size narrower than standard American letter size, thus the scanning exposes the ugly paper edge, telling the size of the margin to the edge of the paper. Wouldn't it be nice to do like what iShare did, create a nice and clean electronic PDF document, leaving no trace of the paper, and just digitally embed the Inspectorate logo, and an image of Mr. Paul Alston's signature? Except that anybody with a computer can do it. It's not hard to find a sample image of Mr. Paul Alston's signature off the web, right? (Don't try it at home, kids!)

3.Unfortunately Bank of New York Mellon is in America and speaks a different kind of English than the one spoken by Mr. Paul Alston, a nice British gentleman. And the vaults are supposed to be in England. They forgot such unimportant details and let a lousy American created that Inspectorate Report. Congradulations on getting the paper size to be the correct A4 size, but they need to work on small details, for example Inspectorate would not begin the sentence with "The Bank of New York" as the sentence subject and would not use the ® mark when referring to third party names, and the British would refer a date as 7^th of July, 2010, not in the lousy American style July 7, 2010. I encourage them to really spend some time studying how Inspectorate issue their audit certificates. They should have done that before they post it.

I will stop here and let people draw their own conclusions. But I do NOT for a single bit believe that Mr. Paul Alston himself personally counted and inspected 308,542 pieces of silver bars, and sampled and measured each one bar out of each pallet of 30 bars all by himself and his gangs, and issued that SLV audit certificate and signed his name on it. Not a bit at all.

Full Disclosure: The author is fully invested in mining stock SWC, PAL and precious metal palladium. The author also holds physical silver and silver mining stocks like SSRI, CDE and HL, but has no position in ETF funds GLD, SLV, UNG and USO.

Peak Oil, Alternative Energy and Platinum Group Metals

2010-10-24T14:49:00.000-07:00

The world's attention is increasingly turning towards alternative energy as the reality of Peak Oil is sinking in, even though the public discussion of Peak Oil is still only just wispering, with majority of investors unware of the looming global crisis.

Fossil fuels are cheap and convenient: they are easily produced, and the fuels themselves serve two purposes at the same time: They are both energy source, and energy storage. When you fill up your car with 15 gallons of gasoline, you acquires both the energy needed to drive your car a few hundred miles, as well as ways to store the energy: the energy is stored in the gasoline until it is burned in the internal combustion engine.

Any alternative energy development must address these two issues as well: energy source, and energy storage. Alternative energy sources we talk about, like solar, wind, ocean wave, nuclear, addresses only the problem of energy source, but not the energy storage.

While scientists are making some progress in developing high energy density batteries, the basic physics is that energy density in any battery could never come even close to the chemical energy density in either hydrogen, or carbohydrate fuels. The best energy storage solution we can find is to synthesize carbohydrate fuels using energy derived from solar, wind, nuclear or coal fired power plants. Such synthesized carbohydrate fuel can then be transported using the existing infrastructure before they can be utilized. Finally, fuel cell batteries can extract energy from the carbohydrates and turn it into electricity energy, at an efficiency much higher than simply burning them in a combustion engine.

So this is the alternative energy recipe scientists have given us:

First electricity is generated from alternative energy sources like solar, wind, ocean wave, nuclear, hydropower, etc.

Second electricity is used to synthesize carbohydrate fuels, allowing the stored energy to be easily transported and utilized.

Third fuel cells are used to generate electricity from carbohydrate fuels to provide end energy usage, like driving a vehicle or other electricity driven machines.

Do you realize that for steps 2 and 3 to be possible, a category of rare and expensive precious metals are need. You need the so called PGMs (Platinum Group Metals), namely platinum and palladium. These two metals serve as catalysts in synthesizing cabohydrate fuels. They also serve as catalysts in fuel cell batteries.

Among the two PGM metals, palladium is probably even more important. Palladium is very unique in its extreme affinity to hydrogen: one volume of palladium is capable of absorbing 900 times the volume of hydrogen. Such extreme affinity to hydrogen makes palladium an ideal catalyst in any chemical process that involves hydrogen, including, of course, the chemical process to synthesize carbohydrate fuels, or the chemical process to turn carbohydrate fuel into water, carbon dioxide and electricity, as it happens in fuel cells. There is no shortage of efforts by scientists to look for alternatives to the expensive platinum and palladium, in the last one hundred years. Unfortunately no practical substitute could be found so far.

No wonder when President Bush advocated hydrogen economy in a State of the Union address in 2003, some one reminded us that you can NOT have a hydrogen economy without palladium, and that the USA is lucky to have one of the world's only two primary palladium mines: the Stillwater Mine (SWC) in Montana. The other palladium mine is North American Palladium (PAL). Read "The Russians Are Coming" by Mother Jones.

Recently there is an investor mania in the sector of rare earth metals, just like the one in solar energy a few years ago, due to recent news that China is limiting production and export of rare earth metals. The rare earth metals mania is not without a good reason. The alternative energy development is a huge investment theme due to Peak Oil. In the alternative energy development, you need efficient electric motors to turn mechanical energy (like wind power or hydropower) into electricity and turn electricity into mechanical power (like in a hybrid car), and you need high energy density batteries to store the electricity energy. The high density batteries need rare earth metals. To make the strong magnets needed to build electric motors, you need rare earth metals. Not to mention the advanced electronics technology need rare earth metal as well. No wonder the whole world panicked when China begin to cut back rare earth metals expert quotas, and there is an investor mania to rush into potential rare earth mining plays like MCP, REE, AVARF.PK and UURAF.PK these days.

But let me be clear: rare earth metals are not rare at all. China could not cut the world off on rare earth metals even if she wants to. There are plenty of rare earth resources else where in the world that can be developed. They just won't be cheap.

But here are these two other metals that are truely rare, and that all alternative energy technology more critically depend on, and which China has zero domestic sources. China runs the danger of being cut off by the world on these two critical metals if there is a resource war.

Those two metals, as I just mentioned, are palladium and platinum. Supply of these two metals concentrate in just a few spots in the world: Russia's Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK) mine, South Africa PGM mines, and these two palladium mines in North America: SWC and PAL. Price of platinum but even more so that of palladium, have been surging up relentlessly due to strong supply/demand fundamentals. China, Japan and other nations without their domestic sources of these two metals, better begin to think about accumulate their strategic reserved of these two critical strategic industry and war time metals.

Likewise, investors would do much better hoarding physical palladium metal bullions, than hoarding a basket of 2 dozen different rare earth metals and not knowing which one will do best in the near future.

In the next two articles I will talking about how effects of resource peaking in two countries will impact global supply of platinum and palladium catastrophically, causing market panick in the near future, sending prices of these two metals surging to unimaginable high levels:

Peak Coal in South African and the Global PGM Supply

-How South Africa is running out of coal. How booming India coal demand will deplete South Africa's coal supply. And how these will impact South Africa's electricity supply and therefore constraint that country's platinum and palladium supply.

Peak Nickel in Russia and the Russian Checkmate on Palladium

-The Russian checkmate on global palladium supply are in two aspects: First the end of Russia strategic palladium stockpile sale, due to the stockpile depletion. Second, palladium production of Russia's Norilk Nickel (NILSY.PK) mine declines dramatically, as ore grade deteriorates. Third, More shockingly, Norilsk Nickel is now considering the more cost effective Activox Process technology, which it acquired by spending US$6.5B to acquire LionOres a few years ago. The Activox Process will dramatically cut sulphur dioxide pollution. But the new technology will only extract base metals nickel and copper, leaving platinum and palladium in the residue un-extracted, unless the price is high enough to provide the economic incentives to extract the precious metals using alternative approaches. This change would be a catastrophic loss of global palladium supply and will be sure to cause market panic.

Full Disclosure: The author has large long positions in palladium mining stocks SWC and PAL, in addition to silver mining stocks like SSRI, CDE, HL, and coal mining stocks PCX and ACI. The author has no position in rare earth metal plays REE and MCP.

The Ultimate Energy Investments

2010-10-05T10:38:00.000-07:00

You read that title right, I am talking about The Ultimate Energy Investments, not the "Alternative Energy" investments. Alternative energy is a very sexy word to the ears of investors, in recent years. I am all for alternative energy developments. But I am not a big fan of most of the alternative energy developments. They are too costly in terms of energy and money invested, in terms of energy return, and none of them can be ramped up quickly to meet even a fraction of energy demands in today's global economy. I believe LENR, or Cold Fusion, which involves precious metal palladium, is humanity's only solution to Peak Oil energy crisis.

We face the Peak Oil reality, a reality that the total energy supply of the world will begin to decline, instead of continue to increase. The world must cope with and live within the reality of ever declining energy supply, until a new abundant energy source can be developed to replace the depleting fossil fuels of the earth.

It makes sense to hoard something when supply is in shortage. Wouldn't it be nice to physically hoard energy itself, as a commodity investment? This is why I gave the title of this article as "The Ultimate Energy Investments". Yes I am talking about HOARDING ENERGY itself.

How do you hoard energy? Energy is invisible, has no shape or form. Energy price is still cheap but it won't stay cheap. One kilowatt hour of electricity is worth about 5 US cents at whole sale. You can hoard energy by storing it in a battery, but it is an ineffective investment: One set of Toyota Prius hybrid car batteries, costing a few thousand dollars, stores about 500 watt hour of energy fully charged, or less than 3 cents worth of energy. Is it so impossible to hoard energy?

It is not possible to hoard energy directly, but it is possible to hoard energy indirectly. It can be a very good investment. Energy drives all activities of the society. All goods or services we produce or consume ultimately depends on energy in one way or another, directly and indirectly. When you take a hair cut in a barber's shop it costs lots of energy: Electricity is used to drive the hair clipper. The hair clipper itself is made of plastic and metal parts. You need energy to produce the plastic and produce the metal from minerals. You need energy to turn raw plastic and metal into parts and then assembly into a hair clipper. The barber needs to eat food. You need energy to produce the fertilizer needed to grow grocery foods that the barbers and every one of us consume daily. Everything costs energy.

The ultimate energy investments are investments in commodities that cost a huge amount of energy to produce in the first place. Such commodities may be extremely rare, and can be very expensive, reflecting the huge amount of energy it costs to produce these commodities.

Precious metals, particularly PGM metals, platinum and palladium, are such ultimate energy hoarding investments, because these metals cost huge amount of energy to produce. According to the annual report of Anglo Platinum (AGPPY.PK), the direct electrical energy cost of producing just one ounce of PGM metal, is almost 7GJ in 2008, or 7x10^9 Joules. In terms of electricity that's roughly 2000 kilowatt hours of electricity to produce just one ounce of PGM metal. At retail electricity rate of US$0.15 per KWH, it costs US$300 just in direct energy cost to produce one ounce of PGM metals. Indirect energy cost, e.g. the energy cost to produce the mining equipments, explore and develop the mine, as well as costs to pay salary to feed the mining workers and their families, is probably several times higher.

I guestimate that all direct and indirect energy cost combined, it costs about 10,000 KWH of electricity worth of energy to produce one ounce of platinum or palladium, or the equivalence to the energy contained in six tons of coal.

ONE OUNCE of PGM metal equals SIX TONS of coal. Remember that and think about it!

The platinum engagement ring you bought for your wife contains about 1/6 of an ounce of platinum. It costed one ton of coal to produce the metal. Your wife is wearing one metric ton of coal right on her ring finger. Just tell her that there is one ton of coal sitting on her finger!!!

When you buy a one ounce platinum or palladium coin, you have hoarded 6 tons of coal under your pillow, without taking up any space in your backyard. When South Africa exports one ounce of PGM, they consume six tons of their coal. By the time South Africa depletes its coal reserves, they won't be able to produce a single more ounce of PGM metal, even if there is still be plenty of metal lying underground.

As energy becomes more expensive, it costs more to produce the precious metals. The value of a physical asset is generally decided by the replacement production cost, the ounces of precious metal you hoard will grow more valuable over time, as Peak Oil starts to take its toll in societies.

Isn't it great that you can hoard energy itself, by simply hoarding bullions of precious metals, without costing space in your backyard to store a small mountain of coal! Just remember this: one ounce of platinum or palladium equals to six metric tons of coal.

The concept can be applied to other precious metals and base metals. Gold production is also extremely energy intensive, having to sort through tons of rocks to extract just a fraction of an ounce of gold. One base metal that is tightly correlated to energy cost, is aluminum. There is no scarcity in the raw material to produce aluminum. Aluminum production is merely a matter of applying electricity energy to separate the aluminum metal by electrolysis. When you buy an aluminum bar, you bought a certain amount of electricity, stored in the metal, in the form of energy consumed to produce the metal.

If you want to hoard electricity, you can hoard aluminum bars instead. I do not know how many kilwatt hour of electricity it costs to produce one kilogram of aluminum. Probably you can check the annual reports of producers like Alcoa Inc. (AA) or Aluminum Corp. of China (ACH) to find out. One thing is sure, as electricity price goes up, so will the cost of aluminum production, and so will the market price of the metal.

Recently, another energy source, natural gas, has become a hot topic of discussion in the investor community. I agree with the general sentiments that current natural gas price is unreasonably too low in comparison with other energy sources. Current natural gas price does not fairly reflect the production cost, particularly the shale gas production cost. The low price is unsustainable. It must go up soon.

What can you buy to invest in natural gas, besides producers like CHK, COG, APC, PETD? Many people talk about natural gas ETF funds like UNG, FCG, UNL, WCAT. I must point out that people should NOT touch any of these ETFs that are based on nothing but paper. Ask managers of these ETF funds: Do you hoard even one cubic feet of natural gas? Do you have any facility they can show you that contains natural gas? If they don't have the physical goods, then they only have worthless papers created out of thin air by counter-parties. I have learned my lesson in UNG, fortunately without suffering any loss. I argued why people should NOT invest in UNG, USO, or any other paper based ETFs. It is extremely important that you read it and try to understand the difference between paper and physical goods.

Is there no way to hoard physical natural gas for an investment? Well, there IS a good way of hoarding natural gas, without giant steel storage tanks. Natural gas is used to produce a very important agriculture commodity whose other raw material for production is free: the air! It's called urea, a nitrogen fertilizer. The nitrogen comes from the air. The hytrogen, as well as the energy needed to produce urea, comes from natural gas. No other raw material is involves. Urea is stable, safe and cost effective to store. By hoarding urea, you are hoarding natural gas in solid form. Current urea price is at multi-year low, reflecting the current low natural gas price and therefore the low production cost of urea. The urea price must go up when natural gas price goes up, and when global food demand goes up, driving more urea demand in agriculture.

Go ahead to hoard urea at current low price if you want to invest in physical natural gas.

As for me, I have been a long term advocater of palladium investment. There is now even more reason to invest in palladium, besides the bullish factors I have talked about repeatedly. At current price of only $578/oz, it is nice to know that one ounce of palladium represents at least six metric tons of coal, right at your finger tip. Since the December, 2008 lows of precious metals, the performance of palladium has beaten other precious metals: gold, silver and platinum. Palladium will continue to outperform the other precious metals, until at least it reaches a price parity with platinum.

Not to mention that there are hundreds of gold or silver mining stocks to pick from, notably like ABX, GG, AU, NEM, PAAS, SSRI, CDE, HL, just to name a few.

When it comes to platinum, there are much fewer choices: AGPPY.PK, IMPUY.PK, LNMIY.PK, AGPBF.PK and NMPNF.PK.

When it comes to palladium, the only primary mining plays available is Stillwater Mining (SWC), and North American Palladium (PAL).

Full Disclosure: The author holds shares in SWC as the largest long position. The author also holds shares in PAL, SSRI, CDE, PAAS, HL, PCX. The author hoards physical palladium metal but currently has no plan to hoard physical urea due to lack of suitable market access. The author has no long or short position in any of the ETF funds mentioned.

The Pitfalls of Almost Every ETF Investments

2010-09-14T10:40:00.000-07:00

I am telling you something every investor should know, but no one has told you! Even the most successful investors like Warren Buffet or Jim Rogers has failed to tell you this important investment rule that you are about to hear from me. I believe Jim Rogers does not intend to withholding his investment knowhow from you, but he truely does NOT actually get it himself. It took me a while to get it as well.

When Jim Rogers pitched agriculture commodities and urged people to buy future contracts of those commodities, he did NOT know what he was talking about! I hope that some one close to Mr. Jim Rogers can bring my words to him and explain why he was wrong. I have high respect to Mr. Jim Rogers and I hope he gets what I am about to tell below. This is an investment mistake 99% of people make, including Jim Rogers himself.

If you believe something is bullish and want to invest in it, then you MUST own it outright.

Allowing some one else to own your investments for you, simply won't cut it. Owning something "indirectly", for example, by purchasing futures contracts, won't cut it, either. If you don't hold something outright, physically, under your own control, then you really don't own it. If you don't own something outright, then all you have is merely a piece of promise, written on a piece of paper. You are owning merely paper assets, not the physical assets. You should reject all assets that rely on a promise printed on a piece of paper, because a promise can be created out of thin air, and can just as easily vanish into thin air, with little or no repercussion to the one who breaks the promises, but tremendous loss to you who wrongly trusted that promise. Let me explain.

But first let me clarify that owning equities, i.e., owning shares of stocks of publicly traded companies, is NOT owning paper asset. The company, like the Stillwater Mining Company whose stock I own, is a real physical business entity, if I push a computer button to buy shares of SWC through TD AmeriTrade, I do own a small piece of that company. My ownership is recognized as legitimate. If I have any doubt I can request physical stock certificate. If there is still any doubt regarding the ownership, then the stock should not be bought. So let's make it clear, equities, as long as the ownership is not in question, are physical assets, not paper assets.

But all indirect ownership of physical assets, or ownership of derivatives of physical assets, are paper assets because they rely on a promise made by some body, written on a piece of paper. Take for example the physical gold ETF, the GLD, and physical silver ETF, the SLV. The respective investment prospectus claims these funds are backed by physical gold and silver, and hence owning shares of these two ETFs are equivalent to owning actual physical precious metal.

Maybe these ETFs are really backed by physical metals, maybe not. We don't know. All I know is by owning shares of either GLD and SLV, you are NOT owning physical gold or silver. Not at all. You are owning something which is based on a mere promise, a promise that some how some where in a secret location in the world there are a pile of gold or silver bars and those bars really do belong to you, but you have no way of knowing and you have no access to it. Those physical precious metal bars might as well be put on the moon and you can point to the moon and tell your grandsons that you really do own something on the moon, and that some one promised it to you, you just don't have control or access to it.

Make no mistake about it: You are owning a piece of promise, not a piece of metal, by owning GLD or SLV. It's up to you to decide how much you can trust that promise and how much you value it. But to me, I don't even trust my best friend to hold a few palladion coins for me, why should I trust some guys that I don't even know personally to hold my precious metal in a fund called GLD and SLV? In the past I scrutinized the metal bars list of SLV and raised plenty of red flags. I determined that regardless whether those red flags have legitimate explanations, it is not worth risking my own investments to count on some Santa Clause keep a good promise.

Another categories of ETF funds are even worse. The GLD and SLV fund at least claims to be backed up by physical assets. But there are ETF funds which are backed up by nothing but paper. Most notably are the USO fund for crude oil, and UNG fund for natural gas. The USO fund does not own a single drop of oil and the UNG fund does not own a single cubic of natural gas. They own future contracts, i.e., promises made by some one, not physical commodities digged out of ground. Why do people buy these two funds and then expect to make profits when prices of the underlining comodity goes up, if there is not an ounce of the actual stuff involved? They don't. I recognized that fundamental fact on Oct. 29, 2009. I advise you to read that article again. It was a very important lesson I learned.

Lucky for me, once I recognize why the investment based on paper will not work, I quickly unwinded my entire investment in UNG, which was once the second largest position I held, without suffering any loss, and I never touched it again. In hind sight I have chills in my spine thinking what could happen had I not timely realized what's wrong with UNG, and other similar paper based ETF funds. Unlucky for many investors who still buy such paper ETFs thinking they are investing on the right thesis of bullish commodities, or bearish US dollar. These investors suffered great losses and will continue to suffer losses in the future, until they realize the problem with owning paper, or untill they lose all their money, whichever comes first.

Notice what the prices of crude oil and natural gas were doing, since the low of March, 2009, and what were the share prices of USO and UNG doing, during the same period? Do I need to bring your attention to what FAZ and FAS has been doing over the long term? They are supposed to be a pair of opposite financial ETFs and they are supposed to run in the opposite directions, but over the long term, both run down. Same story with UUP and UDN, the dollar up and dollar down funds. In short term they indeed run opposite to each other, but in longer term, both runs in the same dorection: downward. All those are paper instruments based on nothing but mere promises made by counter parties. So why should any one expect to make money out these papers? Why do you think those counterparties are nice Santa Clauses ready to deliver profits to you happily? They don't. These paper instruments are gamblings, not investments.

There have been recent criticisms on UNG, on GLD and on SLV, and even on USO. I share some of the criticisms on these ETF funds. But no one on Seeking Alpha has really touched the more fundamental reasons why paper-based, or promise-based ETFs, are fundamentally wrong as investment vehicles, regardless of the bullish fundamentals of the underlining commodities.

When it comes to investments, if you don't hold it, you don't own it. Please pause and think about it. Hopefully you learn something. Hopefully next time Mr. Jim Rogers tells you to buy agriculture commodity future's contracts, you can help me to explain to him why he was wrong; why people should not buy this index or that index, or this or that ETF, or buy future contracts or other derivatives. Hoarding the physical stuff is the only correct way to invest in a commodity.

I still remember when I first pitched physical tellurium investment, many analysts, some well known, immediately asked me where they can buy tellurium futures contracts. I should have told them that I am quite happy to write up and sell them some tellurium futures contracts, at good prices, but they are not going to make money out of me. If you want to make money from tellurium, you have to purchase and hoard physical tellurium, just like I did. It is true for all commodities. It is true for all investments. If you don't hold it, you don't own it.

Therefore I reject virtually all ETF investments as legitimate long term investment vehicles. If you want to invest in precious metals, you have to own the real metals, or own stocks of the related mining companies. I am happy to see that I am now vindicated and will continue to do well in my insistence that palladium will be the best precious metal to invest in, and my insistence on the only known primary palladium producers, SWC and PAL. It was not a love affair. It was a firm conclusion from my own objective investment analysis. I just wish that if investors are bullish on palladium, they should go out of their ways and purchase any ounce of physical palladium they can find, instead of counting on buying palladium future contracts.

Full Disclosures: The author owns SWC as the largest position on his investment portfolio, and is invested in physical palladium metal. The author does not have position in USO, UNG, GLD, SLV, FAS, FAZ, TBT, UUP, UDN, and does not intend to enter any position either. Although the author hoards physical tellurium and is skeptical of FSLR, he holds no position in FSLR.

BP Well Pressure Test Proves a Leak Exists Under Seabed!

2010-07-18T18:01:00.000-07:00

BP scientists puzzled on why closing the new sealing cap of the Macondo well did not raise the well pressure to the expected 8000 to 9000 PSI pressure, but reached only 6700 PSI after the first 24 hours and 6745 PSI after 48 hours. If the well did not leak underground, with oil from the underground reservoir could only gush into the well but not leak out of it, the pressure should promptly reach equilibrium with the reservoir pressure. The reading at the sealing cap should then reach between 8000 to 9000 PSI, calculated based on reservoir pressure which is estimated based on conditions when the well blew out on April 20, 2010.

BP scientists offer only two possible explanations:
1. There is a significant underground leak from the well.
2. The oil reservoir pressure has dropped due to depletion from 80 days of spill.

I believe the pressure deficiency clearly indicates there is a big leak underground. Almost every one fail to notice to another data which is more important, and more disturbing: Why it is so slow for the pressure to approach its final equilibrium level. It's been more than two days and the pressure still hasn't fully stabilized yet! If the well has no leak, since the volume of oil in the well is small, and the liquid oil is hardly compressible, the well pressure should promptly raise to equilibrium level and stabilize within a few minutes after the sealing cap is shut off.

Let me explain the basic physics how fast the pressure in the well should raise, after the valves at the new sealing cap is shut off. If the well is not leaking, then all the oil already in the well has no where to go. Mean while at the bottom, the oil from reservoir continue to gush into the well. As the oil from reservoir squeezes in it builds up the pressure. This continues until the pressure reaches equiulibrium with the reservoir, and then there is no more oil getting in or out of the well any more and the pressure is stabilized.

How fast the pressure builds up to equilibrium level depends on three things:

1. How fast the reservoir oil can gush in under the pressure difference. The faster the oil gushes, the faster the pressure builds up.

2. How big a volume the oil in the well is confined to. The more room there is, the longer it takes to squeeze in extra oil to build up the pressure.

3. How compressible is the oil. The less compressible the oil is, the harder it is squeeze extra oil into the volume and therefore the faster the pressure reaches equilibrium.

Based on the estimate that reservoir oil was gushing into the well at a flow rate of 50,000 barrels per day, the total confined volume of oil the well is no more than 6500 barrels. And the compressibility of that amount of oil (liquid is not very compressible!) gives no more than 50 barrels extra space under full pressure. It takes roughly 3 * 50/50,000 of one day, or roughly 5 minutes, for the pressure in the well to build up to equilibrium level.

But now it's taking much longer than 5 minutes, and the pressure is far from stabilized yet. At the start the pressure was at 5000 feet deep water pressure level, or 2250 PSI. After the first 24 hours it reached 6700 PSI. After 48 hours it was 6745 PSI. After 72 hours it was 6775 PSI. Now after 4 days it's nearly 6800 PSI. The fact it is raising so slowing, and the pressure fails to stabilize, is a very troubling sign.

The data tells us that the oil is confined in a volume way much bigger than just the well itself. As the oil gushes into the well, it simutaneously leaks out of the well, through a pierced opening, into a way much bigger pocket of storage within the seabed rocks. This is why the pressure builds up extremely slowly. Lots of oil is being squeezed out through the leak point into the giant pocket in the seabed, to build up the pressure there slowly over time.

There is no question that the well casing is compromised and there is a huge leak some where in the well casing.

So why can't BP spot any seepage of oil out of the sea floor, if the oil is leaking out of the well into the seabed? That's because the well itself is 3 miles deep under the sea floor. If the oil seeps through the seabed and leak out from sea floor, it does not necessarily come out of the vicinity of the well site. It can come out at ANY spot within a roughly 3 miles radius from the well site. That is a pretty wide area to look for leaks. It is also pitch dark at the sea floor, the ROV video camera must use artificial lighting and can not see more than a living room's area of sea floor at at time.

if there is one single leak out of the sea floor within a 3 mile radius, it will take forever for BP to discover it using those under-sea ROVs. If BP find one leak, that means there must be hundreds of un-discovered leaks out of the sea floor!

What should BP do? BP should publicly publish detailed profile of pressure change over time, since the beginning of the pressure test. Let the experts look at the data and build physics model to discover what teh data tells us, and debate the scientific question whether there is a leak and how big the leak is, and/or whether the leak has penetrated all the way to the sea floor.

As for the relief wells, if the well casing has been dameged, then there is no point to proceed with the relief wells any more. Once the relief well is pierced through to the wild well, BP will continue to lose mud throught the leak in the wild well. Once all the mud is lost, BP will have a blowout at the relief wells, causing a much bigger disaster than the existing one.

It's time for BP to be honest with itself, publish all information and invite experts around the world to deal with the problem together. This is a disaster that BP can not handle on its own.

Full Disclose: The author currently owns a small short position of BP. But my main stock portfolio are on long positions on my favorite palladium mining stocks, SWC and PAL, as well as silver mining stocks such as SSRI, CDE, PAAS. The author does intend to increase BP shorts over time, if there is significant recovery of the BP stock price.

Warning to BP: Stop the Relief Wells Or Expect a Much Bigger Catastrophe!

2010-07-08T12:43:00.000-07:00

I issue a serious warning to BP: Stop it right now, do NOT drill the last few feet of the relief wells. Do NOT punch that hole through. Think everything through very carefully! If BP proceeds to puncture the hole through to the original blowout well, it opens up a Pandora's Box which may lead to a much bigger catastrophe than any one has ever bargained for!

BP must halt now and invite all experts for a good debate on exactly what could happen. Build a computer model and test all scenaries. Build a physical model and run tests on it. BP is foolhardy to just proceed and pray/gamble for a success. Because what could happen is not just another failure, but rather a much bigger catastrophe!

BP explains how a relief well works. You drill another well nearby which intercepts and punches a hole through the casing of the original well, at 18000 feet below sea level, or 135,000 feet below the sea floor. Then heavy mud is injected through the relief well into the original blowout well, filing it up from near the bottom. Since the density of the mud is heavy, the gravity of the mud column generates a pressure enough to counters the pressure of the oil and gas from the reservoir, hence the oil/gas flowis stopped. Once the oil/gas flow is stopped the well can then be sealed off using cement.

It sounds simple. But due the the extreme depth of the well and the extreme pressure from the reservoir, some technical details makes the plan virtually impossible to work. Let me explain.

For the plan to work. BP needs to ensure several things:
1. The mud must have a density heavy enough to counter the pressure of the oil from the reservoir and to stop the flow of oil from the reservoir.

2. The mud must be pumped into the junction point fast enough to prevent it from being diluted by oil and gas coming from the reservoir. See condition 1.

3. The mud must not be too heavy that it seeps down into the fracture of rocks, damaging the rock formation, fracturing the sea floor which releases oil and gas in an uncontrolable way.

4. BP must have enough mud at hand. If it ever runs out of mud it's game over for BP. But not so much mud that it all go down into the rock fractures and causes the sea floor to rupture. See condition 3 again.

I don't see how BP can pull it off.

For the discussion below, let's keep one thing in mind, when liquid flows thorugh a path, pressure drops the further you go alone the path. Part of the pressure is lost to overcome the resistance to the flow. The higher the viscosity (sticker) is, the narrower the flow path is, the more pressure drops along the path. On the other hand, if the liquid is not flowing, then there is no pressure drop due to liquid flowing.

In the first phase of operation, mud is injected from the relief well through the junction point into the blowout well, expelling the oil and gas originally in the blowout well out of the exit point, while stopping the flow of oil and gas from the reservoir below.

When the oil from reservoir is to seep through the rock fractures and then gush out of the blow out well, the pressure at the junction point is way much lower than the reservoir pressure, because it is much harder for the oil to seep through the rock fractures then to flow through the blowout well. Hence more pressure is lost at the rock fractures, than the pressure loss needed to push the oil up through the well. What it means is once the oil below the junction point stops, the pressure at the junction point quickly raises to a much higher level. And BP needs to be able to counter this much higher junction pressure and still be able to push the mud in.

Now consider the path of the mud. It is pushed down the relief well and then it pushes the oil and gas up the blowout well. Note the exit point is free flowing. The pressure of the mud must be high enough that while the mud is flowing at very high rate, it still generate high enough pressure at the junction point to fight the static pressure from the oil in the reservoir. That goal is extremely hard to achieve, because most of the mud pressure is lost in pushing the mud through the resistance of the relief well.

Likewise, the original oil and gas must be pushed to gush out of the blowout well even faster than the free flowing rate, to generate enough back pressure to push back the oil coming from the reservoir. Failing that, the oil will continue to flow from below to mix with the mud, hence diluting the mud entering the blowout well. This, again, is virtually impossible for BP to achieve. We are talking about pushing the mud in at more than twice the rate how free flowing oil and gas gushes out of the blowout well.

To put things into formulas, let's call the pressure at the junction point Pj:

Formula One, Junction Pressure from the Relief Well:
(1) Pj = P(Pump) + P(Mud Column) - Q2(Mud Flow) * Rm(Mud Resistance in Relief Well)

Formula TWO, Junction Pressure from the Blowout Well:
(2) Pj = P(Sea Floor) + P(Oil Column) + Q2(Oil Flow) * Ro(Oil Resistance in Blowout Well)

Formula THREE, Junction Pressure from the oil from the Reservoir:
(3) Pj = P(Reservoir) - P(Oil Below) - Zero (Oil below not flowing)

Let's define net pressures, which is the pressures the three source of liquid would generate at the junction point if we put a flow stopper there, as such:

P(Net Relief Well) = P(Pump) + P(Mud Column)
P(Net Reservoir) = P(Reservoir) - P(Oil Below)
P(Net Blowout Well) = P(Sea Floor) + P(Oil Column)

The relationships can be re-written as such:

(4) (P(Net Relief) - P(Net Reservoir))/(P(Net Blowout) - P(Net Reservoir))
= Rm(Mud Resistance in Relief Well)/Ro(Oil Resistance in Blowout Well)

Let me explain it in layman's English. Let's imagine the reservoir is directly connected to the junction point with no resistance to the flow movement in either direction. The net force that pushes the mud down into the oil reservoir must be pushing the mud down at the same rate that the oil from the reservoir is able to push oil up to gush out of the blowout well, in terms of barrels per day.

I don't see how BP can have mud heavy enough to achieve this goal. The fact that viscosity of mud is significant higher than the viscosity of oil, hense mud flow experiences much higher resistance than the oil flow, makes it even harder.

Now that is just one condition, being able to inject mud and completely fill the blowout well with it, without being diluted by the gushing oil. It requires mud heavy enough. This condition directly contradict another condition, which is that the mud must not be so heavy that it is able to seep into the rock fractures, which requires mud that is not so heavy.

The second condition, preventing mud from seeping into the rock formation, can simply be written as:

(5) (P(Net Relief) - P(Net Reservoir)) <= 0 This second conditon, formula (5), can not be achieved at the same time that first condition, formula (4) is achieved. I predict that BP's relief wells are not going to be successful.

A MORE SERIOUS warning to BP: If the relief wells fail as I predicted, do NOT resort to the desperate act of using nuclear options. If you use nuclear option, there is a good possibility it will trigger chain reaction of methane eruption on a global scale, turning the local catastrophe into a global catastrophe!!!

Full Disclosure:
The author does not currently have any short or long position in BP, but plan to short BP if irrational exuberance pushes BP share price higher leading to the near finish of the relief wells giving people false hope it's going to be successful.

Eco Emissions - Great Innovation and Huge Demand Potential for Platinum Group Metals

2010-06-26T16:38:00.000-07:00

There are eureka moments when you slap on your thighes and ask yourself: "Why haven't I thought about THAT!" The time when I first learned about Eco Emissions is one such moment.

But let me first remind people on the on-going and ever worsening Gulf Oil Spill caused by British Petroleum (BP). Many predicts that the disaster is so bad that a BP bankruptcy is a certainty. That includes Matthew Simmons, author of Twilight in the Desert, who calls for a BP demise in a month. I have high respect for Matthew Simmons but I believe he owe an appology to the world for getting his math wrong, by orders of magnitude. I believe that the fate of BP is now a political issue with Peak Oil implication which goes far beyond the mere fate of one big company. If death of BP means the death of the deep water oil drilling industry, there may be political will to save BP after all. But I will not touch BP either way at this moment as there are too many uncertainties. I will discuss when is best time to buy BP in another article.

The real story: Fossil fuels are bad pollutants, both BEFORE and AFTER they are burned. Before the oil is burned, they could pollute the ocean and kill birds. After the oil is burned, carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide is emitted to pollute the air and destroy rain forests. But if oil is only partially burned, the pollution is way much worse: it results in emissions containing carbon monoxide, a toxic gas which is several hundred times worse than carbon dioxide in its greenhouse effect; and various nitrogen oxides which kills infants and senior citizens; and worse, particulate matters which are cancer agents which causes millions of deaths per year. The world collectively generates a thousand BP oil spill environmental disaster per year by producing and burning fossil fuels, accumulatively killed many times more people than was killed in WW II.

Incomplete burning of fuel is a big problem, it reduces fuel efficiency and creates air pollution. Scientists have worked relentlessly to solve the problem. The biggest progress of ourse is the global adaption of catalytic converters on automobiles. Using PGM metals, platinum, palladium and rhodium, as catalyst metals in catalytic converters, auto makers like FORD (F), GM (GMGMQ.PK), and TOYOTA (TM) are the largest industry users of PGM. What occurs in catalytic converters is basically after-burning: the incompletely burned fuel is once more burned more thoroughly in the catalytic converters, hence it cuts the pollutant emissions.

But catalytic converters do not solved all problems: They do not improve the fuel burning within the combustion chamber and hence do not improve fuel efficiency. More over, ocean traveling ships are currently not required to be equipped with catalytic converters, although there are pending new regulations which may finally impose such requirements on ships and also on gasoline-operated lawn machines.

This is going to change big time, thanks to a startup company called Eco Emissions Systems, founded only in 2008. The idea is simple: just directly introduce the catalyst in the combustion chambers of diesel engines! Doing so makes the fuel burn more thorough and hence improves engine efficiency. It also means less pollutants are emitted into the air. The technology is already there: platinum metal can be use to make nano-solutions containing tiny particles of the metal. The liquid can be turned into moist and injected into the diesel engine combustion chamber through the air intake. The catalyst contained in the moist then meets the fuel and promote the thorough burning, resulting in great savings of fuel cost. A simple idea worth billions of dollars.

At roughly 10% or more fuel savings, a typical dry bulk ship could save $1M per year just in fuel cost. For a shipping company like DRYS, EXM or EGLE, applying the technology on a fleet of 40 ships means a saving of $40M per year. That is a huge boost of their financial bottom line.

Too bad I did not come up with the idea early enough: Eco Emissions Systems already patented the idea globally and they stand to rip huge profit from the patent. Their stock symbol is ECMZ.PK or ECMB.OB. They are already well into business as their systems are being tested on a Holland America cruise ship, before being expanded to the whole fleet. I can see Royal Caribbean Cruises (RCL) and Carnival Corp (CCL) expressing interest soon. According to their web site, the company already has more than $132M documented product demands and that was in 2009, a mere one year after the founding of the company. I can see they grow much bigger! Who would not like the idea of saving cost?!

I would like to come up another novel idea which might be worth billions of dollars as well, but instead of patenting it I would give it out for free to big oil companies like BP, XOM and CVX: Why not simply add the platinum containing nano-solution to the diesel fuel itself, and hence achieve the same fuel efficiency improvements, without the need to retro-fit existing diesel engines to modify the air intake system? This way, their diesel fuel products will be more competitive. But then I guess the big oil may not like the idea: they want consumers to pay higher prices for oil and burn more fuels, not less. But if an idea can save consumers money, it will catch on like wild fire, regardless whether big oil like it or not.

Where is the investment opportunity here? The Eco Emissions technology, and similar technologies that put PGM catalysts directly into fuel combustion chambers can create huge demand for the PGM metals! Even though only a small amount of platinum is consumed, consider the fact that the world consumes one cubic miles of oil per year while producing no more than a cube of 8 feet worth of platinum annually, this new demand on PGM metals could mean paradigm shift in the global supply/demand picture, sending the prices skyrocketing.

How do you invest in this opportunity? Venture capitalists might want to talk to Eco Emissions Systems and get a good gauge what their growth potential is. For average investors, it's time to hoard physical platinum and palladium, and invest in two physical metal backed ETFs: PPLT and PALL. More leveraged play would be investing in stocks of platinum and palladium mining companies, like South Africa's Anglo Platinum (AGPPY.PK) and Impala Platinum (IMPUY.PK). Some one keeps refering Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK) as a palladium play. But even though I keep mentioning Norilsk Nickel as the world's largest palladium producer, they are a nickel play, not a palladium play, as palladium is only their by-product.

Of course, my most favorite PGM play remains Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL). They are closer to home in North America, and they are the world's only primary palladium producers. SWC recently published a market study, A Case For Palladium, which documents how various factors, like the termination of the decades long Russian government palladium stockpile sales, and ongoing South African electricity crisis, could create a ten year bull market in palladium.

More than 95% of my 401K retirement account is invested in SWC and PAL, mostly SWC. I keep hearing people calling me crazy on that. One day they will know it's crazy not to have a big chunk of that stock in your portfoio, knowing the huge potential in palladium. Cold Fusion which uses palladium was considered a crazy idea to begin with, but it's now getting more and more acceptance in the mainstream. Peak Oil is still considered a crazy idea by most, but it is a looming reality right now right this moment. All great investors were called crazy at certain point of their investment career. Warren Buffett was called crazy putting all his eggs in just one busket, purchasing that bankrupt textile mill no one heard about. He was crazy. But the company by the original name which is now known globally is totally out of the textile business and into quite something else. You know the rest of the history of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A and BRK-B).

Full Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in SWC and PAL and own palladium metal bullion coins. The author also owns shipping stocks mentioned: EXM and EGLE. The author currently has no position in BP or other stocks mentioned and has no connection to Eco Emissions Systems other than learning it from the news.

Debunking the Shrinking M3 Money Supply Myth

2010-05-27T05:41:00.000-07:00

Recently an article published on the UK newspaper Daily Telegraph received wide-spread global attention and debate. The article titled US money supply plunges at 1930s pace as Obama eyes fresh stimulus and claimed that M3, the broadest measure of total US dollars in circulation, is shrinking, rather expanding, at rapid pace.

The claim of a shrinking M3 can not stand the scrutiny of logic and fool even a three year old child. The US Treasury Department has been conducting bi-weekly treasury auctions of unprecedent and astronomical amounts. The treasury auctions never fail. There are always willing buyers bidding for the US treasuries at pathetically low, almost zero yields.

Regardless who those misterious US treasury buyers are and why they are buying at such low yields, any one who buys US treasury must tender US dollars to buy the treasuries. The money tendered must be US dollars in one form or another and hence must be part of the circulating M3 of US dollar.

If the total M3 is shrinking, where does the spare money come from that buys the US treasuries? Coming out of thin air? And where does the money go once they are tendered to the US treasury Department? Vanish into thin air again? A shrinking M3 makes no sense at all.

Now where does the idea of shrinking M3 come from? Read the history of M3b here. Notice that the FED stopped publishing statistics of M3 as of March, 2006. So there is no longer any official data on M3 after March, 2006. Any M3 number we see after the FED stopped publishing it, are NOT official numbers, but mere the guess work of private parties. These unofficial M3 numbers, or M3b, thus may not be accurate.

I studied how M3b is constructed ever since it was first published. I believe the person who originated the formulation to calculate M3b made a fatal mistake which renders the data useless.

That is, an important component of M3 is the so called eurodollar. Do not be mislead by the suffix "euro" in the word eurodollar. It has nothing to do with Europe or euro. Eurodollar means all US dollars outside the US territory, i.e., US dollar deposited in foreign banks or held by foreign individuals and organizations.

The official statistics of eurodollar is no longer published by FED. Without this data you can not construct the total M3. The inventor of M3b get around this problem by noting that eurodollar constitute only 3% of M3, and assumed that eurodollar is either a constant, or fluctuate only slightly with oil price.

Such assumption might be true a few years ago before the current global financial crisis. But it is absolutely wrong now. Eurodollar is no longer only a small percentage of total M3, nor is it just a constant. Trillion dollars worth of money is dashing around the world, rushing across borders in so called Hot Money, seeking safe havens and investment opportunities some where else. More over, the FED itself enacts numerous currency swap agreements with foreign central banks, exchanging huge amount of one kind of printed color paper funny money with another kind of printed color paper funny money.

How could any one still believe that the total amount of eurodollar is still small, and is still nearly constant? With all the US dollar rushing across borders?

The so called shrinking M3b tells one true story which is that huge amount of money is escaping from the US soil and going to foreign land. The M3 within the US boarder may indeed be shrinking, despite of the FED's mad printing of money, thus draining the money supply within the US boarder, causing an illusion of monetary deflation in the USA. But the money does NOT disappear. It simply gets hoarded up by foreigners and foreign central banks. Countries like China doesn't like to hoard more US dollar at all, despite of being forced to do so. China is trying all it can to block the inflow of US dollar hot money.

The total US dollar M3, globally, is NOT shrinking, but expanding rapidly. No one has an accurate account of the amount of hot money flowing around. Monetary inflation in countries like China and India are rampant. Eventually when foreigners have it enough, all those overseas US dollar will be flooded back home, causing hyperinflation in the USA.

The temporary illusion of monetary deflation in the USA is only a prelude to the looming hyperinflation to come when the eurodollars come back home. It is like rapidly receeding water right before a tsunami hits. If you are on a beach and you see suddenly receeding water, don't rush in to pick sea shells, immediately rush to the high ground for your dear life! When you actually see the water coming back, it is already too late!!!

People need to protect their financial lives by hoarding physical precious metals: gold, silver, platinum, but best of all, palladium is my favorite precious metal, before it is too late and inflation sign is already seen by every one.

China Now a Failed Seller of Its Treasuries

2010-04-09T10:28:00.000-07:00

I intentionally made this title to rhyme with the title of my last article "China Now the Biggest Seller of U.S. Treasuries". On April 9th, 2010, ZeroHedge published a new article that caught my attention: Gray Swan? Chinese Bill Auctions Fail. Basically China tried to sell a very small amount of very short period treasury bills of its own, CNY15 billion of 91-day bills and CNY20 billion of 273-day bills. But it failed to attact enough interest in the treasuries.

China wants to borrow some money and could not find a willing lender? You would expect it to happen to Uncle Sam instead, wouldn't you? A few days ago Seeking Alpha author Chris Martenson, in The FED's Shell Game Continues, was poundering exactly who is lending trillions of dollars to the US government. That's a well researched paper worth reading.

Would I be lending a couple of million dollars to my rich next door neighbor, if I need to borrow a couple thousand dollars myself? Probably not. I will lend money if I have the excessive liquidity, and I trust that the one I lend the money to will be able to pay it back. If I need to borrow money to spend, why would I have anything to lend to some one else? The same should apply to organizations and even nations.

The question people need to ask is: exactly who in the world has the capacity to lend trillions of dollars to the US government, in the form of purchasing the US treasuries? Foreign governments?

WHICH foreign government in the world runs a budget surplus, and hence has excessive money to lend to the USA?

Is it Japan? No! Japanese government runs a huge budget deficit and it is more than 700 trillion yen in debt? Is it UK? The UK government runs such a huge budget deficit and it is so deep in debts that Jim Rogers sees a collapse of the British pounds in months. Is it China? The Chinese government isn't shy in running budget deficit and print money out of thi air either. Where do you think they get the 4 trillion yuan economic stimulus money to spent, if it were not printed out of thin air?

I could NOT name a single government in the world who runs a budget surplus. Can you? No one runs a budget surplus. So why would any of these countries have any excessive money to lend to Uncle Sam?

It's the people who have the money. People who work hard and save their money to build a wealth. These people themselves would not be buying the US treasury using their money, because they know better usage of their money than lending it to some one who has no credible capability to pay it back in real term. But they trusted their governments and their banks, they gave their money to the Chinese government, and to the banks, thinking their money is in the hands of a good steward. But then the central banks turn around and betrayed their trust, and used the money to buy US treasuries.

The same story happens in the UK, in Japan, and also in the USA. All the American people who think they still have their money in the good hands. Well think again! Some where behind the back doors your money is already quietly lended out to Uncle Sam, without you knowing it. No wonder Uncle Sam would never fail to find willing lenders in each of every massive US treasury auctions. China could fail a treasury auction, but never could the US Treasury Department.

It's all a Ponzi Scheme on a global scale.

I just wonder how longer can it last before the scheme collapses.

Physical precious metals and other physical assets hold in your own name, is the only safe haven to protect your financial wealth. Equities of companies producing these safe haven assets, is how you make money from the looming crisis.

Norilsk Nickel Metals Production Projection for 2010

2010-01-31T02:31:00.000-08:00

Russia's Norilsk Nickel Mine (NILSY.PK) is the world's largest nickel mine, with its by-product palladium account for 45% of the world’s mine production.

Recent termination of Russian government palladium stockpile sale, due to depletion of the stockpile, is just one of the reasons why palladium has extremely bullish supply/demand fundamentals, and why palladium performed the best among all four precious metals in 2009.

Reduction of palladium production from Norilsk Mine could further restraint the supply, and may prompt major industry users to panic hoard like in 2000/2001.

One must correctly project Norilsk Nickel's 2010 metals production, to have an accurate picture of global platinum and palladium supply/demand outlook for 2010.

Norilsk's Russian operation has two divisions, the Polar Division, which produces platinum and palladium as by-products, and the Kola Division, which contains only nickel and copper.

The Polar Division proven reserve mineral ore contents are as following:

Ore Type	Ni (%)	Cu (%)	Pt (g/ton)	Pd (g/ton)	Cu/Ni Ratio
Rich	2.86%	3.98%	1.49	7.04	1.392
Cuprous	1.13%	4.58%	2.57	10.80	4.053
Disseminated	0.49%	0.89%	1.45	3.97	1.816

There are mainly two types of ores, as disseminated is insignificant:

Rich type, which is rich in nickel but poor in copper, platinum and palladium content.

Cuprous type, the opposite, poor in nickel, but rich in copper, platinum and palladium.

In the past I pointed out that Norilsk was switching to the rich nickel ore to cut cost and increase nickel revenue, or simply due to the geology structure of the ore body being mined.

The effect of the production switch is that for the same amount of nickel, much less copper, platinum and palladium will be produced, as I predicted.

The data in the past two years and Norilsk’s own projection for 2010 have confirmed my prediction. The ore type switch can be closely monitored by looking at the Copper/Nickel production ratio and see how it changes over time.

Here are the Norilsk Nickel Russian production (Polar + Kola Divisions) over the years, plus 2010 projections:

Year	Ni (tons)	Cu (tons)	Pt (troy oz)	±%	Pd (troy oz)	±%	Cu/Ni
2005	243,000	427,000	751,000		3,133,000		1.757
2006	244,000	425,000	752,000	+0.13%	3,164,000	+0.99%	1.742
2007	234,454	404,465	727,000	-3.32%	3,049,000	-3.63%	1.725
2008	232,302	400,338	632,000	-13.1%	2,702,000	-11.4%	1,723
2009	232,813	382,443	636,000	+0.63%	2,676,000	-0.96%	1.643
2010*	234,000	363,000	655,000	+2.99%	2,715,000	+1.46%	1.551

(* Based on Norilsk Nickel projection for 2010)

We are interested in palladium, so we want to see only the productions of the Polar Division. After subtracting the Kola Division, here are the numbers for the Polar Division:

Year	Ni (tons)	Cu (tons)	Pt (troy oz)	±%	Pd (troy oz)	±%	Cu/Ni
2005	123,000	361,000	751,000		3,133,000		2.935
2006	122,000	351,000	752,000	+0.13%	3,164,000	+0.99%	2.877
2007	119,000	338,000	727,000	-3.32%	3,049,000	-3.63%	2.840
2008	122,000	339,000	632,000	-13.1%	2,702,000	-11.4%	2.779
2009	122,813	321,443	636,000	+0.63%	2,676,000	-0.96%	2.617
2010*	124,000	302,000	655,000	+2.99%	2,715,000	+1.46%	2.435

(* Based on Norilsk Nickel projection for 2010)

As shown in the chart, nickel production is maintained pretty flat over the years. However the copper/nickel ratio consistently dropped. The drop of the Cu/Ni ratio accelerated since 2008 and continues to go significantly down in 2010 projections.

As a result, I predict Norilsk’s palladium production in 2010 will not raise slightly as projected by Norilsk Nickel itself, but rather should continue to drop significantly from 2009 level, commensurate with the drop of copper/nickel production ratio.

I am predicting a palladium production level at 2.55M ounces for 2010, and platinum at 600K ounces level.

Is it ridiculous that people should believe my prediction, rather than Norilsk’s own prediction? From early 2008 on, based on my observation of the ore type switch, I insisted on my prediction of Norilsk palladium production at 2.7M level for 2008.

But Norilsk re-iterated, in its Q1 production release, that it’s on target to reach 2008 palladium production level at 3.02M to 3.07M ounces. In the Q2, 2008 report they still insisted that previous full year projections were unchanged. In Q3 they did not revise annual guidance either. When the final result of 2008 came out to be 2.7M ounces, I was right, Norilsk Nickel was wrong. Why would they insist on a wrong and overly optimistic guidance, is beyond me.

The bullish case of the global palladium market now looks even better.

Investors in the world’s only primary palladium producers, Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL), will stands to profit from the expected palladium price surge in 2010.

After falling for a continuous 8 days for a healthy correction from recent high, it’s now time to buy back these two stocks, SWC and PAL.

Data sources:
Norilsk Nickel Company Web Page
Norilsk Nickel Production Result Releases
Norilsk Nickel 2009 Production and Projection for 2010
Norilsk Nickel Mineral Reserves and Resources Statement
Norilsk Nickel Mining Operations

Full Disclosure: The author hoards physical precious metal palladium, and hold large positions in SWC and PAL. 95% of my 401K account is in SWC and PAL.

Unwinding of Currency Swap = Looming US Dollar Crisis!

2010-01-28T22:24:00.000-08:00

The Daily Gold blogger Harvey Organ reports that ECB and other Central Banks are terminating the currency swap with the US Federal Reserve Bank as of Feb. 1, 2010. How they are going to unwind the currency swap is something very interesting to watch. It could finally trigger the long expected US dollar crisis: Collapse of the US treasury market and the US dollar itself.

In a currency swap, two central banks print their own currency out of thin air and swap them in a zero interest loan according to the exchange rate. Then after a period of time, they return the loaned currency to each other. For example the FED will loan US dollars to Bank of England (BOE) while BOE loans British Pounds to the FED. Upon the end of currency swap agreement, they unwind the trade by the BOE returning the US dollar, and the FED returning the British Pounds.

The question is how they are going to be able to unwind? The total swap is believed to be as high as US$500B. Some say as high as US$2T. If the central banks merely locked up the cash in a vault, they could easily return the money. But that would defeat the whole purpose of currency swap. Instead of being locked up in a vault, the swapped currency must have been SPENT in some way. Then the question is how do they get the money back if it is already spent, sold out or otherwise given away?

For example I long suspected where did the British get the money to buy US treasuries over recent times? According to latest official data, UK's holdings of US treasuries was up $145.1B in 12 months, while China's holdings went up only $76.4B.

Where did the UK get the money to buy US treasuries? Unlike China which earns US dollar from its trade surplus against the USA, The UK has a huge trade deficit against the USA. It spend US$2 buying US goods for each US$1 it earns selling products to the USA. Where did they get the US dollars to purchase US treasuries? If it was not from trade balance, it must be from the give out by the FED, in the name of currency swap. It cost UK nothing to print British pounds and then exchange for the dollar, just like it costs the FED nothing to print the dollars.

In a sense, FED is secretly buying our own debts through foreign hands, via the currency swap agreements!!!! Now, how is the currency swap going to be unwinded? What magic are they going to pull this time, asn the BOE has already SPEND out the US dollar in buying US treasuries. It does NOT have the money to return to the FED.

Likewise, probably the FED does not have the money to return to BOE either. They must have spent out the British Pounds as well as other foreign currencies, in repeated attempts to sell foreign currency and buy US dollars, to support the dollar, in recent times.

It's going to be fun to watch how the unwinding can be done. If my speculation is right, BOE must sell its holding of US treasuries to raise US dollar to unwind the loan, and the FED must also need to sell dollar and buy British Pounds to unwind its loan as well. Both would be fatal blow to the value of US treasury and US dollar.

Time to run to precious metals as your financial safe haven. Don't run to euro, as the eurozone is crumbling down. Don't run to Japanese yen. Japan has an even worse debt problem. When Japan collases under its debt it must sell US treasuries to salvage its own currency, which will trigger a domino effect leading to the fall of the dollar. The only thing safe are precious metals and commodities.

But unlike most other precious metal bugs I will not tell you to run to gold, or silver. Every one talks about gold as if it is the only safe haven. When every one talks about one thing, be careful. The world is not in shortage of gold. The world has plenty of gold that could easily lasts a couple thousand years if we do not produce gold any more. Warren Buffet famously critized gold by saying that you dig out the metal from the ground, and then dig another hole to hold up, and have to pay armed guards to watch it, what for?

I am also questioning the wisdom of silver investment. Silver bugs have been calling for silver shortage for years. But I never see any solid data to back up the claim of shortage. If there is no shortage, if a precious metal's price is only supported by investment demand, then there is a problem because anything that is purely supported by investment demand, is by definition a bubble, the investment demand could easily turn into investment supply in an instance.

The only good precious metal investment, must be one which is based on REAL industrial shortage, not by the hypothetical investment demand. If there is an industrial shortage, the price MUST go up regardless what investors believe. And price movement due to real shortage, on the other hand, can create solid and reliable investment demand. Such precious metals will provide the best performance way much better than gold.

The only two precious metals I see solid data to support a supply shortage case, are platinum and palladium. Of course my favorite is PALLADIUM. My most favorite mining stocks are Stllwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL), the only primary palladium producers. Russia's Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK) is world's largest palladium but they are mainly a nickel producer. South Africa's Anglo Platinum (AGPPY.PK) and Impala Platinum (IMPUY.PK) produces by-product palladium. Watching Platinum Today on related PGM metals news, and KITCO for price movements.

The parabolic price rally of palladium in the past one year, a performance that is far better than gold, silver and platinum, has vindicated my conviction on a palladium bull case.

Why palladium? FOUR things make palladium extremely bullish:

1. Termination of Russian government palladium stockpile sale, due to stockpile depletion.

2. Looming South African electricity crisis could strike again any time, just like two years ago.

3. Launch of ETF Securities physical palladium fund (PALL) in the US market.

4. Long term potential of palladium used in Cold Fusion, make it a must have strategic metal.

I have discussed these points in many of my past articles which I will not repeat. I merely needs to point out that Impala Platinum's PGM Supply Demand data confirms dramatic reduction in Russian palladium supply, as the stockpile sale has ended. There is now a big strictural deficit. Read more detailed discussions on GIM forums.

I do not have to cover the recent launch of ETFS platinum and palladium funds, either.You can see the powerful price surge of palladium recently, and read what fellow SA contributors have to say:

Why Gold ETFs Should Be Afraid of Platinum Cousins
Platinum and Palladium ETFs: Dare They Outshine Gold?
Platinum, Palladium ETFs Are a Home Run
Pent-Up Demand Is Behind Platinum Fund's Success
New ETFs Off to Roaring Start
Don’t Blame Platinum, Palladium ETFs

Sadly, even though people have caught attention to platinum and palladium. There has been absolutely NO mentioning of the end of the Russian palladium stockpile sale, and how palladium rallied from $300 to $1100 in 2000 merely because of a FALSE rumor related to the stockpile sale. Nobody mentioned the South African electricity crisis either, even it triggered quite a rally in PGM prices in early 2008, and another South African electricity crisis is looming again in the near future. Please read the background discussions.

And yet most people don't even know about platinum and palladium. All they know is gold gold gold, silver silver silver.

Let them have gold. I want to have palladium. And I can not own enough stocks of SWC and PAL. I have been predicting and advocating for a super bullish palladium rally for almost two years. No one paid attention until it really happens.

But this is just the start! The real fun will begin when auto makers realize what's going on in Russia and South Africa, and start to panic hoard. If it were not for the foolishness of major industrial user like TOYOTA(TM), GM and FORD (F), rhodium would never see gigantic price swings from $300 to $11000. Shouldn't industrial users acquire and keep a plentifully large stockpile when rhodium was at $300, so they do not need to pay $11000 an ounce a few years later? They never learn.

Full Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in palladium mining stocks SWC and PAL, and own PALL. The author owns silver mining stocks like CDE, SSRI, PAAS but have no interest in ETF funds GLD and SLV, as I do not trust their gold and silver holdings.

Hot Money, Hot Commodities and the US Dollar Carry Trade Part 3

2009-12-05T13:35:00.000-08:00

In part one of the article, I argued why the collapse of the US dollar is inevitable and commodities are the only safe haven in the event of currency collapse; In part two of the article I begin to demystify some mis-conceptions about commodities investment. Some times even Jim Rogers could be wrong. I specifically cited the example of the UNG natural gas fund.

In this part three, I will elaborate more on what are the correct approaches for commodities investment, and what is the best commodity to invest in. I am going to discuss the things that Jim Rogers was wrong about.

I can not emphasize this enough: When you invest in something, you should always ask the question WHO PAYS FOR YOUR PROFIT. You can't create money out of thin air. Some one has to pay you for you to make a profit. If you can not figure out who pays for your profit, then your investment thesis has a problem.

In the market, the majority of people must be the losers so as to allow a few people in the minority to make obscene amount of profits. That's how the world works. Always think for yourself, do not let other people do your thinking for you. I have high respect for Jim Cramer who I think is a smart guy. Unfortunately too big a crowd gathered around him, so that the biggest crowd must necessarily be the biggest crowd of fools and losers, by definition. That's not Jim Cramer's fault, but his success, as an entertainer.

Warren Buffet is the buy-and-hold-forever type of investor. Who pays Warren Buffet if he nevr sells? The companies he own keep operating profitable businesses to genenate fortune for him.

Who pays the day traders who buy and sell equities in short periods? It's got to be fellow day traders. So day trading is nothing but gambling, a zero sum game with 50/50 winning and losing odds. In recorded history no one becomes a billionaire through day trading.

Who pays you when you invest in something for long term? The rest of the investor community, Mr. market pays you. All long term profitable investments requres two things:

You need to have the wisdom to recognize the long term value of your investment.
The rest of the world must disagree with you, so you can buy your investment cheap.

I must particularly emphasize the second point. For your investment thesis to be correct, people must disagree with you. They will ridicule you, curse you, calling you all sorts of names. If people laughed at you, don't be discouraged and don't get angry. Instead take their laugh as a compliment and take comfort in the fact that most people disagree with you, so you are in the minority, so you are probably right.

But you still need to make sure you are right in the first place. This requires hard work doing your due diligence research. This also requires that there need to be some people, who, after spending time doing their own due diligence, no longer laugh at you and start to agree with you. That is important. If every one in the world laughs at you, then you are an idiot. If 99% of people laugh at you but 1% do take you seriously, then it says you are a genius and the world is a fool.

All the successful investors receive more than enough of their fair share of being laughed at, in the early stages of their investment careers, including Warren Buffet and Jim Rogers. But no one laughs at Warren Buffet any more. Every one takes him seriously now. That's his problem. Anything he wants to buy, it leaks out before he could buy enough so he ended up paying more. Any time he wants to sell, people beat him before he could sell much. When you have a big crowd around you, it makes a billionaire very hard to make his next move.

Jim Rogers also have a big fan group, so even though he deserves high respect from me, I will take him with a few grains of salt. His pitch on agriculture commodities, his best favor, for example, I think is flawed. Let me discuss why. hope some one can pass this note to Jim Rogers himself, so he knows why he is wrong, or argues with me why he is still right.

Jim noted that every one needs to eat, and there is limited land resource to produce all the food people need to eat. That is a fact. But that is a fact known by every one already, and it is a true fact for millions of years already. The best invest ideas always come from facts that are recent news, and that few people know, not from something every one already know for a long time. So this immediately rings an alarming bell on Jim's agriculture commodity thesis.

Jim failed to notice that the threshold for demand destruction is low for food, and hence it caps the value appreciation potential of food. Poor peoplein poor countries already dedicate 75% to 90% of their disposable income on food. How are they going to pay more? There is not much room to go from spending 90% of income to spending 100%. People will just have to eat less and eat what their income can afford them. So this reduces demand and caps the price appreciation. In fiat currency term, the price can still go up a lot. But in purchase power term, there is virtually no room for growth.

Consider that no one can spend more than 100% of disposable income, and that food expenses are already the biggest percentage of people's spending, I would say that in terms of purchase power, agriculture products are probably the WORST of commodity investments, not the best.

Applying the same thinking, I think Jim's another pitch is a great one: Water. Water is more important than food to sustain human lifes. How much an average family spends on water, in terms of percentage of disposable income? I am paying roughly $1.50 for one unit, about 97 gallons. That's only 1.5 cents a gallon. So there is a lot of appreciation potential. If there is water shortage, when water bills hit 25% of a family's spendings, people will start to use less while each gallon will become more expensive. Pushing the theoretical limit, you can probably survive reasonably well on just two gallons of water per day and the water will costs a family of four about $1000 per month. That's roughly $4 per gallon water. So that's a lot of appreciation potential going from 1.5 cents to $4 per gallon of water. That price target is actually realistic, as people in some Arab country are already paying more per gallon for water, than for gasoline!!!

Water is just an example to stimulate thinking. Investing in water is tough. How do you store water at low cost for long time without spoil it, besides there is no shortage of water on earth. There is only a shortage of water purification treatments and transportation. Maybe investing $1000 or so for a secured drinking water supply, is a wise investment for your family.

I consider precious metals as commodities in a broad sense. Many gold bugs consider gold as a sacret cow, different from other commodities. I disagree. Gold or any precious metal is simply a metal that is precious. Nothing more and nothing less. Sacret cow only exists in religions.

What's the best commodity to invest in? As I discussed in my last article, the only sensible to invest in a commodity is to either hoard the physical stuff, or invest in the companies that produce the stuff. So an ideal commodity to invest in should be easy to store, and has the largest price appreciation potential:

It should be compact and easy to store, and remain safe and stable for long term. This immediately rules out any thing gaseous or liquid, because they are hard to store.

It should be price inelastic on the demand side. That means price can be driven up to very high level, and the industry consumers can still afford it. This immediately rules out food products and base metals that are used in bulk quantities, like steel, copper and aluminum.

It should also be price inelastic on the supply side, that means it should probably be a by-product. Most producers will not bother to increase the production of their main product just to produce more by-product and marginally increase their by-product profits.

Once you apply these rules, there are not many commodities that can qualify as the best commodities investment. Three metals meet all the requirements: Palladium, silver and tellurium. No. 46, 47 and 52 on the periodic table.

Silver is almost as widely known as gold, and more widely used as money than gold, throughout human history. People in China and other Asian countries love silver better than gold. Recent news from China indicate that silver investment is red hot, while the gold market is flat. Jim Rogers himself encourages the Chinese to buy silver and palladium, rather than gold.

Over 70% of global silver supply is produced as a base metal by-product, only 30% is produced from primary silver mines. So silver can be classified as a by-product metal. On the demand side, silver is price inelastic. Silver is widely used in the electronics industry, but so little silver is used in individual components, that the cost is never a concern. On the jewelry side, material cost ofsilver is a very small percentage of total cost of most silver jewelries, so at current price level, silver jewelries are price inelastic as well.

I like silver as a storage of wealth. But I like palladium much better, as an investment. For decades, there is a large structural deficit in global palladium supply. The global palladium deficit was only filled in by the annual Russian Government paladium stockpile sale, which is about 1 to 2 million ounces a year. Global mine production is about 6.5 million ounces per year while consumption well exceed 8 million ounces per year. Read Platinum 2009 Interim Review to get an idea of platinum/palladium supply/demand numbers.

Russia has the world's largest nickel mine, Norilsk Nickel (Nilsy.PK), which is also the world's largest palladium producer, since they produce palladium as a by-product. The Russian government accumulated the excess palladium production during the Soviet Era in their strategic metals stockpile. You must read the 2003 report by Alan Williamson to understand the Russian palladium stockpile and how its size could be estimated. A false rumor regarding the Russian palladium stockpile trigger the palladium price spike of 2000/2001.

Many metals analysts have been speculating that this Russian palladium stockpile is near depletion. If that is the case, it will be a paradigm shift event which could send the metal price sky high, far exceeding the 2000/2001 price peak of palladium price.

Two recent news items confirms that the Russian palladium stockpile has indeed depleted. One is on August 31, 09, another is on October 15, 09. So far, this news has not caused much attention and has not resulted in explosive palladium rally yet. My favorite palladium mines, SWC and PAL, have moved up in share price. But they are still far from the heights where I expect to see them to reach.

But looking at the performance of palladium price in the past year, how could any one still complain? As fellow SA contributor John Lounsbury also noticed, Palladium already did far better than platinum, silver and gold in the past 12 months. I just wish more people learn the story of the depleting Russian palladium stockpile.

Many years ago, Warren Buffett correctly pointed out that Mr. Market is a fool. My own experience tells me that I could never underestimate the foolishness of Mr. Market, or the stupidness of the world. You only need to look at the global warming hysteric fiasco.

The foolishness of the general investor community can be best reflected in the tellurium story. Two years ago I advocated for hoarding physical tellurium and predicted that the business of First Solar (FSLR) is not going any where, as they could be suffocated by a global tellurium shortage brought about due to the emerging new applications of tellurium based electronic devices, like phase-change memory. How many people listened and believed me? More people in the world understand Einstein's Relativity Theory, then people who understand tellurium supply and demand! Now Numonrx was able to make multi-layer phase-change-memory chips. This is a paradigm shift in the electronics industry. As advanced as the modern microelectronics industry is, they were never able to produce a multi-layer computer chip. It's going to be huge for tellurium and a gigantic jackpot for the tellurium investors.

But for now, people still fight hand over fist to buy FSLR stocks, believing that First Solar can grow its business unlimited. Some investors actually believed that tellurium can be extracted from sewages, because I told them most tellurium is extracted from the slime mud produced during copper electrolysis production. Yeah right! Just don't do it at home and don't dig out the sewage pipe in your toilet. I assure you there is no tellurium to be found.

Full Disclosure: The author hoards physical tellurium, physical palladium, and has large long positions in SWC and PAL, as well as silver mining stocks SSRI, PAAS and CDE. The author no longer holds position in UNG and has no short or long position in FSLR. The author holds other positions unrelated to the discussion in this article.

Hot Money, Hot Commodities and the US Dollar Carry Trade Part 2

2009-10-28T19:54:00.000-07:00

In the last part of the article I discussed the reason why the collapse of the US dollar is all but inevitable, but the US economy itself will be strong enough to survive. Let me say it again, collapse of the US dollar does not equal to collapse of the US economy. If the dollar becomes worthless, Microsoft (MSFT) or Intel can sell their hardware or software products for gold or coins. They can still manage to make a profit, because the world still want their products.

How do investors protect themselves during a currency collapse?

First, the majority of investors and the majority of average American people will be wiped out financially. That is a FACT of mathematical statistics when a country's currency collapses. Majority of people will be wiped out, but a selective few in the minority will be able to rip huge profit from the crisis. If you want to protect yourself, you can not be with the majority. You must be with the minority group of people. Do NOT let other people do the thinking for you.

So are you listening to the most popular economic analyst or the most popular financial TV host? If you do, you are in danger because you are together with the biggest group of fools! You find safety when you are forced to jump from a big boat to a small boat, not the other way around. Just ask Titanic survivors how they survived. They jumped onto very small boats instead of wait for something bigger than Titanic to come to their resque. Safe havens must necessarily be small and can not accomodate too many people.

Commodities are the only safe haven. As Jim Rogers said, commodities are the only asset class with fundamentals impaired, but improved. But there are lots of myths in the commodity investments. Even Jim Rogers himself had also spreaded some incorrect myths regarding commodities investment. Most people do not know how to invest in commodities because they have not even once laid their fingers on any physical commodity. The only thing they have ever touches is a computer keyboard and mouse. A computer and a brokage account is all you need to invest in commodities, right? Wrong!

The door for commodities investment is extremely narrow. Let me tell you a small story. I am a big fan of tellurium investment and hoard actual physical tellurium. The price low of tellurium a few years ago was about $10 per pound, recent high was about $140 per pound. I predicted tellurium price could go to multiples of gold price once phase change memory goes into wide application. Almost every one laughed at me. Some, a few, did take me up seriously but they ask me NOT where to buy the physical tellurium, but rather, where to buy paper future contracts of tellurium, or what mining stock they can buy. When they hear that these two investment instruments do not exist for palladium, they left with disappointment. Most market traders do not know what to do with physical asset. They would rather prefer the convenience of pushing a computer button to instantly buy and sell something. Till this day, I think there are far fewer tellurium investors than people who understand Einstein's Relativity.

I believe that pure computer trading is the wrong way to invest in commodities. To invest in commodities you HAVE to get your hands dirty and lay your hands on the physical things. Let me explain using the example of the United States Natural Gas (UNG) fund.

Recent dismay performance of UNG gave me pause to think about how to invest in commodities. Natural gas spot price recovered from the low of about $1.84 to now nearly $5, almost a triple, but the share price of UNG still struggles around $10. Why is UNG not tracking the price of the natural gas itself? The simple answer is it's killed by contango. But there is a deeper reason.

UNG does not hold the physical natural gas. Instead they hold futures contracts. In theory, when natural gas price goes up, the asset value of these futures contract also go up. But in reality such methodology is flawed. You are holding future contracts that you never intend to take delivery. So near the expiration of the future contracts, you are forced to sell them, at any low price. Mean while you must buy the next month's future contracts, at whatever high price they are offered. As a result, in each round of the roll-over, UNG loses positions and loses money.

More over, the more investors are interested in UNG, the worse a situation UNG finds itself in. (Remember, the bigger crowd is always the loser!!!) During each roll-over, UNG could be purchasing more future contracts than producers have products available to write those contracts, hence it bids up price on the buying end. Then it turn around to sell the future contracts to industry consumers, it has more to sell than the industry consumers can buy, hence it pushes the price down on the selling end. How could you not lose money? It's like two mechants compete with each other. They bid the price up purchasing produces from the same farm, and then cut each other's throat to sell to customers at super low prices. Both lose.

Since UNG purchases future contracts that it never intend to take delivery, conceiveably on the other end of trade could be some one who write future contracts that he never intended to deliver, as he does not have the product to deliver. As no delivery is ever demanded, such paper future contracts can be created out of thing air in unlimited quantity to "meet" investment demand. Basically one side provides empty promises of supply, the other side provides false demand that never materializes. This is nothing but a zero sum game. One party's loss is exactly the other party's gain.

Therefore it is flawed to believe that trading future contracts is investing in cmmodities. It is NOT. Future contracts are derivatives with which the two sides gamble against each other. The commodity may be bullish, but you have a 50/50 chance to beat your counter party to win.

If you are interested in commodity investment, do NOT buy paper derivatives, whose supply is unlimited. Buy the physical thing, which is limited, and take delivery.

Now from a fundamental point of view, every investor needs to ask: If I invest in something and I gain, WHO pays for my profit? You are not the FED so you can't create money out of thin air. If you make a profit, then some one or something must be paying you that profit. If you buy a stock and make money, it's because the business of the company generates revenue and income, or because another investor pays you more than your original cost. I invested in physical tellurium because I know some years down the line, First Solar (FSLR) or Intel (INTC) will pay me gold price to buy my tellurium hoard.

But who pays for your profit when you invest in a commodity? Do your fellow investors pay you? If so it sounds like a Ponzi scheme. It has to be industry users of the commodity that pays you the profit. The only way for you to get paid by industry users, is for you to participate in the supply and demand of the commodity, for you to become a physical demand and then a physical supply. That means the only sensible way of investing in commodities, is for you to take physical delivery, hold for long term, until the price is higher, then you sell to the industry users.

Once again, The door for commodities investment is extremely narrow. Most of supply and demand have been directly negotiated between industry suppliers and industry users, leaving you no opportunity to participate in the market. Natural gas is a good example. The opportunity to store natural gas is virtually non-existant for outsider investors. Any gain or loss is likely directly settles between industry suppliers and users, and that leaves investors out of the natural gas business and unable to rip profit from the price appreciation.

So if you think investing in commodities is as easy as pushing a computer button, and you do not have to deal with the huzzle of buying/selling, transporting and storing the actual physical stuff. Please pause and think again. WHO PAYS YOUR PROFIT if you are not taking all the huzzles?

For this reason I am inheritly suspicious about all sorts of commodity ETFs, like GLD and SLV. Particularly SLV. Read my previous Instablog regarding some red flags in the SLV fund. What troubles me is that these nice folks help you to take care of all the sweating and laboring to handle the physical stuff, and allow you comfortably making profit sitting in front of a computer. It just sounds too good to be true.

(to be continued...)

Full Disclosure: The author is long precious metal palladium and silver, hold big positions in palladium mines SWC and PAL, as well as SSRI and CDE. I hold shipping stocks like EXM, EGLE, TBSI, DRYS, and small positions in natural gas fund UNG. I short the US dollar by holding some long positions in margin brokage account.

Hot Money, Hot Commodities and the US Dollar Carry Trade Part 1

2009-10-26T00:20:00.000-07:00

The collapse of the US dollar has passed the point of no return. An abrupt US currency collapse is now very possible. I hope we can see a gradual and orderly decline of the US dollar. But this best case scenario, as Peter Schiff hoped for, is now not likely. Peter Schiff still believes that there is still something that the FED or the US Government can do, to save the dollar. I disagree with him. Peter Schiff obviously does not understand how free market economy works, nor does Ron Paul, nor does Roubini. Jim Rogers is one of the few who understands and how free market capitalism works, and practices it by moving his family and assets to Asia. (President Obama: You still have two jobs to do: Buy the first lady an Iridium ring; and bring Jim Rogers home using Air Force One. That's all you need to have a strong family, a strong presidency and a strong nation. No kidding!)

This brings to me the Hot Money problem that China and other countries face. China has a gigantic foreign currency reserve that is composed mostly of US dollar assets, amid a looming prospect of ever falling dollar; China doesn't want to accumulate more dollars. But hot money keeps flowing in from the outside, smuggled in through Hong Kong, forcing China to print more RMB yuans to absorb the inflow of US dollars. China is not alone. Brazil recently slapped a 2% tax on foreign capital entering the nation's stock and exchange market. Australia is worried, too. Read how China's Commodity Carry Trade strategy of divesting the dollar: part 1 and part 2.

The Hot Money "problem" that China and the world worry about is actually free market principles working at their best. Basic Darwinism dictates that market capital will always go where it wants to go, not where the governments want it to go. Capital wants to get away from the soil that suffocates its growth, and move to fertile lands where it can thrive. Hot money flows out of the developed nations and into developing nations and nations with rich natural resources, because that's where opportunities of grow are.

Government interventions to stop the free flow of money are futile, fruitless and counter-productive; Government interventions to manipulate currencies and commodity prices are equally futile, fruitless, and counter-productive. Free market capitalism always works.

Recently Julian Robert thinks that the US faces Armageddon if the Chinese or Japanese stop buying the US debts, and that both countries maybe forced to sell US debts, due to domestic needs. He was right, except for the Norwegian part. The journalist asked: All the rich Norwegians have moved their money out of the country, so why do you invest there?

Good question! Capital money has its own mind. It wants to escape from hostile environments, and move to lands where it can grow and prosper. Rich Norwegians move their money out of the country because they are taxed to death. There are places where the taxation is less and the opportunity to grow is bigger. Again, government interventions are futile. China's effort to crack down on hot money inflow hardly made a dent. Equally futile was US government's tax cracking down on rich Americans who have foreign bank accounts. Such crack down is futile. If Americans want to move their money out of the country, there are plenty of ways to do it. Voting with feet is a more powerful than vote with a paper ballot. But if that's not enough, one could cast the ultimate vote with the US passport as the ballot ticket, at an overseas US consulate.

Instead of the futile crack down, the US government needs to exam itself in retrospect and ask why Americans are moving money to foreign soil, and what it can do to attract foreign money to come back to US soil. This is the key: When the money is leaving the US soil for foreign land, so are the job opportunities, so are our best investors, our best innovators and our best technical professionals, and so are our nation's future. So what do we have left? A dying US dollar and millions of jobless and hopeless hungry and angry people either sit at home waiting for the government to feed them, or else take to the street.

Peter Schiff believes that to save the dollar, all we need is the FED dramatically hike up the rate, stop money printing, and the US government massively cut spending and raise tax. The basic ideas are right. But if he believes those are realistic or possible, he really doesn't understand how free market works. What works is not what a government does, but rather what a government does NOT do. In China's history, every dynasty that prospered was only because the emperor taxed little and asserted little control of the society.

Great Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu said that governing a great nation is like cooking a small delicacy: You cook just enough so all the original flavors are preserved. If you over-cook then what comes out is anything but a delicacy. Sure America is a melting pot. But President Obama is cooking this melting pot way too hard that not only there is lots of capital spill over, but the melting pot itself is melting!!! Just ask the first lady how to cook!

Peter Schiff believes the FED can still dramatically hike up the rate and stop money printing, and the government can dramatically cut spending and hike tax, in order to save the US dollar. If it was that easy, if a government has the power to salvage its own currency, then why didn't Zimbabwe's President Mugabe do it? Did he not raise interest rate of Z$ dramatically? He has the money printer so he can afford to pay any high interest, right? Higher interest is meaningless if the principal itself, the value of one dollar drops even faster. The FED stops printing money? Who is going to buy our mountains of new issue US treasury bonds, if the FED doesn't print money out of thin air to buy our own debt?

How about the US government dramatically cut spending and hike up tax rate? You can't collect more tax from business that are not profitable, and hence has no tax to pay. Higher tax will force the profitable businesses to move to overseas, reducing, instead of increasing tax revenue. Cut spending? Which part do we cut? I think we should first cut the all the bailouts to the big banks and let them fail? But then do we want a nationwide bank runs and bank failures, and watch FDIC to go bankrupt? How about cut welfare and cut unemployment benefits. Then all the desperate people deprived of livelihoods probably will siege the White House, bringing their empty pots alone, banging and singing, until the resident has to get away on a helicopter.

Let's face reality, Mr. Peter Schiff. When you see the melting pot itself is melting and there's lots of boiling spill over, you are going to tell people that we can still have a great dinner if we do the right thing? NO! You should honestly tell the people that there is no more delicacy for dinner. The people HAVE to go to sleep with an empty stomach. What we can still do, is not to try save the delicacy, but to save the pot, so we can still cook a good meal tomorrow. Of course, Peter, you can not win votes by telling people they will be hungry. But that's the reality.

There is no salvation of the US dollar. But the US economy itself can survive and prosper. There are certain elements of the US economy, no, not the banks, not the Wall Street, but the real productive sections of the US economy, that will survive and prosper. American farmers will continue to produce food that the world needs. Intel (INTC), AMD and Microsoft (MSFT) will continue to produce computer hardware and software that the world needs. Catepillar (CAT) will continue to produce great construction machineries that China and the rest of the world wants. My most favorite mining company, Montana's Stillwater Mining Company (SWC), one of the world's only two primary palladium producers, will continue to produce palladium because the rest of the world still needs palladium, even though the bankrupt GM doesn't want to buy from SWC. Not to mention we have so many of America's world class science and technology products that the world needs from us. Not to mention our best treasure, the US constitution, one of the most beautiful constitution and the envy of the world's poor, tired, suppressed and desperate people.

Yes, the US dollar, a fiat currency, will collapse; No, the US economy itself will not collapse. A good historical precedence is hyperinflation Weimar Germany did not destroy Germany: It still had enough economic and military power to allow Hitler to launch World War Two.

Yes, the US Federal government is bankrupt, as is the FED; But No, the American nation, as well as individual states, will not go bankrupt. California will not go bankrupt. It has a constitution mandated balanced budget until recent years, and it is trying very hard to return to balanced budget, amid the difficult environment of tax revenue short fall and spending needs. It's heart breaking to see people start to talk about the possibility of session of individual states from the nation. But unless the federal government realize its own limit, and live within its limit, I think as we raise to the USSA we could well become the next USSR one day. The US government itself needs a bailout, not just the dollar.

I will discuss in the next part of this article how individual investors can protect themselves and make profit from the downfall of the dollar. Specifically I will talk about equities, commodities and US dollar carry trades, as well as how to use leverage to increase your gain.

Full Disclosure: The author is long precious metal palladium and silver, hold big positions in palladium mines SWC and PAL, as well as SSRI and CDE. I hold shipping stocks like EXM, EGLE, TBSI, DRYS, and natural gas fund UNG. I short the US dollar by holding some long positions in margin brokage account.

The Inflation/Deflation Debate and China's Commodity Carry Trade

2009-07-12T11:20:00.000-07:00

The inflation vs. deflation debate is heated up again. The debate looks far from being settled, even among professional investors. The average Joes are probably more clueless. This may be the single most important debate in the investment world.

Jim Rogers, Peter Schiff, James Sinclair, Gerald Celente, Marc Faber and Congressman Ron Paul are on the inflation camp. The argument is simple: As the US government racks up trillion dollars of deficit spending, the money can come from neither raising tax, nor borrowing. So the only way out is print money out of thin air. In history, any time a government chooses to solve its fiscal problem through massive money printing, it always leads to hyper-inflation at the end. So that is going to happen. It might be postponed a bit but can not be avoided.

But I will not immediately dismiss the arguments from the deflation camp, either. Well known people on the deflation camp includes Mike Shedlock (MISH), Nouriel Roubini, and market ticker Karl Denninger. They present three strong arguments for deflation:

Credits are destroyed in the ongoing de-leveraging process. Credits are circulated as money so the destruction of credit means less liquidity in the system.

Although the government is massively printing money, most of the newly printed money is just hoarded away in the vaults of banks and do not enter circulation.

Where is the inflation today? It's no where to be found!

Debunking the second argument is simple. Banks keep a high reserve because they are highly leveraged and they fear a bank run. If banks hoard cash instead of extend consumer credits, people will have to withdraw cash so they have the money to spend. Such a bank de-leveraging process could escalade into a bank run, resulting in the destruction of the banks and massive release of cash into the general circulation.

De-leveraging of the financial derivatives bubble does not cause deflation. Look at the history of Dutch Tulip Mania and the subsequent collapse. Did it lead to price inflation and deflation of things unrelated to tulips? Of course it didn't. The Dutch grocery stores never took a flower as a payment for milk and bread. Can I use a credit default swap to pay for milk and bread today? I can't. Inflation is a currency phenomenon. It has nothing to do with leverage.

De-leveraging is the process that people abandon paper assets due to counter party risks, and turn towards physical assets with no such risk. Physical assets have intrinsic values: the marginal costs to replace them and maintain an adequate supply. So in the de-leveraging process, paper assets will lose value, and physical assets will gain value. The US dollar is a paper asset. The dollar is leveraged on the full faith and credit of the US government on its ability to pay off its huge amount of debts, which frankly does not look good at all.

The world knows the US dollar is going down. Chinese students laughed loudly when Tim Geithner told them China's US dollar assets are "very safe". Many very rich and successful Americans know the dollar is going down. People like Jim Rogers are moving their assets out of the US dollars and into China and other places. No wonder the US government is cracking down on Swiss Accounts owned by Americans.

So here is your answer where is the inflation. Blame it on guys like Jim Rogers are selling their US assets! Jim Rogers is a billionaire. He sold his house in New York, therefore New York real estate collapsed. He sold his furniture, sofas and tables and chairs, so that brings the furniture prices down. He sold his US stocks so the US equity market is down. He sold his stuff for US dollars, and bring his dollars away from the US soil, and into China. Jim Rogers drains liquidity from the US market, thus prices of everything drop :-) Speaking seriously: This is an ongoing BANKRUPTCY LIQUIDATION SALE, not a deflation. The low prices will not last.

I told you that is exactly what happened, in my last article. Liquidity is drained from the US market because smart capitals are escaping from US soil to look for opportunities in places like China. This is a huge liquidity drain from the US. But it also causes headache for the Chinese. They need to deal with all the "hot money", the US dollars flooded into China to be exchanged into Chinese Yuan, as speculators are betting on Yuan appreciation over the dollar.

In other words, currency speculators are EXPORTING our inflation to China by draining the liquidity from the US and bringing hot money to China.

How China handles the massive inflow of hot money? China simply print their own money to soak up all the inflowing US dollars. It costs them nothing to print the Yuan to buy the dollars, and they can spend all the dollars to purchase physical assets and raw materials around the world. This is the Commodity Carry Trade they are playing, very successfully.

Few people in the west recognize China's real strategy. They thought it is impossible for China to sell the dollar and exchange it into euro or yen. Why would China sell one paper just to exchange for another paper? They thought China's recent commodities buying spree is to merely boost price to help domestic producers, or to stockpile for strategic safety. But China's buying of aluminum, a material that China has plenty, signals that it goes far beyond strategic hoarding. Commodities ARE China's new foreign exchange reserves. China is not selling the dollars, China is SPENDING the dollars.

With continued inflow of US dollars, and with China's own money printers running at high speed, China has plenty of money to spend and continue the buying spree. With Yuan tightly pegged to the dollar, this game can continue indefinitely until currency speculators stop sending the dollars to China. Then the US will go from being the largest exporter to the largest importer of inflation, over night! All the dollars will fight their way back home at once. Goods and raw materials will flow out of the USA, until this land is ripped barren! I predict many people will be voting with their feet, before the nightmare scenery occurs.

The currency speculators did the wrong thing selling dollars buy the Yuan. The dollar is going down, but so will the Chinese Yuan. Investors should go to physical commodities, not Yuan or any foreign fiat paper money.

Some Chinese already realize that the Yuan is losing purchase power. In recent months, there was a SUDDEN turn up in real estate markets in major cities in China. The housing slump turned into red hot housing boom, literally over-night, caught many people in a big surprise.

Unless you read news in Chinese, you might think I was telling a fairy tale. But it is absolutely true. There is a sudden housing boom; an auto sales boom; a boom in bank loans. Mean while China could NOT sell its own treasury bonds. What does that tell you? China could not borrow a mere Y28 billion Yuan (US$7B) from its own people. Why would China be able or willing to extend another trillion dollars of credit to the US government?

Jim Rogers is absolutely right that commodity is the only asset class whose fundamentals have not been impaired, but improved. One of the best sectors to play the Chinese commodity buying spree is dry bulk shipping, as China's global buying spree is far from over.

Stocks in dry bulk shipping include the follow names:
EXM, EGLE, TBSI, DRYS, GNK, DSX, NM, OCNF and SBLK.

There is a shipping ETF called SEA. Do your own due diligence on specific positions.

Raw materials that China does not produce, but are critically important to China's economy, are the best commodities to buy. This includes platinum group metals, platinum and palladium; aviation metal titanium; battery technology metal cobalt. My best favorite is the palladium metal, and palladium mining plays: Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL). Recently Andrew Snyder published an article pitching palladium as a critical metal for China, and SWC with a potential of 1,389% gain, without naming the names! I am not sure any one knows what China's next big purchase is. But it is a fact that palladium is one of the critical strategic metals that any modern country must stockpile. Look at TIE as a titanium play, and OMG as for cobalt play. I also recommend buying physical cobalt.

If you are interested in rare and strategically important metals, then follow Jack Lifton, a regular writer for Resource Investor. Jack's article on tellurium got me first interested in the metal. I actually bought some tellurium. Read a recent article on First Solar (FSLR) and tellurium: Hard to Find, Easy to Smell. It's amazing that FSLR still holds up well today and there is still no rush to buy tellurium. But as I predicted, Samsung bets big on tellurium based Phase Change Memory. The chip is already in commercial production. I recommend shorting FSLR if it raises near $200 a share. If you hold long or short position in FSLR, you have a fidelity to your money to demand the truth from FSLR on their tellurium supply.

I have high respect for Jim Rogers. But I have a huge disagreement with him on his love of agriculture commodities. I know his agriculture love is very influential and a lot of people agree with him. But I must point out that he is completely wrong on agriculture. In terms of dollar or any fiat currency, all commodities are bullish. But in terms of growth potential in real purchase power term, agriculture products will perform near the bottom, only better than gold.

I don't like gold (GLD) at current price at all. As the world is facing so many resource crisis, I can not understand why the world as a whole still dedicate a lot of efforts digging a metal that is least useful, and least in shortage. Sell gold to buy silver, physical silver, not SLV. After I carefully scrutinized the silver bars list I do NOT believe SLV has the actual silver bars.

On agriculture: granted that the world sees a food crisis looming; granted that every fact Jim Rogers cited is correct: Farmers can't get loans to buy fertilizer; Asian countries eat more meat; And that food is the single most important human need. Despite all these facts, Jim Rogers is still wrong on being overly too optimistic on growth potential of agriculture products.

Jim Rogers doesn't know how the poorest people in the world are struggling to feed their families. There is demand destruction. The poorest people in the world are already spending 80%, 90% or more of their income on food. Farmers could barely make any profit raising their cattle. If food price doubles, do you think the poor people will have more than 100% of their income to spend? Or a farmer can spend more to feed their cattle? No! Poor people will have to buy less and eat less, and farmers will have to slaughter their cattle.

Such demand destruction can quickly reduce food demand, and hence it tightly caps the price growth potential of agriculture products. This is why agriculture products will never be the most bullish of all commodity plays. Agriculture is still bullish, not bearish, but the growth potential is simply unattractive. A number of rare metal plays can easily beat any agriculture hands down.

My last article called to buy United States Natural Gas (UNG) fund. I was a bit premature. But at current price level, UNG has no more down side and plenty of explosive upside potential. A recent EIA report noted an important trend: At current low natural gas price, it could become economically incentive for power plants to switch to burning natural gas instead of coal to generate electricity! Please read that document carefully. If power stations switch from coal to natural gas, the huge demand boost will put a rock solid bottom at current natural gas price. In comparison, I will caution about adding position on US Oil Fund (USO).

Full Disclosure: The Author is heavily invested in palladium mining stocks SWC and PAL. I also hold significant positions on shipping stocks EXM, EGLE, TBSI, DRYS, GNK, as well as positions in UNG. I hoard physical tellurium metal but have no position in FSLR.

The Great China Commodity Carry Trade

2009-05-31T08:07:00.000-07:00

In a volatile market, rather than trying to get ahead of the daily movements, successful investors spend their effort on figure out the big picture of long term fundamentals. Many people often draw the wrong conclusion when their views are too narrow: They look at only the demand side and forget the story on the supply side, or they fail to see the effect of government interventions or speculative forces.

Recently, in researching the market trend of currencies, commodities and shipping, I made one stunning discovery! The discovery is so shocking it completely changed my views, yet almost no one else discussed in any public literature. My discovery, if proven correct, could mean gigantic investment opportunity for those who get it first!

Where is US dollar Going

A dollar bear means a commodities bull. The 2009 US federal budget deficit will be $1.75 TRILLION or even more! It's utter insanity! Any budget bill can be decreed into law, regardless of the deficit. But no one can decree new economic laws. Where do we get the $1.75T? It will be printed out of thin air, as no one, not even China, can lend this much money to us, unless we lend our money printing machine to China first. History has proven repeatedly that mass printing of fiat money always leads to currency debasement and hyperinflation!

My shocking discovery is that we HAVE already lent our money printer to China!!!

I am dreadful of the worst case scenario for America. Current gigantic deficit spending is not the worst part. The worst part is that capitals may escape from American soil for better overseas opportunities, taking away jobs and tax revenues, reducing us to the only option: print more money and debase the dollar further, a nightmare scenario for America.

US dollar bear leads to commodities bull. The people and nations will hoard physical goods to preserve wealth, hence generate demands higher than the immediate needs and higher than available supplies. China is on a big natural resources shopping spree around the world lately, in order to divest its huge foreign currency reserves.

Both events are occurring as people have noticed: Capitals are escaping American soil; and China is on a global shopping spree of raw materials. But people who do notice these two things explain it as simply market behavior driven by speculative forces, they fail to see a more direct, conscious and deliberate reason behind what's going on, because no one noticed one quiet fact!

People watch the US Dollar index daily, but are they watching the Chinese Yuan? Investors trade trillion dollars between the USD, Euro and Japanese Yen daily. But there is not much trading between USD and Chinese Yuan. That is because for the past one year, trading between USD and CNY is equivalent to exchange one dollar into four quarters, nothing is gained or lost.

The Chinese government has locked the exchange rate at a constant Y6.832 = US$1.00, for over a year now. WHY? Insightful investors Jim Rogers, Peter Schiff, Marc Faber all predicted US dollar collapse and the appreciation of Chinese Yuan, and advised people to sell the dollar and buy the Yuan. Many people listened. They sold their houses and furniture in the USA, sold all their US assets. They brought boat loads of US dollars to China, exchange into Yuan, and sit on their piles of Yuan, betting on the Yuan appreciation over US dollar to collect some profits.

And they collected some dust instead. Making money should never be easy. Straight line thinking is never how great investors make their money. Why would China allow foreign speculators to profit on its currency while it suffers loss?

As the flood of US dollars flows in, China merely cranks up its own money printing press to print more RMB Yuan to exchange for the US dollars. It then uses some of the dollars to buy US Treasury bonds and prop up the value of the dollar, maintaining a constant USD/Yuan exchange rate. But China's real goal is not to support the dollar in long term, but to buy time to allow it to divest the huge dollar assets it is holding, in exchange of physical assets: natural resources, raw commodities, foreign mining companies and other physical assets. It costs China nothing to print more Yuans to buy more US dollars and then use the dollars to buy up the whole world!!!

Thanks to currency speculators, we have lent our money printing machine to China. This opportunity allowed China to launch the greatest Commodity Carry Trade (CCT) in history! It is an absolutely ingenious move: US government has no choice but keep printing more dollars; Speculators betting a dollar collapse flee the US market and bring the dollars to China; the drainage of market capital from the US market forces the US government to print even more dollars and drives more investors away from the US and into China; China then print more of its own currency at virtually no cost, swap for the dollars, and then holding the dollars at hands, they go around the world to buy up everything, and go to the USA to buy up everything. At the end when China is done, they will let the US dollar collapse, mean while, the Chinese Yuan, due to strong backing of all the physical assets China hoarded, will hold up its value.

On the concept of China's Commodity Carry Trade (CCT), credit must be given to Andrew Snyder, whose article on the CCT is an interesting read. I smiled big when I read his pitch on a certain metal and a certain US mining company as the next big target of China's CCT. I knew he was talking about palladium, my favorite metal, and Stillwater Mining (SWC), my most favorite mining stock. There is also North American Palladium (PAL) for palladium play. I am not sure whether palladium is China's next big strategic purchase. But even without China's CCT purchases, palladium is extremely bullish. Thanks to recent break through in cold fusion, palladium could be the investment opportunity of a lifetime!

Shipping and China's Strategic Investments

If China is buying commodities for strategic stockpiling, it will boost demand in the dry bulk shipping sector. I correctly called the bottom of the Baltic Dry Index on Dec. 5, 2008. Shares of dry bulk shippers are up tremendously from the early December, 08 bottom, and from the early March, 09 double bottom. I was betting on a reasonable recovery of shipping, but I never dreamed that the BDI could reach 4291 merely 6 months after it bottomed at 666! Today shipping stocks are still very cheap, as analysts are not convinced the global economy is in recovery. But isn't it now an open secret that China is spending out its US dollar holdings in exchange for natural resources and raw materials it can buy and hoard at current low prices. When China purchases for strategic hoarding, current industry demand is not even relevant.

There is but one small cloud in the shipping sector. Drewry report calls current dry bulk sector recovery temporary, as they see a big number of new order ships joining the fleet in the next few years. How credible is Drewry's bearish call based on their new ship order prediction?

Drewry called that BDI "seems to have reached the bottom", six months after the fact. That doesn't give them much credibility predicting something six months after the fact. I actually called the bottom spot on. In 2003, Drewry also made a similar bearish call on dry bulk shipping, based on their prediction of excessive number of new ships. We now know that shipping saw an unprecedented boom period in the next 5 years, peaking in August, 2008. If the new ships Drewry predicted since 2003 are still on paper in 2009, they may stay on paper for 6 more years. Most new order ships may never be built, due to reasons I discussed before.

One of the criteria I use to pick the best shipping stocks to invest, by looking at the ratio of shipping capacities of their fleets versus current market capital, as the shipping tonnage is ultimately what earns revenue. I will leave the detailed discussion till next time. My favorites are EXM, EGLE, DRYS, TBSI and GNK, in that order.

On Precious Metals

Gold will continue to be a laggard in precious metals. The world is never in shortage of gold. Gold is just money, or just cash. Recently some gold bugs made a lot of noise of China revealing that it doubled its gold reserve in the past 5 years. But it must be pointed out that China's foreign currency reserve increased more than 10 fold during the time, so gold is now actually a smaller percentage of China's total currency reserve.

Silver is a better story than gold. If fiat currencies fail, silver is the only monetary metal that is cheap enough to be used as bartering currency. The Chinese consider gold as a luxury but silver as money and storage of wealth. In Ancient China the gold/silver price ratio was 2:1. As Chinese investors turn their attention towards precious metals, silver will be their most favorite metal.

But the best precious metal story is in platinum and more so in palladium. The bullish palladium news from Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK) in Russia keeps getting better. Norilsk had announced the production result of Q1, 2009. The Q1 palladium production had fallen to only 557K ounces in the Russian division. Annualized it's 2.23 million ounces per year, compare with a normal year's 3.1 million ounces. I predicted Norilsk's 2009 palladium production would be only 2 million ounces, because they are producing the ores rich in nickel content and poor in palladium. The Q1 result had confirmed my prediction.

The current low palladium price provides no economic incentive to recycle auto catalytic converters. So as the palladium recycling grinds to a halt, it removes another one million ounces of global supply. The drop of recycling is confirmed in Stillwater Mining (SWC)'s Q1 report.

Palladium has huge future potential due to recent renewed interest in Cold Fusion, especially after CBS 60 Minutes aired a special report on Cold Fusion on April 19, 2009.

Other Commodities To Consider

Crude oil price has now surges back to $68 per barrel due to the weakness in US dollar. Some predict oil could surge to $200 in the near future. Comparatively, natural gas price still far lags behind. This creates a great buying opportunity, as natural gas is still cheap to buy, when most other commodities have rallied from recent bottom. Even Dr. Doom Marc Faber called natural gas the most under-valued commodity recently.

Two reasons to buy natural gas here. First, current price is far below the marginal production cost. In the US, the conventional natural gas fields are depleting rapidly. Natural gas production was boosted in the past two years only because of new technology and higher natural gas price made it economical to develop the so called shale gas. But as the price falls below $10-$13 per thousand cubic feet (TCF), shale gas is no longer profitable so producers must cut back.

Second, from the energy point of view, 5.3 TCF of natural gas contains the same amount of energy as one barrel of oil, so $4 per TCF is equivalent to $21 per barrel oil. When crude oil price is already at $68, the low price in natural gas is unsustainable as industry energy consumers will try to use more natural gas and less oil.

How to play natural gas? Buy the United States Natural Gas fund (UNG) is the best way. Stocks of natural gas producers would go up with the commodity. But judged from past experience, price of the natural gas itself could jump up faster and more furious than stocks of producers. Some producer stocks to consider: CHK, SWN, COG, MCF and WMB.

Full Disclosure: The Author is heavily invested in palladium producers SWC and PAL. I am also heavily long shipping stocks EXM, DRYS, EGLE, TBSI and GNK. I also own UNG.

No Need to Over-React to Swine Flu!

2009-04-26T21:58:00.000-07:00

The global panic reaction to the swine flu spreading in Mexico is unwarranted. People should not over-react. I did over-react myself as I myself did rush to buy some surgical masks for me and my family, just in case I will need them and they run out. But rationality took over me over the weekend and I now believe this will be a non-event. Let me explain:

It is NOT flu season. It's late spring and early summer in the Northern hemisphere. There are good reasons that flu does not spread during the summer time. Of course, the southern hemisphere may need to worry about this swine flu outbreak a bit more than we do. But so far no case is discovered in the southern hemisphere.
If this swine flu is a bad one, it's already too late to contain and it should already spread widely globally. But so far the spread is very limited. Even in Mexico, most of the cases are confined in Mexico City. There are so far only 1600 cases out of a population of 20 million. The US so far has only 20 cases, all very mild. Again now is simply not the flu season.
Death rate seems to be high in Mexico city, 80+ deaths out of 1600 cases. But it could be due to the fact that now is not flu season and it is not easy for the flu to spread. The individuals catching the flu must be in poor health conditions to start with. So it is not surprising that those weak enough to catch the flu in a non-flu season could also die easily.

Let's all use some good sanitary practices: avoid shaking hands; wash hands frequently; stay at home if you are sick, etc. But let's do not panic un-necessarily. Remember that flu kills due the the over-reaction of one's immune system.

Full Disclosure: The author has neither a long position nor a short position in the swine flu.

The True Rationale of Commodities Supply and Demand

2009-04-20T21:38:00.000-07:00

The price of rhodium staged an impressive rally in recent weeks. At the bottom of recent commodities sell off at the end of October, 08, rhodium dropped to $750 per ounce, from the high of $10,000 just a few months ago. Since the October bottom, rhodium price has raised to $1650 per ounce, a surge of up 120%, while gold is up only 25%, silver up 36%, platinum is up 58% and palladium is up 38%. Clearly rhodium has been the best performing precious metal.

But if you ask the metals analysts, they will tell a bearish story. Rhodium has no investment demand, as the metal is extremely hard to buy and sell, and there is no futures trading on rhodium. Rhodium's demand is purely industrial, with auto sector accounts for over 90% of the total. The auto sales are weak, so the rhodium demand should be weak and the price must drop.

Analysts get one thing wrong. For an easily hoarded metal like rhodium, the true industry demand does NOT equal to the immediate consumption need. The true demand is how much industry users are willing to buy, at current price, NOT how much their current needs are. Analysts have confused purchase demand, the force that drives price, with consumption demand, which doesn't affect price.

Like wise, the true supply of the metal is NOT how much the mining companies have produced, but rather, how much they are willing to sell, at current price. I suspect some South African PGM mines may hold back some of their rhodium to wait for a better price in the future.

As the metal is dirt cheap now, industry users will want to buy more, much more than they would need for the next 3 months, 6 months or even 10 years. The cost is minimal to store rhodium for long term. It makes perfect economic sense to buy extra at $1600/oz, so you can buy less when the price runs up to $10,000 again. It's common sense people should buy more when things are cheap, and buy less when they are expensive.

Such rationales, as well as the fact that PGM prices rallied strongly off their recent lows, are proofs that the bearish calls on the PGM metals, such as bearish calls made by the Fortis Group, do not reflect the reality and are completely unfounded. Investors would do better looking at the complete picture and do not let the analysts do the thinking for you.

The same rationale can be applied to other easily hoarded commodities, like industrial base metals: copper, zinc, nickel, cobalt, aluminum. That might be the reason why most commodities bottomed at roughly the same time, and then all rallied up since. People in the industry understand they can not expect prices to stay low forever. If prices are lower than marginal production cost, producers will have to cut back and prices must go up to reflect the real cost. So it is prudent for industry users to buy more, hoard more for their future needs, if they can, while the prices are low.

One exception is coal, as coal is cheap and bulky. It is costly to store large quantity of coal if it is not used soon. That's why coal price hasn't recovered yet like other commodities do. I would caution about buying coal stocks now, like BTU, ACI, CNX, MEE and JRCC.

The Chinese government understands the economic principles of commodities pricing. There are reports that China has been aggressively spending out its US dollar reserves to buy and stockpile all sorts of industrial materials. Some speculate that China's purchases could be the reason behind recent surge of copper price. Copper is unique as its price never significantly fall below production cost, and few producers actually cut copper production as they are still making profits. For example, Southern Copper Corp. (PCU) could still break even in Q4, 08. Read "copper standard" on recent China speculations in copper.

If China and other countries are stockpiling industry raw materials, then it's a good bet that dry bulk shipping stocks will continue to be bullish, as you need ships to transport bulk materials around the world. All shipping stocks are still dirt cheap to buy, like EXM, EGLE, DRYS, TBSI, GNK, NM, DSX, OCNF, SBLK. My favorite shippers are EXM, EGLE, TBSI, due to their high ratio of shipping capacity versus current market capital, and DRYS due to its asset of ultra deep water drilling rigs. Watch Transocean (RIG) to get an idea on deep water oil drilling.

The biggest metal story is about my favorite metal palladium. On sunday April 19, CBS 60 Minutes carried a special TV program about the science that will shape our energy future: Cold Fusion! You can watch it or read it. Read my previous comment on the breaking news.

The 60 Minutes program, titled "Cold Fusion is Hot Again", is a powerful endorsement on the science of LENR, Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, previously known as Cold Fusion, an important physics discovery previously discredited, but picked up research interests again as new evidences have convinced many former cold fusion skeptics.

It's an impressive CBS report to watch or read. CBS contacted American Physical Society, who sent Dr. Robert Duncan to help to make a determination. Dr. Duncan was a cold fusion skeptic. They flew him to the Israel lab to spend several days there. Let him scrutinize every detail and ask tough questions. At the end, Dr. Duncan was totally impressed and convinced by the compelling cold fusion experimental evidences. The fact that CBS brought alone a skeptical physicist to visit the cold fusion researchers and convinced him that the experiments were legitimate is pretty impressive. On the other side, Dr. Richard Garwin's claim in the TV program that the researchers measured the input energy wrong for 20 years (?!), was decidedly unimpressive. Watch the program and judge by yourself.

Cold fusion relies on the precious metal palladium. Successful commercialization of cold fusion will mean humanity will have a cheap and virtually inexhaustible new energy source, and hence we can put the threat of Peak Oil Crisis behind us. If you are concerned about our energy future, if you care about our children's future, you need to contact politicians and urge them for support of cold fusion research. This science was suppressed for 20 years. We can not allow it to be suppressed any more, for our children, as Peak Oil has already become the reality.

Cold fusion will take some time to be developed into a commercial reality. But when it does, palladium price could go up to unimaginably high level. Such a great investment is worth buying and holding patiently for long term. So now is time to buy any physical palladium you can lay your hands on. It is also a good time to buy stocks of Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL). They are the only PGM producers in North America. As I explained, when things are priced ridiculously low, it is a good time to buy.

Full disclosure: The author is heavily invested in palladium mining stocks SWC and PAL and own AAUK. I also hold large stakes in shipping stocks EXM, EGLE, DRYS, TBSI, GNK, and ETF shares of USO, UNG and SLV.

The Russian Checkmate on Platinum and Palladium Is Looming!

2009-04-14T15:52:00.000-07:00

The palladium bull case is getting better by the day, as the Russians are finally going to make their checkmate move, tomorrow:

Russia to launch platinum, palladium futures trade
MOSCOW, April 14 (Reuters) - Russia's RTS exchange will launch trading in
platinum and palladium futures contracts from April 15, adding to existing
contracts on gold <0#gdrts:> and silver <0#svrts:>, the exchange said on Tuesday.

The contracts are initially for three and six months and will be settled in cash based on the morning fixing on the London Platinum and Palladium Market, RTS said in a statement.

This is an interesting move, in light of recent news that ETF Securities physical platinum and palladium funds will be traded in the US market, which I believe is very bullish. A new Russian platinum and palladium futures market is the ultimate Russian Checkmate, and the best thing I can hope for, on top of all bullish factors in palladium. Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK) must have played a key role in pushing for the new PGM futures market, as they are the world's largest palladium producer. Let me explain why.

Granted, the Russian PGM futures contracts will be cash settled so there is no physical metals demand. But precisely because it is a paper market with no physical limit, it can send the metal prices to unimaginable high levels. The Dutch Tulip Mania happened precisely because cash settled paper derivative contracts, instead of physical flowers, were traded.

A cash-settled PGM futures market has no physical limit and allows more participants, both on the long and short side. Once the longs and shorts established their positions, each side will do their best to move the settlement price to their benefits. As the settlement price is decided by the platinum and palladium spot price, there is huge incentive to manipulate the narrowly traded platinum and palladium spot market for profit.

When a thinly traded physical metal market is manipulated, more often than not, the long side will win, by cornering the market. The short side has limited quantity of physical metal available to sell to depress the price, while the long side can bid for as many ounces as their cash allows them! It is almost a sure thing the longs will win and the shorts will lose. The longs could only lose if they are too greedy and killed by margin, or if they do not have enough capital to bid and drive up the thinly traded physical metal spot market, or if their counter-parties, the shorts, could not perform and could not pay up on the terms of the contracts.

How thin is the spot market of platinum and palladium? The annual supply and demand of each of the metals is roughly 7 million ounces, the bulk of which are contracted out between suppliers and users, leaving no more than one million ounces of each metal available to be sold in the spot market in a year, or roughly $1.2B in platinum and $0.23B in palladium, at current prices. Those are pocket changes in today's financial markets where trillion dollars of trades are conducted every day. Any hedge fund could easily corner this market for profits.

I believe this could be the start of a Russian Checkmate in palladium and platinum. Investors should now position themselves by acquiring any physical platinum and palladium they can find in the market, and by loading up shares of two primary palladium producers, Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL), and maybe some South African PGM producers as well: Anglo Platinum (AAUK), Impala Platinum (IMPUY.PK), Platinum Group Metals (PLG), and Anooraq Resources (ANO).

I have been watching Colossus Minerals (CSIMF.PK) since it was first pitched by Mr. James West, publisher of Midas Letter. I wasn't totally convinced by James West's pitch so I never bought. But I encourage the readers to do their own DD to decide if it is good.

Are industry users of PGM metals aware of the looming Russian Checkmate? Auto makers like General Motors (GM), Ford (F) and Toyota (TM) must immediately prepare themselves for the extreme PGM price volatility and possible supply disruption as the Russian PGM futures start trading on April 15, 09. They must purchase and accumulate a strategic stockpile to safeguard their supply, or they will lose, as investors who act promptly will become winners.

Full Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in SWC and PAL, and own positions in AAUK and ANO. I do not own positions of other stocks mentioned. I own other positions unrelated to discussion in this article, like shipping stocks EXM, EGLE, DRYS, TBSI and GNK; precious metals stocks SSRI, PAAS; and ETFs like USO, UNG and SLV.

Latest On Precious Metals and Commodities

2009-04-06T23:29:00.000-07:00

The news over the weekend was that IMF is going to sell 403.3 metric tons of gold. Wow! 400 tons of gold!

Except that it is old news. IMF has been making a lot of noise of selling 403.3 metric tons of gold for nearly a year now (some say for over a decade!). So what exactly is new? They never sold an ounce of gold. I will believe the IMF gold sell when it happens.

But such an expired old joke was enough to knock gold price down $25 on Monday, or -2.8%. Silver was down even more, -5.0%. Was IMF going to sell silver as well, or what?

There must be too many speculators and not enough serious investors in gold and silver. If you are serious about buying gold and silver as safe haven assets, then you should buy the physical metal, take delivery and hold for long term as an insurance for your financial security. Monday's gold/silver plummet proves that speculators still dominate the gold market; sentiments, rather than fundamentals, are still the driving force behind gold price. Even James Sinclair, the most outspoken gold bug, got so frustrated that he almost gave up attempts to persuade people to demand gold delivery from the COMEX.

Mean while, London based ETF Securities had just made US filings for platinum and palladium trust. Read the SEC filings for platinum and palladium. This is the first step in introducing the ETFs for physical platinum and palladium into the US market. This is extremely important and very bullish for the platinum and palladium metal, as demand from US investors could absorb a considerable amount of available PGM metals, and could trigger panic hoardings by industry users as they fear a looming shortage due to booming investment demand.

Jim Rogers summed up successful investments in three words: Skeptics, Curiosity and Persistence. My favorite precious metal is palladium as my study convinced me this metal has the most bullish supply/demand fundamentals among all precious metals. Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK) in Russia supplies 45% of the world's palladium. So every day I watch closely any news coming from Norilsk Nickel in Russia.

As I watched, the news from Russia keeps getting better for the palladium bull story:

Russia could suspend platinum/palladium export due to bureaucratic confusions. The confusion was due to conflicting laws and presidential decrees. The unspoken truth is if the Russians have a high incentive to export, the bureaucracy can be sorted out quickly. But as current prices of palladium and platinum are so low, there is absolutely no incentive for the Russians to speed up the exportation of the precious metals. Logically, they would rather drag their feet on the issue, and watch the metal prices skyrocket in an ensuring shortage. Then they can resume the exportation at much higher prices.

Norilsk Nickel is in bad financial shape due to low nickel and copper prices. If they run out of cash, they may have to shut down mining operations. This could send palladium price skyrocketing due to the supply disruption. Norilsk lost a total of 90.15 billion roubles in second half of 2008, or US$2.65B. They wasted US$2B in cash in a controversial stock buyback program just a few months ago. And now they are re-selling the buyback shares for mere US$350M cash. Even worse, they can't even find a buyer. Things at Norilsk got so bad that Russian Government launched an investigation in their finances.

In a previous article I discussed why fundamentals of palladium are getting better. The recent science break through in Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) could attract more investment interest in palladium as it will become a critical strategic metal for the future energy needs.

Besides buying physical palladium metal, you can buy shares of two mining stocks: Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL). People have complained about the difficulty in buying and selling physical palladium, as the premium is too high and the buy/sell spread is too wide. Complain no more, folks! You will soon be able to directly buy and sell shares in a palladium ETF, just like GLD for gold and SLV for silver.

Talking about ETFs, I am not a big fan of any ETF. Why invest in physical precious metals, if the metals are not in your direct control, and free of counter-party risks? Many people questioned whether SLV really holds the silver. But to their credit, SLV has been tracking silver spot price rather precisely so far. So long as SLV continue to track silver spot price, you may feel safe to hold SLV positions. But just don't hold it for too long. Holding physical metals is still the safest investment, when there is so much mistrust in the system.

On other commodities, crude oil price has already bottomed as OPEC's production cut is beginning to take effect. You may buy some US Oil Fund, USO on dips. Mean while, I believe it is time to massively load up US Natural Gas Fund, UNG, as there is very little further down side. Natural gas producers are cutting production aggressively at current price level. From an energy point of view, current natural gas price is equivalent to roughly $23 per barrel oil. That's rather cheap compare with crude oil price. Unfortunately, for oil and gas, you have to buy the ETFs as it is impossible to take physical delivery of these two things.

Full Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in SWC and PAL, and hold positions in silver stocks SSRI and PAAS. I also hold positions in AAUK, USO and UNG. I am also heavily invested in shipping stocks EXM, EGLE, DRYS, TBSI, GNK.

A Beatiful Science Dream Came True On The 20th Anniversary!

2009-03-24T11:11:00.000-07:00

Two news items make the bullish case for precious metal palladium stronger.

First, a 20 years old beautiful science dream is finally confirmed this week. The breaking news quickly spreads through the global Medias. Read it here, here, here and here. On the 20th anniversary of the initial Fleischmann-Pons announcement of the original Cold Fusion, and on the same University of Utah campus, scientists from the US Navy SPAWAR lab presented their experimental work that convincingly proved that Cold Fusion is real, at the annual American Chemical Society meetings.

This news brings renewed hope that we may finally have a virtually inexhaustible new energy source to replace the world's depleting fossil fuels, cut carbon emission (Secretary Steve Chu are you listening?), and overcome the world's looming Peak Oil energy crisis.

I have previously discussed the connection between Cold Fusion and palladium. Cold fusion relies on palladium as the metal has a unique property: its extreme affinity to hydrogen and deuterium helps the deuterium nucleus to get closer and fuse into helium, releasing lots of energy. I have followed cold fusion developments, and tracked the research of Pamela Mosier-Boss and colleagues at SPAWAR. I also mentioned the Arata public demo, the first successful public demo, in a previous Seeking Alpha article. Read the heated debates in the comments.

For the first time, the SPAWAR discovery is accepted as real, as no one, not even the skeptics would question the credibility of the experiments any more. The remaining controversy is in the interpretation of the observations. To any one who knows physics, it's conclusive that nuclear reaction must have happened, as neutrons and gamma rays are detected.

No wonder the news quickly spread through the global Medias in less than 24 hours! I can not emphasize enough how important this break through means to humanity's energy future! I immediately called my Congress representatives but found out that they have already noticed the story, and have printed copies sitting right on their desks!

How many investors immediately realize the connection between palladium and cold fusion, and are quick to seize one of the best investment opportunities in a generation?

How many politicians realize the EXTREME DANGER if the cold fusion technology falls into the wrong hands? It can be developed into a new energy source, or a new thermal nuclear bomb! The research can be done with a couple million dollars, the materials are readily available: palladium and heavy water. Such a horrible weapon can be easily smuggled in undetected. There is no radiation. No suspicion could be raised as the heavy water is perfectly drinkable and the palladium is merely a precious metal! A terrorist could also pull a "Cold Fusion Bomb" hoax and the threat must be treated as credible, as we have no way of discrediting such a hoax if we do not grasp the Cold Fusion technology ourselves!

I urge people to contact elected politicians and urge for support of the Cold Fusion research, not only to secure our energy future, but also to prevent this potentially dangerous technology from falling into the wrong hands!

Now back to palladium. One Russian news story makes the metal extremely bullish, in the immediate future. The news suggests that Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK), the world's largest nickel and palladium mine, may run out of cash and could be on the brink of shut down. A Norilsk Nickel shut down will have a huge impact on the global supply of nickel, palladium and platinum, as they supply 20% of the world's nickel, 45% of palladium and 12% of platinum. Their shut down could immediately send prices of all three metals flying in the ensuring panic of shortage, particularly palladium.

The latest news that Russian Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin was inquiring about Norilsk's finances knocked the stock (NILSY.PK) down as much as 14%. Mr. Sechin demanded an explanation of the 86 billion rubles (US$2.6 billion) share buyback and other matters.

At the end of August, 08, Norilsk Nickel launched a controversial stock buyback program to buy back 7,947,000 shares at 6167 Roubles per share, or 49 billion Roubles (US$2B). The buyback proceeded even as some share holders fought against it in court, denouncing the program for depleting the company's cash reserve and push it to the brink of bankruptcy.

Then on March 11, 09, Norilsk announced that they are re-selling the buyback shares for a mere $355M, getting only 18 cents back on the dollar. It's absolutely hilarious! As commodities collapsed, companies are suspending dividends, issue new shares and do all they can to raise and preserve cash liquidity. But Norilsk Nickel threw cash away in a meaningless stock buyback, and then had to re-sell the shares for a fraction of the cash. WHY?

This story and the Russian Government investigation of Norilsk Nickel finances imply that they could be in a deep financial mess concealed to the public, and that they are desperate for cash, as their mining operation is losing money heavily at current low nickel and copper prices (my estimate is a loss of $0.5B to $1B per quarter). If they run out of cash, they must shut down the mining operations. It will send the palladium price to the moon when that happens.

To seize the opportunity, you can buy any physical palladium metal you can find. Better yet, buy shares of Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL). These two are the only primary palladium producers in the world. You can also buy South African PGM mining companies, like Anglo Platinum (AAUK) and Impala Platinum (IMPUY.PK). Palladium metal can be bought from APMEX and PAMP or other precious metal dealers. I am trying to talk with SWC and PAL to see how they can help average folks to acquire physical palladium more easily for investment.

The FED has unleashed the nuclear option: US debts monetization. It means mass printing of money and inevitable collapse of the US dollar. It makes a compelling case for owning precious metals to safeguard your financial security: Gold, Silver, Platinum and Palladium. I will talk about outlook of US dollar and how to survive the hyper-inflation in the next articles.

Looking at the fundamentals of supply and demand, palladium beats other precious metals hands down. Again I want to caution people against buying Gold ETF (GLD) and Silver ETF (SLV), as I do not see convincing evidences that physical metals actually exist to back these two ETFs, and the silver bars serial number list contains lots of red flags to be trusted. If you like silver, you'd better owning physical silver or silver mining stocks like SSRI, PAAS, HL and CDE.

Some thought on what looming hyper-inflation would do to banks. I believe that NO BANK can survive the hyper-inflation, regardless of how sound their balance sheets look. The reason is simple: Why would any one leave money in a bank if the currency is losing value rapidly? All banks will fail if people are withdrawing cash en mass. But please do NOT rush to your bank to withdraw your cash tomorrow. I do NOT want to cause bank runs. You still have enough time to gradually and orderly withdraw money from your bank and put the money into precious metals and other valuable physical assets.

I am looking for short opportunities in all bank stocks. Jim Rogers said he was shorting JP Morgan (JPM), which looks to be a good choice. Some other bank names come to consider: Bank of America (BAC), Citibank (C), Wells Fargo (WFC), Bank of New York (BK). All banks ultimately will fail or be nationalized. There is absolutely no investment value in any bank. Bottom line: There can be NO healthy banking industry without a sound monetary system, just like no fish can live without water. But too many people have already shorted banking stocks. In light of the on-going short squeeze in financial stocks, it is better to wait patiently a little longer, before entering short positions in banking stocks at higher price levels.

Full Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in SWC and PAL, and shipping stocks like EXM, DRYS, EGLE, TBSI, GNK, NM. I own silver mining stocks SSRI, PAAS and HL. I do not currently have short positions in banks but am waiting for opportunity to short.

China and the World Drives the Commodities Boom

2009-02-14T20:05:00.000-08:00

The Baltic Dry Index (BDI), a shipping index considered as one of the most reliable global economic indicator, has been surging up for 17 consecutive days as of Feb. 11, 09. It's not often that something just keeps going up for 17 days. The strong rally of BDI has caught a lot of attentions. However, dry bulk shipping stocks like DRYS, EXM, EGLE, GNK, TBSI and NM plummeted instead of moving with BDI. What's going on? Let me digress a bit on the big pictures before talking about specifics of shipping fundamentals.

Most people remain skeptical about the outlook of the BDI, despite of 17 days rally. Trader Mark asked "What's Really Going On". Most believe the BDI rally will be short lived. So when BDI finally dropped for two days, Bespoke Group declared "BDI rally is DEAD"!

The skeptics are wrong because they only read the news headlines but failed to study the real reasons of the BDI plummet in 2008 and strong surge back recently. They do not know the fundamental forces behind the global commodities boom and China's emergence as a major economy. The skeptics failed to predict a rebound in BDI so soon and so powerful. I correctly called the bottom and called for an imminent and powerful rebound of the BDI as well. So I am comfortable to call the skeptics wrong and predict continued surge of BDI.

Skeptics are wrong because they know what's going on in the USA, but paid little attention to the rest of the world. Chinese knew even less about the world 30 years ago. There was no TV, no telephone and you were NOT allowed to listen to foreign radio stations. Today, China has more internet surfers and cell phone users than the USA has population. Chinese teenagers are bigger fans of America's Hip Hop than American teenagers. One rich Chinese farmer bragged to live in an exact replication of the White House, down to small details. The Chinese are eager to learn everything in America and Europe, and try to imitate everything.

The internet brought easy access to information and profoundly changed China and the world. INFORMATION, not idealism, is the fundamental driving force behind the global commodities boom. China is not alone. Changes are also happening in India, Brazil, Russia, and even in the African continent. An isolated African village could remain in a primitive lifestyle indefinitely. But once they have a TV or a computer or just an outside visitor, they will learn about the outside world. They will want a better life and they will be eager to learn to acquire knowledge and work skills. They will produce something to exchange for useful products from the rest of the world. The chain reaction will leads to more developments and more demands of the world's raw materials. As I discussed before, it all started with one Chinese's visit to Texas and a cowboy hat, and now it becomes a global trend no one can stop.

INFORMATION drives the global commodities boom. The current global financial crisis, severe as it is, will NOT last as long as the Great Depression. Easy access of information allows capitals (smart money) to quickly discover and relocate to new investment opportunities.

Many Americans believe the collapse of the US economy is the end of the global economy. But we are not the whole world. The rest of the world can live on without America. The danger America faces is that the rest of the global economy can continue to boom without us, as capitals flow away from American soil to find opportunities overseas. The Obama administration's new stimulus package WILL boost demand for sure, for a while. But will it bring home capitals to generate jobs, or rather drive capitals and jobs to overseas?

President Obama: I challenged you to bring home Jim Rogers, America's best known billionaire refugee. If he comes home with his money, we have hope. If he stays in Singapore, I might as well leave, too. Please abolish FASB#157, "Mark to Market" rule immediately! There is simply no fair market value in an unhealthy, distressed and distorted market. There have been heated debate of M-to-M rule on the Bank of America (BAC) message board on Yahoo (YHOO) Finance. Abolishing "Mark to Market" is the only way to save banks.

The outlook of global shipping is bullish as China's 4 trillion yuan stimulus program is already taking effect. China's bank loans in January more than double the record set a year earlier. Steel price surged 41% from the low, indicating a booming demand again. More demand on steel means more demand on iron ore and more demand on shipping.

In recent years China's economic growth rely on growth of export to the US and Europe. But China's export remains a small percentage of its GDP. China can sustain its growth without exporting goods to the USA in exchange of US dollars. The 1.3 billion population can and will generate huge domestic consumption demand. China is pushing people to consume more.

China sells goods to the USA and then uses the dollars to buying US treasury bonds. China is basically lending money to America so we can continue to buy Chinese products. This is unsustainable and will not be sustained. Instead China should lend the money to African countries so that Africa can purchase Chinese goods and export their natural resources to China for a payback. I have been reading XinhuaNet (ChinaView) daily. This is exactly what is being discussed in China and what China is doing in Africa. Unlike the debt-laden and tapped-out US market, the African market is completely un-tapped. Africa can afford to borrow more money from China, put more money in their infrastructure building and consume more goods and services. Eventually a developed Africa can afford to pay back the debts.

The information age is narrowing the gap between people and between nations. The world doesn't even have enough commodities to satisfy the development of one China. So does the world have enough to satisfy an Africa and a South America in addition to China? The developing world is developing rapidly and looking up to a much better life standard. Does the world have enough ships to ship raw materials from Africa to China, and goods from China to Africa?

I am bearish on US dollar and US treasury bonds. I am bullish on commodities, on global shipping, and on precious metals, especially palladium. Please read my last article on palladium's fundamentals. I am heavily invested in Stillwater Mining (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL), the only two primary palladium producers in the world. People do need to be cautious about precious metal ETFs: GLD and SLV. James Sinclair publicly questioned where GLD gets all the gold bullion. He should ask where did SLV get all the silver bars with low serial numbers (like 1,2,3). Buy physical metals, not ETFs!

Trader Mark quoted from a Lloyd's List article, which expressed skepticism that the freight rate surge could be short lived. These concerns raised must be carefully addressed:

1. Recent freight rate surge resulted from China restocking the import iron ore inventory. It will slow down as there is no evidence of increased steel demand.

Well, surely there is already strong evidences China's economy and demand on raw materials is recovering rapidly. Pay more attention to news from China!

2. Despite of a remarkable raise in percentage, the BDI at current 2000, is still far below the all time high last August at 12000.

Come on! No one expect the BDI to return to high level overnight. Nothing goes straight up or down. BDI did not fall from 12000 to 666 overnight. No one expects it to return to 12000 tomorrow. The surge from 666 to 2000 in just a few weeks is a more remarkable recovery than any one can expect. In geometric scale, the recovery is at 38% already. From 666 to 2000 is a triple. Another triple will bring it to 6000, just a leap short of 12000.

3. Huge back log of new ship orders. New ships entering service in 2009 and 2010 could expand the global dry bulk fleet by 40%, causing capacity oversupply. Refer to this article on details.

That's a good argument. But we should not take data out of context. New ships are entering service but old ships are being scrapped at the same time. During recent years of shipping boom, scrapping was almost none, as ship owners extended the services of old ships to profit from high shipping rate. Now the shipping rate has fallen, there is a sudden rush to send all the old ships to scrap yards, to bring in cash liquidity and enhance the balance sheets. In just two month, 4 million DWT tons worth of ships were sent to demolition, more than the last few years combined. Scrapping old ships is surely faster than building new ships!

Numbers from the UNCTAD review need to be taken in context. As of end of 2007, there were 10053 new ships and 495M DMT tons on the order books, including 222M DWT tons of dry bulk carriers. That was 72 times higher than it was in 2002. 72 times!!!

Global dry bulk fleet is about 600M DWT tons in size, so assuming a new ship takes 2 years to build, 222M worth of new ships will be build in two years, not counting scrapping, the increase of global fleet will be 222M/600M = 37%. That's how some analysts figured the 40% increase.

But the number is wrong! Average ship lifespan is about 20 years. So normal scrapping due to aging would remove 10% of the fleet in 2 years. The speed up scrapping of over-aged ships could remove up to 20% of the fleet in 2 years. Subtracting 20% scrapping, the increase of the global fleet is only 17% in two years even if all new orders are built.

But don't expect 222M worth of new ships in the next two years. Due to low shipping rate and lack of financing, more than 1/3 of ship orders have already been canceled. More are being canceled or delayed. Read Hellenic Shipping News, ship yards around the world are in very bad shapes. Many could go bankrupt without help.

Question: If shipyards had normal business in 2002. Now their order book is 72 times bigger than the 2002 level. That looks like an incredible booming business by any standard. Why are shipyards in bad shapes now? Even if 30%, 50% or even 90% of orders were canceled, the remaining orders would still be many times bigger than the 2002 level, not to mention the profit from cancellation fees. There are not a lot of ship builders in the world. The list easily fits on one sheet of paper. Global ship building capacity could not have increased too much from 2002 level, surely not 72 times! There is not enough space, materials, building capacity or financial backing to build 10053 ships at the same time, and deliver them within two years.

Some one must get the numbers terribly wrong. In any case, you can be rest assured that if ship builders are on the brink of bankruptcy, then we will NOT see any rush of new ships joining the global fleet in the next two years. More likely the global fleet will shrink instead.

Thus I encourage people to take advantage of recent shipping stock plummet. Buy shipping stocks like EXM, EGLE, DRYS, NM, DSX, GNK, TBSI, OCNF, SB and PRGN. I have not looked at all of them in details. But based on my study, my personal favorites are EXM, EGLE, DRYS and NM. Please do your own due diligence research.

Disclosures: The author is heavily invested in palladium producers SWC and PAL. I also hold big positions in shipping stocks EXM, EGLE, DRYS. I do not own other stocks mentioned.

Recent Developments in Precious Metals and Shipping

2009-02-01T02:43:00.000-08:00

Gold rush 2009 is on! Gold is the front runner in precious metals so far. Gold is now only 10% away from its early 2008 high; silver is 39% off; platinum is still 57% off the high; palladium is still 67% off the 2008 high. Gold is the front runner and palladium is the laggard.

Don't buy the front runner, buy the laggard! Chasing the front runner and big crowds is the fastest way of losing money. Just look at recent bloodshed in DryShips (DRYS), a front runner in shipping stocks. I switched from DRYS to EXM and cautioned about DRYS in mid January, 09. So I was lucky to have avoided the massacre in DRYS. There are inherit problems in DRYS that are now exposed, but big crowd sentiments added to the severity of plummet.

Gold is currently the front runner of precious metal because most people intuitively know what is gold. But few people have heard about palladium. Recent stories from Russia and South Africa indicate that palladium and platinum has the most bullish fundamentals among precious metals, while gold has the weakest fundamentals.

First, palladium. Norilsk Nickel, producer of 45% of the world's palladium, just released the Q4 and full year 2008 production. The palladium production dropped to 2.702M ounces, much lower than the 3.05M ounces in 2007, even though the nickel production is in line with 2007. Norilsk expects another drop of 7% in palladium production in 2009 to bring it down to about 2.5M ounces. The reason cited is lower grade of PGM content in the ores. I explained before that Norilsk has two types of minerals: the one high in nickel and low in palladium content, and the one low in nickel and high in palladium. Due to current low nickel price, they must opt to mine the high nickel ores, hence produce less palladium.

Base on my calculation of their mineral ores grades, if they produce the highest nickel grade while maintaining the nickel production level, the 2009 palladium production could drop to only 2.0M ounces, from 3.05M ounces in 2007. More likely, Norilsk will be forced to cut nickel production to meet weaker global demand. In that case, palladium production could fall significantly below 2.0M ounces.

Adding to the bullish case is news from South Africa of a looming mining worker strike to protest against the job cuts. I think the mining companies there, hurt by low PGM prices, would LOVE to see the strike proceed so as to drive up the metal prices.

The bullish case of palladium can not be better. Look at the supply/demand picture starting with data from Impala Platinum (IMPUY.PK); we will be talking about global demand of roughly 8.215M ounces. On the supply side, South Africa can provide roughly 2.2M ounces if current production cuts are implemented. Russian will provide 2.0M ounces, North America will provide about 0.33M from Stillwater Mining (SWC), other sources count for about 0.3M, and there will be little recycling as low palladium price discourages recycling.

Summing it up; we are looking at about 4.83M in palladium supply, versus 8.215M in industrial demand, not counting any investment demand on the physical metal. The deficit will be 3.385M ounces, or 41% of industrial demand. No other metal has such a large margin of deficit!

Remember, a less than 4% deficit in rhodium was all it took to drive the metal from $300 to $10000 per ounces!!! What would a 41% deficit in palladium do, to the price? What would investors do, when they jump on the palladium shortage wagon and help drive up the price?

Remember, the Russian Government is trying to help Norilsk Nickel with its financial difficulties due to current low metal prices. There have been talks that the government will purchase some of the precious metals from Norilsk Nickel and re-stock the government's depleted strategic stockpile. The Russians can easily drive palladium price up to $2000, $3000 or even $5000 per ounce, if they so choose. I don't see why not! The Polar Bears are not Santa Clause! They want to make money just like every one does.

In 2000/2001, upon one false rumor that Russian government was terminating the annual palladium stockpile sale, the panic buying drove palladium price up from $300 to $1100 per ounce. There was only one investment fund noticed the palladium rally, and profited from it. At the time gold was at the low and there was no interest in precious metals as safe haven assets.

Today, it is a material fact that Russian government stockpile sale ended, and Norilsk's palladium production is down, and Russian government may be buying the metals to help Norilsk as well as replenish its strategic stockpile. And today there is plenty of interest in all precious metals as safe haven assets as the financial crisis unfolds. Rest assured there will be a lot more investment interest in palladium than last time.

It's not too late to buy physical palladium. And time to buy stocks of the world's only primary palladium producers, Stillwater Mining Company (SWC) and North American Palladium (PAL).

I am openly calling these two companies to consider how they can help the average investors to acquire the physical metal easily, and hence be able to participate in and gain from the coming palladium boom. I believe that the precious natural PGM resources are NOT the private properties of mining companies, but belong to the people. These two companies, blessed with the privilege to produce the natural resources, have the social responsibility that they must maximize the value of the metals they produce so as to pay back the community.

Likewise, the Governments of the USA and Canada have the responsibility to ensure any minerals produced from their soil must maximize the values and must not be sold below cost. If the metals are priced below cost, then the governments should purchase and stockpile these precious strategic metals. The Chinese government is already stockpiling strategic metals to protect its domestic mining industry and take advantage of recent low commodity prices. The US and Canadian governments must do the same for their respective national interests.

Now let's talk about gold. Current price of gold is about $900 per ounce. I believe gold is fairly priced as most gold mining companies are making comfortable profits. I believe there is now no good reason for average Joe to buy gold at this price. Joe makes $40K per year, or $28K after tax. He makes $112 per work day after tax. So to buy a one ounce gold coin, he needs to work at least 8 full work days to earn enough money for it.

Joe might as well take 8 days off to go prospecting for gold. Some gold prospecting web sites claim you can collect up to two ounces of gold a day. Sounds like a better deal than earning a salary to buy gold. Maybe California the golden state should have zero unemployment? Lost your job? Go prospecting for gold and you get yourself a job making tax-free real money.

The economic incentive to prospect for gold rather than to buy gold puts a reasonable natural cap on gold price, in terms of purchase power. But silver, platinum and palladium are different as you can NOT prospect for these other precious metals. So these other precious metals should have bigger room for gain. My only advice is stay away from ETFs like GLD and SLV. Instead buy physical metals and precious metal mining shares. I am suspicious of these two ETFs after I browsed through their physical metal bars serial number lists. I will not elaborate here. Spend your time scrutinizing the lists to see if you can find some red flags.

What about shipping and the recent bloodshed in DRYS? The Baltic Dry Index has been going up strongly for TEN consecutive trade days in a row, reaching 1099. The low was 666 on Dec. 4, 08. How often do you see something going up 10 days in a row? That says the shipping is recovering strongly. The plummet of shipping rate last year was largely due to credit crunch freezing up trading activities, NOT due to supply and demand. As the credit now eases up, there will be pent-up demand to clean up the goods previously piled up on harbors.

The short term outlook of dry bulk shipping is bullish, the long term prospect is even better, as governments around the world, particularly China, are ramping up gigantic economic stimulation programs. Governments can print money out of thin air. They print paper money not to hoard their own money, but to spend the money.

When governments spend money, every dollar spent is a demand on physical goods and services, just like average Joe's grocery spending. So it is really a moot point talking about consumers spending less and saving 3% of their incomes, when the governments are racking up deficit spending in the tune of multiple trillion dollars.

China is one big driving force behind growing global demand on commodities, as well as growing demand on global shipping, and will continue to be, for many years to come. It's not just a matter of economic development; it is a matter of China's very survival. That's because China is rich in cheap labor forces, but poor in critical natural resources.

As Jim Rogers correctly pointed out, China's very survival hangs in one thing: WATER. China's biggest engineering projects are all water related. The most famous one is the Three Gorges Dam, the world's largest hydro-electric dam. At its peak of construction, this one project alone consumes 1/4 of the world's cement and steel production.

But Three Gorges Dam is nothing comparing with another mammoth project that's already well underway in China, but little talked about in the western world, China's South to North Water Diversion Project, which is at least TEN TIMES as big as the Three Gorges project. It's been talked about for half a century but was only recently rushed through the approval by the People's Parliament in a hurry without much debate: There is simply not much to debate about: Beijing, with its 14 million populations, is depleted of water resources and desperately needs the water to quench the thirsty! It's a non-negotiable, survival issue!

The South-to-North Water Transfer Project was supposed to take at least half a century to finish due to its gigantic scale, but will be rushed probably in a decade, due to the urgency of the water crisis in Northern China. Just think about how much concrete, steel, construction machineries and materials this one project will demands from the world! The infrastructure projects in China will ensure a global commodity and shipping boom for many years to come.

What do I think about DRYS's recent plummet? The panic was caused by DRYS's disclosure that two banks notified it that it was in breach of the loan covenants, as the fair market value of its ships has fallen below a certain percentage of the debts, and that DRYS was trying to raise $500M cash by selling shares in the open market, hence dilute the share value.

I do NOT think the loan covenant thing is too much a deal. How do you define a ship's fair value? I think any physical property's fair value is its replacement cost. But the convention is use recent market transactions of similar properties to determine the "fair market value". I think such terminology is ironic! The market is never a fair place to begin with so the word "fair" and "market" don't come together. Why would it be a "fair price" when a ship owner is coerced to sell its ship far below inherit value, under financial stress? Such unfair price is then used as "fair price" to undercut the assets of every one else and force many more defaults and stress sells, further escalating the crisis. This unfair "mark to market" rule results in distorted values of physical assets. It is one of the culprits of current crisis in real estates and other sectors. It must be abolished and replaced by a "mark to cost" rule.

In light of the continuous surging BDI index, the value of ships goes up with BDI. Banks know this and they don't want to bring an unnecessary crisis on themselves. They will work with shippers to find acceptable solutions to the loan covenants. It's in their best interest to do so.

My biggest worry about DRYS is the ongoing sell of shares to raise $500M. This will greatly dilute the value of DRYS shares. How much dilution? No one knows. So even though DRYS has become much cheaper, I would advice wait a little bit till the dust settles, just to see how much the share dilution factor is. Mean while I believe other shipping stocks like EXM, EGLE, GNK, DSX, TBSI and NM are better buys than DRYS, until we know more about DRYS's share dilutions. For the same reason, avoid OCNF for now.

Full Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in SWC, EXM and EGLE. I also own shares of PAL, OMG, TBSI, DRYS and USO. I do not own other stocks mentioned but positions may change at any time.

Extreme Opportunities to Make or Lose Money

2009-01-22T22:46:00.001-08:00

Today's market is full of opportunities to make money or rather to lose them. Just remember: The market always makes the biggest group of people lose the largest amount of money to allow a few to get obscenely rich at the same time.

For your own good, you should always avoid the biggest crowd, and go to quiet secret places few noticed, it's true for making money and for life in general. Imagine you are at a place with hundreds of thousands of people. There is imminent danger and there are only two bridges leading to safety. One is narrow and in terrible shape. Another is big and in solid shape. Which one would you rush to? I would rather foolishly run to the dangerous one, knowing that all the smart folks will rush to the safer bridge, and collapse the safer bridge due to the sheer weight of the big crowd. That's the philosophy of life.

Read my previous analogy using Noah's Ark. Safe havens, by definition, must be narrow and can not accommodate too many people. If a perceived safe place can accommodate every one, then it is a death trap! The biggest presumed safe haven today, and hence a death trap, is the US Treasury Bonds market. There is an imminent danger in the TB market. People invested in treasuries have already lost big time, without realizing it. The bridge is perfectly safe, until one last person step onto it, and then it collapses suddenly under the collective weight.

Like the bridge, the TB market could collapse merely because there are too many investors in TBs for the perceived safety. The problem is when these people want to unwind their positions, who is going to buy? Whoever want to buy TBs have already done so! In 10 years you will be paid back the principal amount, but maybe not the purchase power. I suspect that government of China or Japan may have utilized recent US Treasury Bonds frenzy to quietly unload their overly too large US Treasury Bonds holdings which are otherwise impossible to unload. It's purely just my speculation with no evidence that I know.

Always avoid the big crowds! Last year when I suspected the big crowd had arrived, I called for folks in coal stocks like JRCC, ACI, ANR, BTU, CNX, MEE, to take profit. The timing was perfect as JRCC peaked just one day later after my article was published on Seeking Alpha.

Recently I was alerted that the dry bulk shipping stock DRYS was too crowded with too high a daily volume. My initial entry into the shipping sector was perfectly timed near the bottom, and I picked the best one to buy at that time, DRYS. But when I became cautious as the sentiment in DRYS was too high. So I switched from DRYS to EXM, another dry bulk shipper, as I believe EXM presented a much better valuation now. Read also David White's take on EXM.

Then, on Jan. 22, 09, DRYS dropped $4.01 on some "bad" news, even as the BDI surged up 5% that day. The news was out before the market open, but it turned into a total panic only in the last hour of trading. I think DRYS was overly punished by the news which isn't so bad after all. DRYS is over sold here. But EXM is still a better buy, from the valuation point of view. Unfortunately Mr. George Economou, the CEO of DRYS, will continue to disturb investors' perception of the company, regardless whether any of his private dealings are appropriate or not. I would rather stick with a company clean of such doubts.

In a previous article, I recommended shorting three stocks which are related to discretional consumer spending, and hence vulnerable during hard times: Coca Cola (KO), Pepsi (PEP) and Colgate (CL). All three are down from when I recommended the shorts. These stocks are not very volatile, and do not have too much short interests. So they are nice long term shorts if you hate volatility.

Along the thinking of discretional spending, I would now recommend shorting Apple (AAPL), and a recent high flier PALM. The current valuation of AAPL is just ridiculous. It is based on the hope of continued fast growth of AAPL's earnings, which is unrealistic. How many more iPhones can AAPL sell, before the market is saturated? The recent hype of PALM is a joke. They have a nice product which may be better than iPhone, but so what? I would rather buy a proven and established product, than something un-proven and non-established. Google (GOOG) is probably a good short, too. GOOG's income mostly comes from web advertisements. When companies are struggling to cut cost, they do not have much appetite spending money on advertisements. These three might not be immediate shorts amid recent earnings announcements. But watch closely for good short entries.

Stillwater Mining (SWC) continues to be my most favorite stock to hold. I firmly believe there is an undisputable bullish case for the precious metal palladium, and hence for SWC. I have yet to analyze North American Palladium (PAL)'s recent announcement for a comment. But SWC is a better value with much higher ore grade and a much bigger mineral reserve. Read about the palladium bullish case.

In short term, the dry bulk shipping sector is the best to be in. The global trade has not and can not come to a complete halt. The shipping industry is capable of adjusting to lowered demand quickly. But think about it: Trillion dollars of government spending is going to be a much bigger demand on physical goods and commodities, than your $200 weekly grocery shopping. There is a chance shipping can even reach new highs.

The unique nature of shipping supply and demand is that when demand is high, it's hard for supply to catch up, because you can not build new ships fast enough, or make the ship sail fast enough to meet the demand. On the other hand, when the demand is weaker, the industry CAN respond promptly to reduce capacity to meet lower demand, by canceling new ship orders, speed up scrapping of old ships, lay up ships for longer period of maintenance, or simply sail slower to save fuel cost and make fewer port calls. All those adjustments are happening right now so in short term, dry bulk shipping is very bullish. All of these shipping stocks are good buys: EXM, DRYS, EGLE, NM, TBSI, GNK and OCNF.

Full Disclosure: The author is heavily invested in SWC and shipping stocks EXM, EGLE, TBSI, as well as hold PAL and cobalt stock OMG. I have no positions on other stocks mentioned in the article.

Precious Metal Fundamentals - Recent Developments

2009-01-11T12:05:00.000-08:00

We live at a time where information, as well as ENTROPY, spreads at light speed. We must be able to use our own intelligence to discriminate and filter out the noise from the internet, otherwise the internet is nothing but a giant trash can. In this world with little trust left in the system, we can no longer trust the authority of any information source. Mr. Bernard Madoff has proven that higher authorities CAN tell much bigger lies for much longer time. Everything we hear must be scrutinized using facts, logic and reasoning. I spotted an internet fraud and developments so far proved me completely right.

Recently Mazda repeated its claim of their single-nano catalyst technology which cuts usage of PGM metals in vehicle catalytic converters by up to 70%. Their technology uses smaller PGM particles and a proprietary agglomeration prohibition material. As a PGM metal investor I always pay close attention to such news that may bring change to the PGM supply/demand fundamentals. So how much can we believe in Mazda's claim and how soon do we expect an impact on the PGM metals demand?

History is the best teacher! In 2002, Daihatsu, announced that they invented a perovskite based Self-Regenerating "Intelligent Catalyst", which dramatically cut PGM metal usage while making the catalytic converters more durable. The idea was pretty good. Frankly the 2002 Daihatsu claim was much more credible than today's Mazda claim. There were independent researches on the perovskite based self-regenerating catalyst at the time. Now six years later, where is Daihatsu's "smart catalyst" today? Has it leads to any reduction in autocatalyst consumption of PGM metal? Not a zilch! If Mazda's idea of reducing metal particle size could work, it would have been tried long ago. My physics background allows me to conclude confidently that the so called single-nano technology CAN NOT work reliably and durably. I do not believe it until they get an EPA approval.

I am not saying that Daihatsu or Mazda made false claims. But scientific researches and commercial applications are two different worlds. In reality, 99% of research advances never make it into commercial products. Those few that do make it into the commercial world, take a long time to get there, and could still be ultimately rejected by the market, for non-technical reasons. Inventor Thomas Edison got cold water poured over himself when he tried to patent one of his first inventions, a voting machine that can precisely tally up voting results. Why we struggled with hanging chads in 2000? Politicians would rather prefer Diebold.

Why recent PGM thrifting news only came from small Japanese auto makers like Daihatsu and Mazda, but never from bigger names like Toyota Motor (TM), or Johnson Matthey, who is responsible for 1/3 of the world's autocatalytic converters? Mazda is NOT setting its priorities right. Each catalytic converter contains about 4 to 5 grams of palladium, worth about $24 at today's price. How can they cut corners and sell vehicles with sub-quality parts to customers? There were so many complaints about defective catalytic converters that even EPA had paid attention. You think consumers will let you get away with it?

Auto makers should boost the palladium content in catalytic converters and make them reliable and durable. Green cars with reliable emission control should then be exempted from the costly ($60+) annual SMOG tests in California and other states. Consumers will welcome the saving of money and hassle as it is worth far more than the extra cost of PGM metals.

I am convinced that the bullish fundamentals of palladium are even better in 2009. Recently Impala Platinum (IMPUY.PK) updated their estimate of platinum and palladium supply/demand data for 2008. Notice the significant drop of Russian supply? The annual sale of Russian Strategic stockpile palladium, about 1.5M to 2M ounces a year, finally ENDED! Back on June 11, 08, the palladium market knee-jerked when Norilsk Nickel (NILSY.PK) merely suggested the termination of the stockpile palladium sale. Now it really ENDS, how will people react when it becomes widely known? Russia maintains a Defense Strategic Stockpile for its own war time needs, not for selling PGM metals below cost to the world.

In Impala's estimates, recycling accounts for 1.1M ounces of palladium supply in 2008. CPM Group estimated the recycling as high as 1.6M ounces a year. The good news is this supply will also be removed in 2009. A new catalytic converter contains about 4 grams of palladium. An old one has about 2 grams left. Recycling recovers about 75%, or 1.5 grams each, worth about $9 in palladium at today's price. The PGM recycling is a long complicated and costly process. At today's low price there is simply no incentive for recycling. Stillwater Mining (SWC) is better off dropping the PGM recycling business now and concentrate on mining. This can boost the metal's market price as well as unlock large working capital that was locked up in the recycling materials inventory, and hence enhance the company's balance sheet.

On recycling, more than 1M ounces of palladium supply are removed. Mining production also dropped significantly. Norilsk Nickel estimated the 2009 palladium production to drop to 2.6M ounces from 3.0M as they now mine the nickel rich and palladium poor minerals to reduce cost, as well as process third party nickel concentrates which contain no palladium. North America Palladium (PAL) shut the mine down earlier, removing another 0.280M ounces supply. South Africa also saw about 10% drop of palladium production, or 0.25M ounces. Stillwater Mining (SWC) also expects reduced production in 2009.

When you add up all the supply disruptions and halt of Russian stockpile sale, despite of a 5.3% drop in auto catalyst demand, we are looking at an unprecedented palladium deficit in 2009, far bigger than in any other precious metals. And we haven't added in potential investor demands! Who wouldn't want to buy some palladium if you know what's going on!

The collapse of PGM prices in recent months was NOT due to fundamentals; rather it was due to investment funds as well as big auto makers were forced to liquidate their precious metals holdings to raise cash. Especially General Motors (GM). Auto makers normally keep 6 months of PGM metals supply to weather any supply shocks. When GM struggled for its survival, it had to sell its PGM inventory at cheap prices. Now that GM says it can expect to survive without more government money. It's time for GM to rebuild the inventory in light of the looming shortage.

Palladium has by far the strongest fundamentals and the best potential for an explosive rally, among all precious metals. I still believe that due to the huge above ground inventory of gold, and the current price above the intrinsic value of production cost, the yellow metal has little room to gain in real value. Gold is a liquid and stable currency, but has no investment value if you are looking for gains.

I like silver better than gold. Silver is mostly a by-product metal so the supply is price-inelastic. As a safe haven investment, silver is more appealing to Joe-Six-Packs as it is more affordable, while gold is more appealing to rich people due to its high density of value. Most people on the GoldIsMoney forum believe silver is more bullish.

But none of the silver bugs even presented specific and quantitative data on silver supply and demand so I want to have a closer look. Photography usage of silver, which traditionally accounts for 1/3 of the demand, is now diminished as digital cameras replace analog ones. Sterling silverwares like spoons and goblets are also going into history. Industrial demand saw some increase in recent year but is uncertain as the global economy goes into recession.

The biggest uncertainty factor is silver jewelry. Silver jewelries are low end cheap jewelries. They are those cheap bling-blings you pick up in a mall or a grocery store when you happen to have a few extra dollars and you just like what you see. So in a sense silver jewelries are discretional spending items and are vulnerable in a slowing economy.

The high end jewelries made of gold, especially platinum and palladium are different from silver. They are rarer, and are more likely purchased as some special gift rather than casual spending. No one would buy a silver earring or necklace as an engagement gift, for example. Your fiance(e) will expect a diamond ring made of platinum, palladium or white gold. People will not tender their platinum wedding bands to pawn shops for cash, but they are perfectly happy to toss out old silver jewelry pieces.

Unlike PGM recycling, which is complicated and costly, recycling from scrap silver jewelries is simple and inexpensive as the materials contain high concentration of silver. Silver recycling remained at near constant high level over the past years, regardless of silver price. The PGM metals are different as low PGM prices discourage recycling and reduce the supply.

I believe silver remains bullish due to investment demand. But due to uncertainties in industry demand, I recently reduced my silver mining stock holdings in SSRI, PAAS and HL, and concentrated more on palladium mining stocks, SWC and PAL. The continued strong rally in Baltic Dry Shipping Index (BDI) shows I made the right call on the shipping sector. So I continue to hold large positions in shipping stocks, like EXM, EGLE, GNK, OCNF and DRYS.

Full Disclosure: The Author is heavily invested in palladium mining stock SWC and shipping stocks EXM, EGLE, GNK, OCNF and DRYS. I also hold positions in PAL, USO and OMG.